ZET

196 reviews, 96% of them positive; 247 WHUF vouched for them by 8 people.96% positive · 196 reviews· 247 WHUF vouched· Influence factor 15, above 3% of accounts

The record

From 90 activities · Apr 2026

A crypto veteran and rigorous investigator known for thorough sybil detection, human verification work, and evidence-backed reviews on Ethos. Respected for digging into patterns, calling out bad actors with receipts rather than speculation, and maintaining ethical principles across Web3—though some dispute the evidentiary basis of certain accusations. Active mentor and community builder who mentors others on research methodology, writes detailed project analysis, and consistently contributes to ecosystem integrity.

What people say

Received · 196 Given · 492

“Abuses the bounty system”This ACCOUNT is abusing the review reward system in the context of the daily bounty. It writes meaningless reviews, farms XP, and gives back nothing but noise. An excellent candidate for a red rose.

on Sickboyx base.eth · 1077· 5mo ago · negative39

“A useful functional bot from Ethos”I recently noticed that this bot can be used directly from Twitter (I didn’t know that before). Useful for documenting events, which can be directly reflected in Ethos through positive, neutral, or negative reviews. A good thing. I hope the functionality will only expand.

on Ethos Agent · 1365· 9mo ago39

“Strange guy”Two possibilities: He posts content in the style of an "interesting story / success story," and as soon as it gains views, he deletes it and posts it again. Or he copies someone else's content that has engagement, rephrases it, and posts it as his own. Today I happened to come across him in my feed and read a post that I had read before. Here's the post I came across. The story of a 17-year-old guy who created the first margin exchange for crypto: https://x.com/0xSweep/status/2050223452926439738

on Sweep · 1300· 6mo ago · neutral200

“A True InfoFi Thought-Leader”I've had the privilege of witnessing his growth since the early Friend. Tech days. He stood out not just as a user, but as someone who genuinely understood the mechanics beneath the surface. We've had detailed discussions about the algorithmic incentives behind social-fi platforms, token distribution models, and even the architecture of points systems that drive user engagement. What sets him apart is his ability to dive into technical specifics. Whether it's analyzing the consensus mechanisms of new L2s, comparing validator economics, or evaluating the tokenomics of emerging DeFi protocols. He doesn't just follow trends. He deconstructs them. His skill for absorbing complex concepts quickly and explaining them with clarity makes him a magnet for meaningful dialogue. He doesn't just attract attention. He builds trust through depth, not noise. People like him don't just join communities. They elevate them. A true asset in any conversation where substance matters.

on hammertime · 1319· 1y ago30

“Grinder XP using Alt-Account (almost 100k XP total)”The user has been writing AI slop reviews for quite a while in the context of the bounty programme, both from the current account and from the second one. Every day I observed his accounts and delayed flagging. His second account: https://app.ethos.network/profile/0xcb88f19cF8a39A8a06e4E312884b25Ee01ef570e The duplication of behaviour in Ethos is evidenced by the timing of activity, the timing of posts, and even the day‑streak count with repeated skips. There is rich on‑chain activity between the addresses. I am attaching a screenshot of the interaction log: https://ibb.co/zghYWVt The duplication is corroborated not only by connections, but also by timings, on‑chain protocols – for example, regular interaction with INK and the timings: https://explorer.inkonchain.com/tx/0x0a579d4590672238fbdfd42da7f634b31f1bdaba9930d53a0023dd55a29fcb84 https://explorer.inkonchain.com/tx/0x43218600e71739136fb8358db11dc8e74ac7ce93ba8af483daa9b74d7f7b3736 One of the most brazen or naive Sybil operators I have encountered in Ethos.

on rupeshchy.eth(ARC Native) · 1093· 2mo ago · negative37

“The user has been frequently abusing the protocol”He writes shallow, AI-generated reviews about participants that are misleading. Among other things, it's highly likely he is not actually familiar with them and has had no prior interaction. In response to criticism, he throws around baseless accusations supported by no facts, neither in the reviews nor outside of them. If you don't stop, your presence in this protocol will become meaningless. Source: [“AI slop hit and run”](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/715551) [“fake account detacted”](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/715552)

on 𝙈𝙊𝙃𝘼𝙈𝙈𝘼𝘿 𝘼𝙇𝙄 jiray.base.eth · 1217· 51d ago · negative88

“Too localized”I don't see any potential in Abstract because of their structure. They have made the interface too localized. On top of that, they operate through abstractions. These two factors already make it harder for users to access. Unfortunately, as of today, I don't know what Abstract can offer that other chains can't. Earlier, their intern asked me what they would need to attract new users. I replied that the only thing that could be done is out of their control. In my opinion, they would need one or two flagship projects that could bring an external audience into their ecosystem. For example, something like STEPN was on Solana back in its hype days. But even that seems unrealistic today. I don't believe in their concept. It is hard to convince me that a localized chain aimed at everyday consumers will take off.

on Abstract · 1813· 5mo ago · neutral29

“A dishonest market player”MEXC is merely one of the exchanges that abuses the trust of traders and the Web3 community, manipulating both the markets and AML issues, which gives them a pretext to freeze the accounts of clients with large sums, leaving their assets for themselves as collateral. Over the years, a multitude of cases have been noticed (thousands of cases) with account freezes, monthly and yearly waits for the issue to be resolved. Also, a multitude of cases have been noticed in the manipulation of internal spot and futures markets. Today, I was reminded of this by one of the incidents that just happened to be louder than the others, but not the only one [https://x.com/thewhitewhalev2/status/1983572679715086524] and this is just one reason to leave a negative review. Even though the situation was resolved [https://x.com/thewhitewhalev2/status/1984301224230076498] and even apologies were made [https://x.com/cecilia_hsueh/status/1984291339257647176], all smart people understand that this is a temporary and isolated case, in order to make the strategy of taking funds more sophisticated and to smooth over the edges today. This exchange has never been on my list of trust and never will be.

on MEXC · 957· 12mo ago · negative29

“A Center of Calm and Reason in Crypto”For me, Milania is someone with whom communication is both easy and soothing. We’ve known each other for 2 years, and I’m grateful that we crossed paths in the community. Have you ever met someone who not only thrives in a calm environment but also creates that atmosphere just by being there? That’s her. She has a wide range of interests, but her primary focus is on building a private community, of which I’m fortunate to be a part. Order, harmony, and strategy are the guiding principles of this community, as well as each of its members. The structure is well-organized, with clear divisions for different topics, projects categorized into subtopics, and regular updates and important announcements. She truly embodies the role of a moderator and organizer.

on Milana | ETHGas ⛽ · 1377· 1y ago29

“Your Guide To Abstract”This guy was the reason I got into meme coins within the Abstract ecosystem at the perfect time, allowing me to realize gains in the thousands of percent. He provided the crucial insight for my entry into $PENGU, and his analysis was spot-on for subsequent plays like $ABSTER and others. I managed to exit near the peak, securing significant profits. While I wouldn't call Abstract the pinnacle of seamless user experience, its ecosystem is undeniably flush with capital and opportunities. This potential is exactly what attracts savvy guys like Kostya and myself to it. His ability to navigate this specific landscape is what makes him a valuable connection.

on kostya_medical · 1321· 1y ago29

“AI Researcher.”He is deeply studying the AI trend and genuinely believes it is the future that will seamlessly integrate into our daily lives. Given that blockchain is itself an innovative trend in the economic and financial sector, he argues that anyone who pays attention to AI within blockchain is laying the groundwork for a successful financial future. To some extent, I agree with him. We met while researching the Sahara AI project on their Discord server. He is an erudite and precise individual. For any question related to AI, you will receive a clear and comprehensive answer from him. In this industry, many people read and learn, but very few actively share their knowledge and, by improvising, generate novel ideas. Individuals like Alex, who do exactly that, are incredibly valuable for the growth and innovation of startups.

on ELG · 1468· 1y ago29

“Review does Not reflect reality”In my opinion, the reviews coming from this user do not reflect reality. On March 10th, she [posted](https://ibb.co/7t803jh9) an offer inviting people to write reviews on her Ethos profile. In response, she guaranteed she would do the same. It's no secret that if someone wants a positive review from you, they will write you a positive review. Similarly, if you receive a positive review, there is already a moral obligation to do the same, given the circumstances. I cannot be certain about the reliability of the reviews this user has recently been leaving for other Ethos users. I'll provide just two examples to avoid writing a long post: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/693442/original-and-impactful https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/693441/inspiring-meaningful-and-unforgettable Such actions on Ethos carry a history of negative repercussions and consequences. I suggest you value your opinion and not throw it around carelessly. For us to trust your reviews, we need to understand that they are written impartially and without obligation. Such actions can affect not only you, but also those whom you involve in this. I have no doubt that you are a good content maker with an audience, because the very fact of having many positive reviews confirms this. However, such speculation carries risks for your Credibility Score.

on Rosa · 1132· 7mo ago · negative36

‹ Back132 of 492 · most upvoted firstMore ›