ZET

197 reviews, 96% of them positive; 247 WHUF vouched for them by 8 people.96% positive · 197 reviews· 247 WHUF vouched· Influence factor 15, above 3% of accounts

The record

From 91 activities · Apr 2026

ZET is a crypto veteran and active Ethos contributor known for rigorous sybil investigations, thorough human verification, and evidence-backed reviews that expose bad actors and XP farmers. Reviewers consistently praise their detailed research, mentorship, and commitment to ecosystem integrity—though some critics argue certain slashes rely on assumptions rather than on-chain proof. A respected community leader who runs the "From Zero" trading community and shares sharp market analysis across X and Telegram, valued for honest takes on projects, tokenomics, and privacy coins like Monero and Zcash.

What people say

Received · 197 Given · 494

“A Rising Star in the Crypto Community”His nickname translates to "The Lucky One." This guy has been part of our private community for two years now. During this time, he has adapted so quickly that it feels like crypto is what he was born for. We've explored projects together like Arkham, Story Protocol and today we're looking into Re, as they have a certain interest in what's happening in Ethos. For me, this is a signal from both sides because I've started to notice how Ethos is smoothly integrating into SocialFi, attracting partners on an emotional and reputational level of interest.

on VizZun4ik · 1263· 1y ago19

“Review System Abuse / Unethical Behavior”This user is an admin of the [Altura](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/709156) project's Discord server. On January 27, 2026, he organized a task to write exclusively [positive reviews](https://ibb.co/KzQ4Z4mF) on his project. In reward for this, in-system project points are offered. This action is nothing other than falsification of the profile's credibility score. In addition, the project itself had a number of negative reviews earlier, in which public doubts about Altura were expressed. Fake fundraising, scamming, and frequent changes of the official Twitter account username were mentioned. In response to criticism directed at the project, this user retaliates with [negative reviews](https://megalodon.jp/2026-0621-2316-18/https://app.ethos.network:443/activity/review/655437/spam-account) containing baseless accusations. This was the case with the user [FIREREXZIMA](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/655667). It is possible that the organization of a task with rewards for positive reviews was intended to hide community doubts.

on Leads · 1215· 4mo ago · negative15

“He moved his alt account into Ethos and thinks no one will notice it”The behavior in Ethos, timestamps, and on-chain connections indicate that the [Leon_monad](https://app.ethos.network/profile/0x0837C965E26C6814CC2e75B1FB7a4133cc62572b) account belongs to him. At the moment, both have applied for Human verification. SURPRISINGLY, both accounts received positive reviews from Ethos participants. This likely requires further investigation.

on Leonman.eth · 1252· 5mo ago · negative15

“Part of the sybil network / has ties to it”Details [here](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/704266/poorly-conceals-his-sybil-farm) Anyone interested in a more detailed investigation, I suggest studying the on-chain and social connections between all the accounts through reviews/vouches and invites.

on Petr · 1160· 5mo ago · negative15

on boul45greg · 1176· 5mo ago · negative15

on suneoleg❤️ · 1199· 5mo ago · negative15

“Abuse of the Community”I am partially a stakeholder in relation to their project. I got acquainted with what they were building at a very early stage. One person from my team invested a significant amount of money into running nodes during the initial phases of the testnet. His decision to provide funding was made for technical reasons. The team clearly understood the costs that node operators were incurring. In every phase, there were issues that the team was slow to fix. Node operators suffered significant losses at the time of the listing and TGE. Other community directions also suffered the consequences of the team’s negligent attitude. Given that the project has significant fundraising from VCs, while the costs of maintaining nodes and validation are borne by the node operators, I understand the following: - The team decided to save as much of the budget as possible and deliberately did not account for the costs incurred by node operators.

on Nexus · 1083· 5mo ago · negative15

“Part of the Sybil network”This account belongs to a single owner who manages multiple Ethos profiles. Cluster list: https://app.ethos.network/profile/0x0298c27dB135B5b091e9243cB4471795691BBfE4 https://app.ethos.network/profile/0x3a49D4311be69875Fe217C4fFa8CE15Edae79a98 https://app.ethos.network/profile/0xC1d40e06C92384576fd2FaBd8D7CB6524B1F3b19 https://app.ethos.network/profile/0xCfAE267070179E992B93f60BcD12C53a213EbE73 https://app.ethos.network/profile/0xBF9f08Aa8F8bBc82264135bEfF2d11b34D41295D https://app.ethos.network/profile/0x79C39C34BbE7C31f8dC0c9e60F307f32499176c6 https://app.ethos.network/profile/0xd4D23C9E549A8ceCD795f5a430127335a1905B06

on Ramzez969 · 1228· 7mo ago · negative15

“Bad Actor - Additional Investigation by Eye (№1)”Below is the full quote from a [post](https://x.com/eyeonchains/status/2027850554714820919) by a user [Eye](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/eyeonchains), with addresses and links to other Ethos profiles. "" [@TroveMarkets](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/TroveMarkets) case update: many people have understandably reached out asking how the investigation is progressing. Since I’m currently the only one still actively working on this case, I want to make one thing clear first despite my lack of public updates since my last post, I have remained fully active behind the scenes and have continued to brief the authorities on every new movement. Since my last update, I have uncovered that several external actors part of the Trove team have been assisting [@unwisecap](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/unwisecap) in attempting to distract victims from the real parties involved. These actors have received significant sums from the stolen funds and have acted maliciously, despite already having histories of involvement in various crypto related scams What truly disgusted me is discovering that some of the very victims I was trying to help have simultaneously turned into villains. Confidentially, they obtained reimbursements directly from [@unwisecap](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/unwisecap) and [@0xfrenship](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/0xfrenship) by leveraging personal information they possess and effectively blackmailing them to recover their funds without sharing any of the intelligence they hold that could help recover funds for everyone. This is selfish and unethical behavior, especially considering many of them publicly present themselves as innocent angels. All companies that had any involvement with Trove despite their presumed innocence, as none of them could have reasonably anticipated what would happen failed to step up when it mattered. None released statements nor did they meaningfully respond to my outreach, often replying vaguely and with visible annoyance. I am referring in particular to the audit firm [@zenith256](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/zenith256), which did not even grant me a response, and the platform where the seed round had initially been planned (and later canceled), [@Tachyonfund](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/Tachyonfund). I am not accusing them of complicity in the scam but Im highlighting a significant lack of cooperation for investigative purposes and in the effort to reconstruct events and gather useful information for authorities. Despite the situation, many victims have downplayed the effort I have dedicated to this investigation while fully crediting others who initially contributed leads that, as of now, have produced no meaningful progress. At this stage, the people who have genuinely supported the investigation are a subset of Trove victims and individuals close to me who despite not losing anything themselves stepped forward and provided valuable intelligence that helped reconstruct many key steps of the scam. I will continue to thank them for their efforts. These contributions have led to the collection of very interesting intelligence, including the reconstruction of Unwisecap’s travel patterns with specific dates and cities visited during the Trove pre launch phase. It also revealed how the scam strategy appears to have been planned from the outset through manipulation and deception, using good-faith individuals as layers of separation to avoid direct exposure. This includes the agreements he made with the external LP regarding the well known $20M raise which now appears to have been structured as a high interest loan. The Trove story is far more complex than it may appear at first glance. It was a long-term, multi-phase operation designed to exploit the networks of multiple individuals, attend conferences to aggressively promote the product, and attract attention to the project. It also appears to involve a Chinese lending network behind the so called raise, where the liquidity provider may have been the second party with access to the funds alongside Unwise. In addition to the $1,8M already withdrawn to CEXs in the days following the Trove launch, over the past three weeks they moved 3,2M DAI from the multisig address 0x787571c7e0b2fC0BCF64c75bC98BF842Eef8107D to the following addresses: 0x2b1eA378B85cF50F6bE3FEC19873bcD73a2Da800 0x34C4EbFF26cB4C1C4a690855e8884D94C38D08f0 0xA900F73A4Def6e05e3653787931192712aD75d8d 0x037e3BB78427B2B91aFd8BFab0f748F9D07601e7 0x171Ca339b69eb2E09D5658B89A4ed0622b8092B0 via Thorchain the funds were swapped into BTC and received at the following addresses: bc1qwxqf7c3h9snq2sfelkphha5ja6j085ayk6sv34 bc1qw5t52xhc5d8dj6lr948uaguceasuaw8vq3mtsh bc1qh58qm4k2ztjz9ahdgu4wzlw9vfzcxv2wwtlgjq bc1qt4t6e84keychlvevdaz6jlshvq2ez9lxzafn63 bc1qn9zm3kg48z95rh5j90vdjwnvq4czlvntknulyq bc1qfwefqk8ngad3j9sgtnwr934xuelk0au6j3x26a bc1bc1qpv4as2lcnlmk3kzkw0z3lyd4a66e50kdlpqvlr From these BTC addresses, the funds were distributed across multiple destinations: part was mixed, another small fraction moved through OTC trades, another portion was converted into XMR via Codex[.]io, while approximately 70% of the BTC was deposited directly into the following CEX deposit addresses: HTX Deposit 1FJQZ1Tmh2NFcsieS1E2vTYgAkxY8WwRua 17Sfb3bXqR8jmK3mM52xGzosMAvUcBtHVb 1CdUhTei7Ciem7xMvn924rtG4aSfSkWxqL 16uW8BGqsCosXjPHTQQuEJvDjULGJtwKep 1FqdabKqjNxkvX9tWFDoLq12gvj3ybfSYx 16rw2GiaBNTm8FykAJg8th6MMuoQx4MZhS KuCoin Deposit bc1qgus6z5zxk9e93j4s0cplqmqx6f3pcuurs5and0 bc1qjnch4pwk32cqa9xdpg76fxrj72zj55zqpr7r3c bc1qjy04jfun2w3ywpqvrk8mem78xpsyyg6uv9gvj2 38CSGjsUQudTVRHh9FphuqBwum7tV8cvTW 32HFeV2pYN9Qzx5m34JhZkJa4hei2yVW3F 3DAKdK8qj2uoZZpJZxzvHpH3zmUYHsDF5d 33v6RbDV6BxeqT4ZtA1hHKy4BS1aJCtJfK 3G9q2bJQMjw9xXgZ8dCxR1N1NLoSh6LqFC 3Hm6oWMniu2v9CATDvSML8ZL18qtThtrDx 35cwGXpYNd2pweP9KmW5JbDFjRRFJAN7SX Kraken Deposit 32bhKhnCTkP9RWFn3Vz39YFZSrf79qJmBx 36jq6N2wRMdt187EAaKuyocfPY6TTpLgrS 35VbSaacS6QH76FAZJ5QZCZ8h8vPN1hjht 3D5fD1o3nW4WVEug5CEvDwuhopdVJcEDza 37UJQ8bhG7RrK1U7pZoyuykC5JVpFn7NWZ Gate[.]io Deposit 1CUS1yptXnM4LTkvjaCCpMzs7dDLM4SUbA LBank Deposit bc1qycws7rcw2hm7s8weq2g27k8cg80f4wx2lutgdm bc1q2n5scaqjwqsk5225ahfeall3u9tlp2wef2jrt4 Bybit Deposit 16DJRtKi2m25uAtUe29Bs7B57gZRpjPJ6k CoinEx Deposit bc1qm2nenjteetn2h48jeftvfvvhwhy9vu0ly7wvwu bc1qfrdry7n0fzyy0c690rg926gwnntzjc3aeqldj9 bc1q5ns84ug9swncyalq2suacwr7fxfg3saa9xgjmd bc1qtkguux7cd8husqwr4fclhkh2ea2su0cmy948yp bc1qu8p4rnsnyujlk4hedcrv827fegvl6jca2nsnye bc1qrr5mdwn0my77kuvh0sqf3hy4x0z6de725g36n7 bc1q8k8h05cyj8lkpxsypds65dqg2sw2wske44rxtc I have fully mapped the fund flows and reported them to the relevant authorities worldwide who are working on this case. I have also contacted the compliance officers of the following CEXs to request the immediate freezing of the funds. I reiterate my appeal to these platforms: you are receiving stolen funds, and the accounts being used are mule accounts purchased through fraudulent groups. Some of these deposit addresses have already been used by other users and appear to be genuine accounts that could be linked to the organization behind the scam. The LP is associated with highly questionable criminal actors and activities. As I have stated privately to some victims, I will continue to follow this case and pursue all currently open leads with the objective of ensuring the responsible parties end up exactly where they belong Eye

on unwise · 875· 8mo ago · negative15

on unwise · 875· 8mo ago · negative15

“A fork of OlympusDAO is now on MegaETH”I think the project's Score is prematurely inflated. At least because practically nothing is known about it. Currently, there is no product, but there will be an upcoming token sale. I don't know what guides people when they write positive reviews. Link to the fork: [https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/OlympusDAO] Now ask yourself, why does a new project (Blackhaven) have a Score of almost 1500, while the main project, which has existed since 2021, has a Score of 1355.

on Blackhaven · 1416· 8mo ago · neutral15

“Fictitious project”A project created with the aim of laundering money for Alameda. The team was assembled solely for appearances. They received investments from Solana and Polygon a few years ago, but suspended their activities after the issues with FTX. At the helm, as the face of the project, they presented a person who has nothing to do with Web3 and struggles with gambling addiction [ https://x.com/__BLAZAR__ ]. The focus was solely on artistic experience and an unusual appearance. At least 30 million dollars have been raised. Twitter activity has practically been suspended; previously, the agenda included only AMAs with the founder on the topic of "What is blockchain good for?" and similar discussions. Today, their hope is that amidst all this chaos, everyone has almost forgotten about them.

on Cosmic Wire · 1197· 12mo ago · negative15

‹ Back264 of 494 · most upvoted firstMore ›