MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓351aadvark↓288Majdi↓263TradeDonald J. Trump↓13.3%Bold↑1.7%Itsakm8↑2.6%Serpin Taxt↑1.0%VouchesAnton Boiarchuk10 WHUF → Sk0rp.ethCole West8 WHUF → zypherxbtCristian P.5 WHUF → chosta.ethstellarobject5 WHUF → 0xGeeGeeReviewsPendlepositive · 87 upvotesAnton Boiarchukpositive · 67 upvotesShuyao Kongnegative · 56 upvotesWildcallnegative · 46 upvotes
Profile· Known@0xKharonOn Ethos
ZET

ZET

197 reviews, 96% of them positive; 247 WHUF vouched for them by 8 people.96% positive · 197 reviews· 247 WHUF vouched· Influence factor 15, above 3% of accounts

The record

From 91 activities · Apr 2026

ZET is a crypto veteran and active Ethos contributor known for rigorous sybil investigations, thorough human verification, and evidence-backed reviews that expose bad actors and XP farmers. Reviewers consistently praise their detailed research, mentorship, and commitment to ecosystem integrity—though some critics argue certain slashes rely on assumptions rather than on-chain proof. A respected community leader who runs the "From Zero" trading community and shares sharp market analysis across X and Telegram, valued for honest takes on projects, tokenomics, and privacy coins like Monero and Zcash.

“A typical engagement farmer with a gullible audience”This particular actor appeared in the information space quite recently with posts criticizing MEXC. I am critical of this exchange and know about many instances where user funds were frozen and support dragged things out for months or even years, but these recent publications from him targeting the exchange cross the line of reasonable behavior and look like a contrived fake aimed at attracting attention. Here are a couple of links: [https://x.com/MikeZillionaire/status/2025216998876348647] [https://x.com/MikeZillionaire/status/2025029220666380545] The main and most high-profile incident happened not too long ago, involving a user with the handle WhiteWhale. His grievance was real, as was the freezing of $3 million, after which he gained recognition and participated in the creation of a memecoin of the same name on Solana. My previous review: [https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/636725/public-whale] This whole mosaic ultimately points to the fact that some bad actors, exploiting MEXC's poor reputation, want to replicate the success story of gaining community trust (as WhiteWhale did) in order to use it for personal enrichment and benefit in the future. Incidentally, it seems to me that MEXC does indeed hire bots to maintain its reputation, as they even react to this fake with justifications. Take a look at this example: [https://x.com/realspill0001/status/2025262064852234539] [https://x.com/realspill0001/status/2025265587539055018] [https://x.com/realspill0001/status/2025265039876218901] [https://x.com/realspill0001/status/2025264356892475472] [https://x.com/realspill0001/status/2025263756247257114] [https://x.com/realspill0001/status/2025263098043482568] We live in interesting times.on ZILLIONAIRE (33%)💰💸 · 1206· 8mo ago · negative14
“The reviews do not correspond to reality”In this review from him for the user Sam, the following text is included: "Sam has shared many great projects airdrop opportunities on X. His posts are useful clear genuinely helpful for anyone exploring Web3." [https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/674338/reliable-airdrop] But if you go to Sam's X account [https://x.com/samir89842425], you will see that the account's posts have zero engagement and none of them contain any helpful or clear content for at least the last two years. I regard his review as false and misleading to people. Around the same time, he received a review in response from Sam, which contains the following: "Faiyaz Takkar focuses on crypto education and market awareness rather than quick signals. His content helps users understand trends risks and long term strategies. making it useful for people who want to build strong crypto knowledge." [https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/675620/faiyaz-takkar-crypto-education-and-market-awareness] But if you go to faiyaz's X account [https://x.com/faiyazmumbaikar], you will see that his account has almost no activity, and there is practically nothing in his posts that even remotely corresponds to the review from Sam. To me, this constitutes an abuse of reviews. Reading this, I cannot reliably assess the trustworthiness of a person based on Ethos reviews, which in itself breaks the entire mechanism, and that should not be the case.on faiyaz takkar · 1277· 8mo ago · negative14
‹ Back288 of 494 · most upvoted firstMore ›