MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓351aadvark↓288Majdi↓263TradeDonald J. Trump↓13.3%Bold↑1.7%Itsakm8↑2.6%Serpin Taxt↑1.0%VouchesAnton Boiarchuk10 WHUF → Sk0rp.ethCole West8 WHUF → zypherxbtCristian P.5 WHUF → chosta.ethstellarobject5 WHUF → 0xGeeGeeReviewsPendlepositive · 86 upvotesAnton Boiarchukpositive · 67 upvotesShuyao Kongnegative · 54 upvotesWildcallnegative · 46 upvotes
Profile· Known@0xKharonOn Ethos
ZET

ZET

197 reviews, 96% of them positive; 247 WHUF vouched for them by 8 people.96% positive · 197 reviews· 247 WHUF vouched· Influence factor 15, above 3% of accounts

The record

From 91 activities · Apr 2026

ZET is a crypto veteran and active Ethos contributor known for rigorous sybil investigations, thorough human verification, and evidence-backed reviews that expose bad actors and XP farmers. Reviewers consistently praise their detailed research, mentorship, and commitment to ecosystem integrity—though some critics argue certain slashes rely on assumptions rather than on-chain proof. A respected community leader who runs the "From Zero" trading community and shares sharp market analysis across X and Telegram, valued for honest takes on projects, tokenomics, and privacy coins like Monero and Zcash.

“Co-CEO of Cosmos Labs”He has held this position for over a year. He became CEO after the acquisition of Skip, the protocol he had been working at. Essentially, this served as a springboard for him into the role, since Skip was a flagship team that built high-quality products (they had a strong staff). After becoming CEO, he shifted the focus to enterprise. He receives both criticism and positive feedback from the community. However, it was under his leadership that Cosmos began to stagnate (and he inherited it in an already poor state). Many projects either migrated or withered away. To give a simple example, the well-known Kujira rebranded to [Rujira](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/RujiraNetwork) and moved to [THORChain](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/THORChain). [Elys](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/elys_network) shut down and migrated under a new brand to Base. And there are many such stories. However, it would be fair to point out that he is specifically the co-CEO, alongside [Barry Plunkett](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/BPIV400), who also moved to Cosmos Labs after the acquisition. Be that as it may, this guy is trying to patch a leaky boat on the fly and make it to some shore. Many are waiting for [Cosmos](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/cosmos) to bring value to the ATOM token, but economically this has not yet been achieved. Cosmos SDK is free and open-source, and many who use it often abstract themselves from any connection to Cosmos. For example, Cronos, SEI, Celestia.on magmar 🇺🇸 · 1295· 6mo ago · neutral164
“Community Context”The technical side of the Re project is genuinely impressive. It's a niche project with real demand and a viable insurance model. However, in light of recent events, I believe it is appropriate to supplement their Ethos profile with a negative review. The sharp shift in strategy, from building a community and acquiring typical users through it to directly targeting the financial user segment, has significantly damaged relationships with community representatives, particularly those who represented, grew, and developed the project's concepts. The primary reason for this negative review is the project team's ATTITUDE toward the community curator's work. After community programs were discontinued, they began ignoring him, expressed no gratitude, and simply refused to engage. This provoked a wave of indignation, especially given that the community leader was a volunteer enthusiast, dedicating up to 10 hours a day to the project's image and its social development. The Re team does not value the work of others, not even the work done sincerely and from the heart. For me, this is a sign of ignorance and disrespect towards those who are building Web3 today. This behavior may just be the tip of the iceberg, hinting at deeper issues in their approach to business relationships and networking. In my opinion, the only language they understand is that of profit. Additional materials: [https://x.com/miketwinks/status/2015164934468895189] [https://x.com/miketwinks/status/2014819048328974818] A slash-round was previously organized against Re, accusing them of review speculation, which confirmed Mike's involvement as the community curator. The participation of both him and the project team representatives in the discussion only confirms the fact of their close connection and collaboration: [https://app.ethos.network/activity/slash/268/trying-to-manipulate-their-ethos-reputation] I had previously left a detailed positive review for this project, focusing on its community building and brand recognition. At the time, I stated that the community's contribution should be respected and fairly valued. Today, however, I see no fairness here, nor any gratitude.on Re · 1471· 9mo ago · negative18
‹ Back276 of 494 · most upvoted firstMore ›