ZET

196 reviews, 96% of them positive; 247 WHUF vouched for them by 8 people.96% positive · 196 reviews· 247 WHUF vouched· Influence factor 15, above 3% of accounts

The record

From 90 activities · Apr 2026

A crypto veteran and rigorous investigator known for thorough sybil detection, human verification work, and evidence-backed reviews on Ethos. Respected for digging into patterns, calling out bad actors with receipts rather than speculation, and maintaining ethical principles across Web3—though some dispute the evidentiary basis of certain accusations. Active mentor and community builder who mentors others on research methodology, writes detailed project analysis, and consistently contributes to ecosystem integrity.

What people say

Received · 196 Given · 492

“It's very easy to lose all your money”Of course, it comes down to individual self-control, but no one is immune to getting hooked by the thrill of gambling, losing part of their money, and then, in an attempt to win it back, losing absolutely everything. The mechanics of on-chain, staking, and the like seem interesting. BUT, this thing literally offers you the chance to spend minimum 0.05 SOL every 60 seconds to try your luck at a 1/30 chance. I wouldn't consider this project as a lottery for myself personally, however, it could be looked at as a short-term speculative investment, LP, or staking. As long as this project feeds the gambling itch and as long as people haven't run out of their last dollar, the token has potential. This is absolutely not financial advice, just an opinion and some thoughts. I recently looked into the mechanics of this thing and I was impressed. Essentially, it's the perfect "casino". You've got to envy the owners.

on ZINC · 1331· 4mo ago · neutral20

“Tried to restore his reputation, but something went wrong”Recently, Waqas has been trying to restore his reputation. He admitted to creating one alternative account. He contacted me in DMs, and I advised him on the correct course of action. After that, he wrote a [neutral](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/706239/invited-by-mistake) review on his alt and returned the XP by [transferring](https://app.ethos.network/activity/sent-xp/13157/https-app-ethos-network-activity-review-706239-invited-by-mistake) it to the project profile. Lately, I've seen him trying to write higher quality reviews than before, occasionally visiting the project's Discord server, as well as addressing positive reviews to trusted Ethos contributors. Today we got in touch again, and he asked me to help verify him because everyone keeps rejecting him. I asked him a couple of questions regarding his past actions, such as writing positive reviews for sybil accounts and accepting mutual reviews from them. He explained this by saying he was in a review coordination community. I cannot rule out this possibility, since many communities are exactly focused on that, talking about grinding. In general, many projects, through their point-based campaigns, have raised an entire cluster of airdrop enthusiasts who grind everything they possibly can. I believed him and [archived](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/702230/has-a-connection-to-a-sybil-network) my negative review. Was going to write a neutral one with an explanation. HOWEVER, I couldn't shake the feeling that something was off. I became curious about when his X account was banned and when it was unbanned, in order to understand the motives for inviting the account and writing positive reviews in the context of bounties. The dates didn't add up; he got confused in them while trying to deceive me in order to create a positive impression of himself. ! He explained the creation of the account by saying that his X account on his main profile was permanently banned and he did not know what to do, so he created an alternative account in Ethos. I wasn't against helping him, and I respect his desire to fix his reputation, but not through deceiving me. He provided a screenshot showing that his account was banned on April 11, 2026. According to him, his account was unbanned in the middle of May (around the 11th–15th). The AT Drops account was invited by him on May 5th (before the unban, according to him). However, there is a [negative review](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/701765?replyId=69273) from user Tempe. In the comments, he attached a screenshot confirming that at the time the alt account was invited, Waqas's X account was not banned. In response, Waqas commented that his account had been unbanned on February 5th. The [screenshot](https://ibb.co/C5LHSf96) itself shows an unequivocal ban of an X account with feedback ignored due to the reason provided. This screenshot likely belongs to a different account. It turns out that Waqas tried to mislead me and hoped that through deception he could fix everything. But alas. Whatever the truth may be, it's obvious that this guy is very unlucky.

on Waqas · 1264· 5mo ago · negative20

“Sybil Account”This account belongs to a different owner, who voluntarily revealed themselves after realizing their mistake. Original confession [review](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/691364/fixing-my-mistake).

on ABBY (Abbs) · 1203· 8mo ago · negative20

on Nomad☠️ · 1225· 8mo ago · negative20

“AI-generated spam reviews”Hey buddy, contributing through reviews is certainly a good thing, but you wrote 5 medium-sized reviews in 6 minutes. There's no value in this if your reviews aren't coming from you and are just generated by an AI chat with a simple command. Screen: [https://ibb.co/q3mstyKZ] Examples: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/686178/from-token-to-powerhouse https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/686175/insightful-voice-in-web-3 https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/686172/clean-design-powerful-performance https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/686173/built-for-digital-ownership https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/686168/the-foundation-of-decentralized-innovation https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/686169/empty-promises-costly-lessons https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/686167/rewards-that-actually-matter Let's make things better while we still can.

on 69. degen.eth · 1184· 8mo ago · negative20

“One of the most notorious scam accounts belonging to the Ardizor group”This group engages in scam schemes targeting a naive audience on Twitter. They promote scam tokens, memecoins, and projects for personal enrichment.

on ᴛʀᴀᴄᴇʀ · 1137· 9mo ago · negative20

“A useful tool that has helped many”I've used this thing about 100 times over the years, and I think every experienced and active crypto enthusiast understands how important the features of this application are and how they help in securing your funds and addresses. I'm amazed that even in the most popular and widely used Web3 wallets, there is no function for revoking smart contract permissions.

on Revoke.cash · 1696· 1y ago20

“A Valuable Community Member”I know this guy from the closed community "From Zero to Zero in Crypto", which I joined three years before him. While for me, many newcomers are rookies who come for experience and success stories, Serkot constantly makes valuable contributions. He does it as if this is now his home and family. This guy lives there and keeps the chat's pulse from dropping. Valuable insights, tactics, charts, new ventures, and ideas. It's all him. Every community needs people like this to stay alive and develop. Respect.

on Serkot (❖,❖) · 1292· 1y ago20

“A Trusted Voice in the Chaos”I've known Alexander for three years now. Our paths keep crossing across different Discord servers and Telegram groups. It feels like we're both drawn to the same interesting corners of the crypto world. He's the kind of person who's not just smart, but genuinely great to talk to. Everyone I know respects him, and it's easy to see why. You can always count on him for a solid market insight, some help when you're stuck, or even to jump into a new venture together. In a space where it's hard to know who to trust, Alexander is that rare reliable person. Really glad our paths crossed.

on SashaT.base.eth 🟦 · 1341· 1y ago20

“Ambiguous Opinion”He has never been in my info-flow, but I’ve heard about the drama with DeGods. Strange things happened throughout this story, including the hack of the address after his departure and the migration into the meme narrative. It’s up to him to decide who he wants to be and what he wants to do, but people shouldn’t be harmed because of it. His behavior has affected both his own reputation (questionable) and the situation of those who followed him.

on Frank · 1086· 5mo ago · neutral25

on A THE DEGEN · 1259· 8mo ago · negative25

“The first that matches quality, demand, and reliability”Base L2 from Coinbase is, in my opinion, likely the first that has managed to earn trust and build a truly reliable and useful ecosystem of applications around itself. I don't know of any other EVM chain that enjoys such popularity. Essentially, the chain fully aligns with the needs of the market and users, while continuing to build quality infrastructure.

on Base · 1873· 8mo ago24

‹ Back204 of 492 · most upvoted firstMore ›