Someguy
Afi
Grethos
aadvark
Abhi | AP Collective @ Token 2049 🇸🇬
Sk0rp.eth
Brandon scott
vitalik.eth
Ethos
Syrup
Dpuck (bob)
Samorityanin🧢
一川drive 🔴
Mark Karpelès
aiobkhan ✨
CryptoPasokosProfile· Questionable@0xGr1mmOn Ethos
Grimm
33 reviews, 70% of them positive.70% positive · 33 reviews· Influence factor 1, above 0% of accountsThe record
From 33 activities · Jul 2026Gr1mmJ4w is a prolific Web3 and AI content creator known for deep engagement with projects like Sentient AGI, Seismic, and Kaito, earning top-tier community roles through consistent contribution and creative storytelling. However, they face significant criticism for AI-generated reviews that repeat profile statistics and lack authentic personal insight, with multiple users and a formal slash disputing the authenticity and value of their review output. The profile reflects a sharp divide: genuine community respect for their technical knowledge, work ethic, and creative execution in Web3 spaces, offset by widespread skepticism about their review integrity and resistance to feedback.
What people say
Received · 33Given · 122“Reputation Snapshot: jesse.base.eth – A Trusted Web3 Identity?”jesse.base.eth boasts a strong reputation with a 97% positive trust score and over $2.31K in verified value, indicating a well-established presence in the Web3 space. The pixel art PFP and ENS domain suggest long-term engagement with Ethereum culture, and the attached link to their onchain identity adds transparency. While responses are stored offchain and anonymously, the high trust score and interaction metrics position Jesse as a reliable actor within decentralized communities. Ideal for those seeking trustworthy connections in the identity or reputation layer of Web3.
on jesse.base.eth · 2085· 1y ago10
on jesse.base.eth · 2085· 1y ago10“On-Chain Reputation, Off-Chain Impact”With a near-perfect 99% positive rating and over 1400 trust votes, mert | helius.dev stands out as a respected contributor. The profile reflects a strong presence backed by consistent engagement and value delivery. The $38.04 valuation adds a tangible layer of credibility. A solid example of trust earned in Web3.
on mert · 1883· 1y ago10
on mert · 1883· 1y ago10“Is Reputation Enough? The Case of paulgrewal.eth”This profile asks a powerful question: is the score truly accurate? With a 1376 rep, 99% positive rating, and a “Neutral” label, paulgrewal.eth presents a curious balance between community respect and cautious neutrality. The lack of financial value ($0.00) contrasts with the high reputation score, raising questions about how we measure impact in decentralized identity systems. The voting options, Overrated vs Underrated, empower the crowd to rebalance perceived worth. It's an intriguing look at how offchain, anonymous evaluations might shape the reputational economy of Web3.
on Paul Grewal · 1786· 1y ago10
on Paul Grewal · 1786· 1y ago10“Smooth and trustworthy trade with Sreeram Kannan, quick, honest, and easy to communicate with. Highly recommended!”
on Sreeram Kannan · 1859· 1y ago10
on Sreeram Kannan · 1859· 1y ago10“Arthur shows strong leadership, clear vision and trust. Always delivers value for the community!”
on Arthur · 1820· 1y ago10
on Arthur · 1820· 1y ago10“Balanced Recognition”Vance Spencer’s reputation score of 1434 with 99% positivity reflects a well-earned standing in the community. While the figure might seem modest compared to others in similar positions, it accurately represents consistent credibility and long-term engagement. He’s not overrated or underrated—just appropriately valued for his influence and contributions.
on Vance Spencer · 1821· 1y ago9
on Vance Spencer · 1821· 1y ago9“Trustworthy & Exceptional in Every Interaction”Roseyildirim is one of the most dependable and impactful contributors I’ve worked with. Always delivers beyond expectations, communicates clearly, and adds real value to every project. A true asset to any team.
on roseyildirim .ink 🍊,💊 🧙 ,⛺ Anomage 🧙♂️,🛠️ · 1323· 1y ago9
on roseyildirim .ink 🍊,💊 🧙 ,⛺ Anomage 🧙♂️,🛠️ · 1323· 1y ago9“Trust Gap Despite Solid Reputation Points”AIVA holds 1,271 reputation points but only a 91% positive rating, which is noticeably lower compared to high-trust profiles. With a $0 value, the profile suggests active participation without monetary accumulation. While the score reflects some credibility, the trust gap indicates there’s room for improvement in consistency or perception within the community.
on AIVA 🔺 · 1473· 1y ago9
on AIVA 🔺 · 1473· 1y ago9“Room for Doubt Despite High Rating”While Theoriq’s 99% positive rating is impressive, even a small drop can disrupt the balance of trust. The offchain and anonymous answer system protects privacy, but it can also make verification more difficult. The fact that its financial value is $0 shows that its contribution is based solely on reputation, which may lead users to continuously question their trust.
on Theoriq · 1561· 1y ago9
on Theoriq · 1561· 1y ago9“Steady Community Perception of Sisyphus”With an 83% positive rating, Sisyphus holds a generally favorable standing among the community, reflecting a majority who view them positively. While not a perfect score, the figure shows a solid level of trust and support, suggesting that most participants appreciate their presence and contributions, even if there’s a notable minority with reservations.
on Sisyphus · 1741· 1y ago9
on Sisyphus · 1741· 1y ago9“Mixed Community Trust in Raydium”Review: While Raydium holds a certain level of recognition in the Web3 space, the displayed trust score here suggests a more divided sentiment among participants. Unlike a perfect 100% positive rating, this lower percentage points to varied community experiences, some users likely value its liquidity and integration features, while others may be cautious due to market risks or past events. This mixed trust score serves as a reminder that even established platforms must continually earn and maintain user confidence through transparency, consistent performance, and active engagement with their community.
on Raydium · 1727· 1y ago9
on Raydium · 1727· 1y ago9“Is Their Score Justified?”Wallchain Quacks holds a Neutral score of 1446, despite an impressive 98% positive feedback rate and a substantial $737.01 in value. The high reputation combined with near-universal approval raises questions about whether this neutral label accurately reflects community sentiment. The platform invites users to weigh in — is this score overrated or underrated? A fascinating snapshot of decentralized evaluation and the nuance of collective trust.
on Wallchain Quacks · 1548· 1y ago9
on Wallchain Quacks · 1548· 1y ago9