ZET

196 reviews, 96% of them positive; 246 WHUF vouched for them by 7 people.96% positive · 196 reviews· 246 WHUF vouched· Influence factor 15, above 3% of accounts

The record

From 91 activities · Apr 2026

ZET is a crypto veteran and active Ethos contributor known for rigorous sybil investigations, thorough human verification, and evidence-backed reviews that prioritize ecosystem integrity over hype. Respected for mentoring others on research methodology, calling out bad actors and XP farmers, and maintaining principled, critical analysis across Web3 projects—though some dispute the evidentiary basis of certain slashes and accusations. A consistent community builder who values ethics, transparency, and honest discourse in crypto.

What people say

Received · 196 Given · 492

“Made a significant contribution to Ethos”I believe Ethos stands above all other protocols because it represents a comprehensive ethic that extends to everyone. By contributing to this protocol, you are bringing ethics to all of web3. Based on this, I think Capi has an impeccable reputation, and I can leave him a positive review with a clear conscience. He is an honest and honorable man. In the old days, he really brought the heat here, and even I had some heated discussions with him. Throughout those, he conducted himself with dignity, restraint, and respect. I value people who can firmly stand their ground while also listening to others' perspectives, and those are the kind of people I truly respect.

on Capi 🐂🐸 (vigilante arc) · 1534· 6mo ago390

“Unethical behavior”In the Merit Systems [product](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/agentcashdev), an enthusiast discovered a bug that allowed unlimited spending to be initiated. The error was covertly fixed, the bug hunter was blocked and denied access to the infrastructure. Details are in the [slash round](https://app.ethos.network/activity/slash/453/) topic. It describes absolutely despicable treatment of a person who reported the problem and helped prevent a future potential exploit worth a large sum. Such actions on the part of the team undermine global trust in both bug bounties and crypto projects as a whole. Today, one bug hunter who was wronged for doing a good deed will become someone who, in the next project, will exploit a vulnerability at their own discretion without reporting it to anyone. The Merit team does not think about such things, and this can be considered recklessness, negligent behavior, and harm to the entire web3 ecosystem.

on Merit Systems · 1060· 4mo ago · negative246

“An excellent web3 contributor”Miya is probably every project's dream and the gold standard of what a true member should be, bringing high-quality, organic contributions. She is well-versed in many aspects of crypto, driven by genuine interest in both cybersecurity and the privacy narrative. Her knowledge and experience are perfectly suited for Ethos, paired with a pure drive for fairness and order. You will never get bored with her, and any conversation is bound to be rich and engaging. Reading her reviews is an absolute pleasure. Every time, it's a new fascinating story. The more people like her there are, the stronger Ethos will become. I'm glad she's with us, on the light side.

on Username McUserface ( ͠° ͟ʖ ͡°) · 1460· 4mo ago119

“It has the characteristics of an alt account”There are reasons to believe that Noira is an alt account operated by the user [Gojo](https://app.ethos.network/profile/0xF870188A7f63E70545eEBA127bf7C50df771338C). The arguments and reasoning are outlined both in the [rejection](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/705920/suspicious-user-human-verification) of user Sanjeeb's verification on Human and in the [review](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/706089/sybil-patterns) addressing Gojo. "" The EVM address of user Gojo was activated by user Noira (the very first transactions, several of them): 2025/09/23 18:38:47 – [receive](https://etherscan.io/tx/0xfe8826d9acd25a46ebf552e78d2d3e88cbf8065fc07c8bba4c5f6409eaaaeca3). 2025/09/23 18:40:11 – [receive](https://etherscan.io/tx/0x3172bb0462b5b1b599e5a164d6c45fe654cfeaf6f479553594e3b14bfe7988cc). 2025/09/25 19:01:23 – [sends](https://etherscan.io/tx/0x23be2d9ab736368e11f385d2bd7c63f2984dc286277581e0765d9fcfb09faf3c) back almost the full amount of the previous two transactions. I interpret this as an activation of the address on the Ethereum network to start counting the age of the account. After that, several more on-chain interactions occur between these users, and soon they shift through obfuscated CEX transfers. "" During a giveaway in the Monad ecosystem, EVM addresses were mixed up. Gojo repeatedly [published](https://ghostarchive.org/archive/rW8My) Noira's address. Noira repeatedly [published](https://ghostarchive.org/archive/4R4gC) Gojo addres. Posting occur [both](https://ghostarchive.org/archive/9XLMj) on different days and on the [same](https://ghostarchive.org/archive/dg8RT) day. To say here, "I asked a friend because I couldn't do it myself" - is impossible. The following should also be mentioned: another pattern. The use of two identical phones, where the similarity is explained by the browser color scheme, browser type, operating system type, and connection type. On February 22, 2025, Gojo publishes a [post](https://megalodon.jp/2026-0531-0547-27/https://x.com:443/gojo0204hm/status/1893280188034674896). On Oct 31, 2025, Noira publishes a message with a screenshot on the Ritual project server. A [chat](https://ibb.co/0yTV9Cpb) screenshot. The [original](https://ibb.co/0VzY1WRS) screenshot. Identical laptops: model, color scheme, panel condition (icon layout, organization), interface. On September 11, 2025, Noira [posts](https://megalodon.jp/2026-0601-1513-33/https://x.com:443/lezot02/status/1965834232854646887) a photo of a laptop display. On November 1, 2025, Gojo [posts](https://megalodon.jp/2026-0601-1546-48/https://x.com:443/gojo0204hm/status/1984482203884253298) a photo of a laptop display, confirming the manufacturer's brand. On August 21, 2025, Noira [posts](https://ghostarchive.org/archive/EMhLU) confirming the manufacturer's model. On May 28, 2026, a more [detailed](https://megalodon.jp/2026-0601-1512-29/https://x.com:443/gojo0204hm/status/2059981334022603084) view of the laptop from Gojo. The posts on X are also similar in terms of writing style. //// Both users leave positive reviews for Sanjeeb, and neither gets a review back from him. He refers to both of them as his friends. Sanjeeb was also [observed](https://ibb.co/VWb8qhcF) on the Monad Discord server simultaneously chatting with Animesh and Noira. Only [Animesh](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/697936/warning-user-controlling-two-profiles) (who was exposed for sybiling) received a mutual review from Sanjeeb. The original post also contains other profiles that likely require further scrutiny.

on Noira · 1187· 5mo ago · negative205

“Socially Active Developer with a Passion for Code”Misha develops games, vibecodes, and maintains a socially active lifestyle in Web3. About three years ago, we became good friends after meeting in one of the ecosystem chats. We later moved to a private group and jointly developed software for LP analytics on DEX. He deserves his reputation, and honestly, Ethos today offers an opportunity without any marketing noise for people to independently recognize and elevate community members to a new level of reputation.

on Valhist · 1734· 8mo ago92

“Great communication”Cuzzo reached out to me for Human verification through my [offer](https://app.ethos.network/broker/post/2319/human-verification) in the brokers section. While examining his profile, social behavior, on-chain connections, and other metrics, I concluded that he is a real person with a clean reputation. He was interested in Ethos long before he joined us, and today that moment has arrived. After passing verification from three members of the Ethos community, he received the Human status, and I congratulate him on that. During our conversation, he listed the tokens he likes and explained why. In his voice, I noticed a genuine involvement in crypto, which today can be considered rare. An energetic, positive person. I wish him success in building connections and making new friends.

on Cuzzo 🛡️ · 1397· 5mo ago302

“Promoter of a scam project (wallet drainer)”The user [RetroChainer](https://megalodon.jp/2026-0528-0526-01/https://app.ethos.network:443/profile/x/RetroChainer) (their current name) has previously been caught supporting a fraudulent project that drained users' wallets. As a result, they received one [negative review](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/701648/promoting-a-fake-polymarket-site-with-a-drainer). During a [slash-round](https://app.ethos.network/activity/slash/434/promoting-a-wallet-drainer) against the other promoter, it was revealed that the manager had contacted them via Telegram and entered into paid promotional [partnerships](https://app.ethos.network/activity/slash/434?replyId=69221). The terms included posts, retweets, and replies. Several examples of past support are shown here. The archive reflects the state at the time of this review. Direct posts from the user may have been deleted earlier, after the project was exposed: [Example](https://ghostarchive.org/archive/LV2Vr), [example](https://ghostarchive.org/archive/O6H7W), [example](https://ghostarchive.org/archive/V2L99), [example](https://ghostarchive.org/archive/W0CEd). Recently, the scam project’s X account became active again, and according to available information, the manager has resumed offering deals through the same communication channels. Based on this, a [slash-round](https://app.ethos.network/activity/slash/439/an-account-created-for-the-drainer-poly-arb) was organized against PolyArbiter (PolyArb). RetroChainer continues to support the scam project through reposts. The likelihood that this is a spontaneous repost is 0% - given that they are a content maker and their entire personal feed is filled with their own publications. Moreover, they have previously been caught engaging in partnerships, and as we all understand, they have a connection to PolyArb’s marketing manager. Below are archived links showing new activity in support of PolyArb by RetroChainer. Link to the [post](https://ghostarchive.org/archive/HNGFX) itself. List of those who [reposted](https://ghostarchive.org/archive/p11nB) it. If earlier the content makers were involved without realizing the nature of the project and its true goals, now that it’s happening again, everything takes on a completely different tone and a far greater seriousness of intent. Based on this assessment, a separate slash-round will likely be organized against this user in the future. The profile must reflect a negative signal, as well as reduce their credibility score.

on RetroChainer · 1291· 5mo ago · negative267

“Spam/scam account”Used for spam mailing, tags users, promotes potentially harmful materials, smart contracts, phishing links, etc. At the time of the review, it has a yellow badge (Company). It's surprising what the badge preview says: authenticity confirmed in 2014.

on Visa Canada · 1183· 3mo ago · negative266

“REVIEW SYSTEM ABUSE, VIOLATION OF ETHOS PRINCIPLES”This project is abusing the review system by [incentivizing](https://ibb.co/KzQ4Z4mF) its community to post positive reviews on its profile. On the Discord server, there is a specific task that rewards 5,000 in-system XP. This task has been active since approximately January 27, 2026, and during this time, the project's profile has received a significant number of positive reviews. The [manipulation](https://ibb.co/pjMP1K3Y) is further confirmed by the review timeline, with a consistent surge starting on the 27th and tapering off afterward. The organizer of this credibility score falsification task is a user under the name [Leads](https://app.ethos.network/profile/0x3E3EA438b761D1C3BE413d8C3252ad0C1F49eB1e) who acts as a community manager and Discord server admin. These actions are unacceptable within Ethos and are viewed in a highly negative light. We stand for clean intentions, transparency, and ethics. The actions of this project represent the complete opposite. In addition, there are several negative reviews left previously that signal the dubious nature of the project and accuse it of serial fraud. The Twitter account has changed its username multiple times. It is worth considering the organization of a slash round. Reviews: [“Look like big scam. Be careful”](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/652556) [“Multiple username change and fake funding”](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/659575) {?} [“multiple username changes”](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/579897)

on Altura · 1349· 4mo ago · negative265

“Hey Sybil!”This account belongs to a Sybil cluster whose scale is not yet known. However, a clear connection to the [Melina](https://app.ethos.network/profile/0xC1bBed64114215BD5cC305d2fFc5B0F91c1f6b3B) profile has been confirmed. Melina has a connected [farcaster](https://farcaster.xyz/masoudxyz) account that appears to be male. Linked to it is the [Twitter](https://megalodon.jp/ref/2026-0604-0158-13/https://farcaster.xyz:443/~api/v2/user-by-username?username=masoudxyz) account [Pele](https://app.ethos.network/profile/0x08B1781f25Db1EE4D4F347707276F4868812A0F7), which is registered with Ethos. Melina herself is a [fake](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/706590/) girl who previously had the same name as the inviter, [Amir](https://app.ethos.network/profile/0x1d7a2928fF1223C953CCE60737D7d882Bd033243). No matter how much Amir/Masoud/Pele/Melina might want to be clever, it’s not working out too well so far. Melina’s profile [archive](https://megalodon.jp/2026-0604-0153-23/https://app.ethos.network:443/profile/x/0xmelina87). Archive of the linked [Farcaster](https://megalodon.jp/ref/2026-0604-0158-13/https://farcaster.xyz:443/~api/v2/user-by-username?username=masoudxyz) profile. Additionally, Pele [publishes](https://megalodon.jp/2026-0604-0348-31/https://x.com:443/0xpele/status/1871846952163479632) Melina's address on X. Shared deposit address: 0xd81143ad8d21c52b5e4c932ddc83e037f9e81593 It has active deposits from the addresses of Melina's [referral](https://app.ethos.network/profile/0xeb3513aC416a33098838517B23b116fCB7eCd604) and from Melina herself + Pele. Among other things, there is another [Amir](https://app.ethos.network/profile/0x568f94d11CE0B5a6bF2D9d3fDFF42eAce811B91c) in the cluster with a linked Discord account that has the username masoud. (The first Amir now has the username Melina, and the Farcaster is also masoud.) Profile [archive](https://megalodon.jp/2026-0604-1433-13/https://app.ethos.network:443/profile/x/jupiterbaz).

on pele🍻 · 1300· 5mo ago · negative228

“A very controversial figure in the community”This individual is a small KOL in Monero's ecosystem, known for toxic and infantile behavior. Despite attention-seeking antics on X, there is some benefit to Monero's visibility coming from him. However, multiple schemes amounting to financial fraud have led to him being caught: money was raised through crowdfunding for projects that were never fully delivered. OTC deals where he acted as an intermediary also resulted in people getting scammed. Today, his reputation is that of a corrupt and unstable influencer. Bans on X have occurred due to Nazi and racist slogans and actions. A small personal following exists, though clashes with the wider Monero space have happened, including a ban from the main Telegram group by its admins. Throughout his entire presence on X, criticism from more positive and influential figures within the space has been constant. Social support comes mostly from his own alt accounts on X, along with a handful of followers from his personal circle. Lately, I've noticed that his posts are reaching beyond the core Monero audience, which could potentially harm others in the future. That's why I decided to leave a note about him here for Ethos users. All my statements are well-founded and match those of many others across the space.

on Mav · 1189· 5mo ago · negative225

on Sanjeeb Das · 1305· 5mo ago · negative222

‹ Back36 of 492 · most upvoted firstMore ›