MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓351aadvark↓278Majdi↓263TradeDonald J. Trump↓13.3%Ethos↓1.8%vitalik.eth↑1.0%jeff.hl↑1.0%VouchesTucosalamanca943 WHUF → EthosDpuck (bob)50 WHUF → freshout.ape 🍄🦍MMatt25 WHUF → Rahulxero.hlAnton Boiarchuk10 WHUF → Sk0rp.ethReviewsTbeagle ⨀positive · 24 upvotesBboatpositive · 10 upvotesRahulxero.hlpositive · 8 upvotesSk0rp.ethpositive · 5 upvotes
Profile· Known@0xKharonOn Ethos
ZET

ZET

196 reviews, 96% of them positive; 247 WHUF vouched for them by 8 people.96% positive · 196 reviews· 247 WHUF vouched· Influence factor 15, above 3% of accounts

The record

From 90 activities · Apr 2026

A crypto veteran and rigorous investigator known for thorough sybil detection, human verification work, and evidence-backed reviews on Ethos. Respected for digging into patterns, calling out bad actors with receipts rather than speculation, and maintaining ethical principles across Web3—though some dispute the evidentiary basis of certain accusations. Active mentor and community builder who mentors others on research methodology, writes detailed project analysis, and consistently contributes to ecosystem integrity.

“Sybil Patterns”During the verification process of user [Sanjeeb](https://app.ethos.network/profile/0xAb9109a40A8D499794ff4f82233cC5F0aE82b5CE) and the analysis of his environment, at least two accounts were identified that raise suspicions and exhibit patterns characteristic of Sybil behavior. In this review, I will mention only one account that can be considered an alternative account belonging to user Gojo. Because of this, I was forced to [deny](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/705920/suspicious-user-human-verification) Sanjeeb verification on my behalf. There are grounds to believe that the [Noira](https://app.ethos.network/profile/0x51a76aA71e08B981E915A47fEA20B45d7Ff0Cba0) profile belongs to Gojo. The supporting arguments include on-chain links, social behavior on X (publication of EVM addresses), and screenshots whose image uniqueness links the two profiles through similarity of the mobile device. Below are quotes from the original verification denial review. "" The EVM address of user Gojo was activated by user Noira (the very first transactions, several of them): 2025/09/23 18:38:47 – [receive](https://etherscan.io/tx/0xfe8826d9acd25a46ebf552e78d2d3e88cbf8065fc07c8bba4c5f6409eaaaeca3). 2025/09/23 18:40:11 – [receive](https://etherscan.io/tx/0x3172bb0462b5b1b599e5a164d6c45fe654cfeaf6f479553594e3b14bfe7988cc). 2025/09/25 19:01:23 – [sends](https://etherscan.io/tx/0x23be2d9ab736368e11f385d2bd7c63f2984dc286277581e0765d9fcfb09faf3c) back almost the full amount of the previous two transactions. I interpret this as an activation of the address on the Ethereum network to start counting the age of the account. After that, several more on-chain interactions occur between these users, and soon they shift through obfuscated CEX transfers. "" During a giveaway in the Monad ecosystem, EVM addresses were mixed up. Gojo repeatedly [published](https://ghostarchive.org/archive/rW8My) Noira's address. Noira repeatedly [published](https://ghostarchive.org/archive/4R4gC) Gojo addres. Posting occur [both](https://ghostarchive.org/archive/9XLMj) on different days and on the [same](https://ghostarchive.org/archive/dg8RT) day. To say here, "I asked a friend because I couldn't do it myself" - is impossible. The following should also be mentioned: another pattern. The use of two identical phones, where the similarity is explained by the browser color scheme, browser type, operating system type, and connection type. On February 22, 2025, Gojo publishes a [post](https://megalodon.jp/2026-0531-0547-27/https://x.com:443/gojo0204hm/status/1893280188034674896). On Oct 31, 2025, Noira publishes a message with a screenshot on the Ritual project server. A [chat](https://ibb.co/0yTV9Cpb) screenshot. The [original](https://ibb.co/0VzY1WRS) screenshot. Identical laptops: model, color scheme, panel condition (icon layout, organization), interface. On September 11, 2025, Noira [posts](https://megalodon.jp/2026-0601-1513-33/https://x.com:443/lezot02/status/1965834232854646887) a photo of a laptop display. On November 1, 2025, Gojo [posts](https://megalodon.jp/2026-0601-1546-48/https://x.com:443/gojo0204hm/status/1984482203884253298) a photo of a laptop display, confirming the manufacturer's brand. On August 21, 2025, Noira [posts](https://ghostarchive.org/archive/EMhLU) confirming the manufacturer's model. On May 28, 2026, a more [detailed](https://megalodon.jp/2026-0601-1512-29/https://x.com:443/gojo0204hm/status/2059981334022603084) view of the laptop from Gojo. The posts on X are also similar in terms of writing style. //// Both users leave positive reviews for Sanjeeb, and neither gets a review back from him. He refers to both of them as his friends. Sanjeeb was also [observed](https://ibb.co/VWb8qhcF) on the Monad Discord server simultaneously chatting with Animesh and Noira. Only [Animesh](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/697936/warning-user-controlling-two-profiles) (who was exposed for sybiling) received a mutual review from Sanjeeb. The original post also contains other profiles that likely require further scrutiny.on GOJO.base.eth · 1054· 5mo ago · negative21
“DataHaven, a project that shut down”Despite the project having an idea, a concept, development work, and community growth programs, the project announced its closure after failing to find a way out of the situation it was in. The TGE did not take place. The """"community"""" that was farming the token through activities was unhappy with this decision. However, it seems to me that the team made the right choice by not letting the situation get worse with the addition of another variable, a token that would have had no financial backing, no liquidity, and not even mid-tier exchanges. They stopped in time. [Article](https://x.com/DataHaven_xyz/status/2029236252520874059) by DataHaven: __DataHaven is shutting down: a letter to the community__ To our community, This is the hardest message we’ve ever had to write. After exhausting every path forward, we’ve made the decision to shut down DataHaven. But we want you to know that this wasn’t just a company to us. It wasn’t just a product or a token or a roadmap. DataHaven was our life for the past year. It was early mornings and late nights. It was conversations at the dinner table. It was stress, hope, conviction, and belief all wrapped into one. We believed deeply in what we were building. We believed the world needed private, verifiable, user-controlled storage, especially in an era where AI is reshaping everything. We believed users deserved control over their data. We believed infrastructure could be both powerful and ethical. And we believed we could build it. And for a while, it felt like we were. You showed up in ways that honestly humbled us. You supported us relentlessly. You uploaded millions of files. You gave feedback. You asked hard questions. You made the best content we’ve ever seen. You learned with us. So many of you—especially the friends beyond the MooseDoor and the most loyal community members—spent countless hours alongside us. Because you believed alongside us. As this winds down, we hope we were able to educate some of you along the way. About privacy. About verifiable storage. About content creation and social presence. About the realities of building in web3. Many of you now understand things you didn’t before. And that knowledge doesn’t disappear just because this chapter is ending. Over the past months, we worked relentlessly to find a sustainable path to TGE and beyond. We explored funding. We explored partnerships. We explored alternative token structures. We reworked our strategy. We looked at every possibility and called in every favor for advice with every founder we knew. We fought for it. But eventually, we reached a painful conclusion: we do not see a responsible path forward. We could have forced a TGE. We would have launched into uncertainty and hoped the market would turn around. But if that failed, it wouldn’t just hurt us—it would hurt you. And we were not willing to put financial pressure or hardship onto the very community that trusted us. This decision hurts. We’re letting go of something we poured ourselves into. There will be frustration. There will be disappointment. We understand that. We feel it, too. But please know this was never indifference. It was never laziness. It was never a lack of belief. It was the opposite. We believed in DataHaven enough to not cheapen it with a rushed ending. To every loyal community member who stayed up with us. To every MooseDoor contributor. To every person who defended us, educated others, or gave us grace when things were messy. Thank you. We are proud of what we built together. Even if it didn’t reach the finish line we imagined, it was real. It was ambitious. It was honest. The discord, telegram, network, and everything associated with DataHaven will be shutting down. We just want to say: We gave this everything we had. We are grateful for you. And we’re sorry we couldn’t take it further. The DataHaven Teamon DataHaven 🫎 · 1119· 8mo ago · neutral21
‹ Back180 of 492 · most upvoted firstMore ›