ZET

197 reviews, 96% of them positive; 247 WHUF vouched for them by 8 people.96% positive · 197 reviews· 247 WHUF vouched· Influence factor 15, above 3% of accounts

The record

From 91 activities · Apr 2026

ZET is a crypto veteran and active Ethos contributor known for rigorous sybil investigations, thorough human verification, and evidence-backed reviews that expose bad actors and XP farmers. Reviewers consistently praise their detailed research, mentorship, and commitment to ecosystem integrity—though some critics argue certain slashes rely on assumptions rather than on-chain proof. A respected community leader who runs the "From Zero" trading community and shares sharp market analysis across X and Telegram, valued for honest takes on projects, tokenomics, and privacy coins like Monero and Zcash.

What people say

Received · 197 Given · 494

“Part of the sybil network / has ties to it”Details [here](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/704266/poorly-conceals-his-sybil-farm) Anyone interested in a more detailed investigation, I suggest studying the on-chain and social connections between all the accounts through reviews/vouches and invites.

on Viktor Bobur · 1140· 5mo ago · negative6

on ErnandoLyka ❤️ · 1232· 5mo ago · negative6

on 0x554C...27d1 · 1178· 5mo ago · negative6

on mentukkevin❤️$WELLTabi 🟧꧁IP꧂🫎 · 1180· 5mo ago · negative6

on Maikl Helburg · 1183· 5mo ago · negative6

“Recognized as an ALT account through consensus”This account appears as the main alt account in the [slash-round](https://app.ethos.network/activity/slash/436/abuse-of-the-ethos-system) topic directed at the user [Maran](https://app.ethos.network/profile/0x158169a722f85e8Dd64FA4692af4Ba0Ee3aC3F1F). The topic mentioned arguments such as on-chain connection, social connection on X, semantic connection, behavioral patterns on X, and shared exchange deposit addresses. During the slash-round discussion, which lasted two days, the defense presented a position according to which this user is a real person and the [brother](https://app.ethos.network/activity/slash/436?replyId=69473) of the user Maran. However, no substantial arguments were provided, and DeFiMaran himself never participated in the discussion, either with a word or with his own vote. Outside of Ethos, there is a significant connection between Maran and DeFiMaran. Inside Ethos, there is [none](https://app.ethos.network/profile/0x920f0d67aa15BBff41aa56EB4183b335911F23cc?activities=all). During the discussion, another alt account was also [mentioned](https://app.ethos.network/activity/slash/436?replyId=69427) which, based on [research](https://megalodon.jp/2026-0521-1351-01/https://x.com:443/TheMaran/status/1692579649883439170) and logic, belongs to the user Maran. Both the first and second accounts are claimed by the user Maran to be [brothers](https://app.ethos.network/activity/slash/436?replyId=69491), and neither interacts with him on Ethos. However, one of them was stated in a post to be an alt account by Maran himself, which only confirms that DeFiMaran is an alt account. Based on logic and common sense, one can conclude that Maran himself does not understand who is his brother and who is an alt account. The consensus decided to reduce Maran's credibility score, and the arguments presented in the slash-round topic were deemed convincing.

on DefiMaran⚡ · 1254· 5mo ago · negative6

“Mentioned as an ALT Account in the slash-round topic”This user was mentioned in the [slash-round](https://app.ethos.network/activity/slash/436/abuse-of-the-ethos-system) topic directed against the user [Maran](https://app.ethos.network/profile/0x158169a722f85e8Dd64FA4692af4Ba0Ee3aC3F1F). The reason was several factors, such as the publication of his referral link on X and behavioral patterns with other accounts that can be identified as a cluster controlled by one person. Other accounts also abused the system through R4R and V4V and can be viewed as fake accounts created for the purpose of multiplying potential profits, grinding, abusing the Ethos system, and creating fake reputation within the protocol.

on 無名先生 · 1232· 5mo ago · negative6

“ALT ACCOUNT”This profile is an alt account belonging to the user [Airdrop Günlüğü](https://app.ethos.network/profile/0x77F1894552a6336bd0Fb2F0e904D30858f67Cfa4). This is [confirmed](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/702532/not-a-bad-owner-of-an-alt-account) through a multifactor investigation.

on COIN BEAR · 1318· 5mo ago · negative6

“Not a bad owner of an ALT ACCOUNT”I met Ylmz not so long ago. It happened during an investigation, which revealed that he has two accounts on Ethos. He also abuses the system by using reviews to boost the credibility score of other participants, including his own accounts. His alt account, [COIN BEAR](https://app.ethos.network/profile/0x5b54a9924F8b095cEaC311972caE31F593A6Bbb4) Best airdrop farmer and detection methodology: COIN BEAR [publishes](https://megalodon.jp/2026-0511-1709-19/https://x.com:443/bycoinbear/status/1991388154390356302) his address in 2025 for a giveaway. Then [again](https://megalodon.jp/2026-0512-1404-55/https://x.com:443/bycoinbear/status/2022249526921461773) in 2026. Airdrop Günlüğü himself does the same thing, publishing COIN BEAR's EVM address and passing it off as his own. He does [this](https://megalodon.jp/2026-0512-1407-02/https://x.com:443/AirdropGunlugu/status/1464356217044799492) in 2021. Then [again](https://megalodon.jp/2026-0512-1408-33/https://x.com:443/AirdropGunlugu/status/1973495030808776827) in 2025. They share common exchange deposit addresses: Bybit: 0x9fd8fa8dabbee54798a3c753b1b96e6db38143e6 Binance: 0x4ab1c1c06e8db5ccb62db242fbb02b600ee3d498 They also have a close on-chain connection between their personal addresses. Airdrop has a connected Telegram account on Ethos. If you go to it, you'll see an account that, apparently, should be linked to [COIN BEAR](https://megalodon.jp/2026-0512-1434-43/https://t.me:443/Cryptolkm). Overall, not a bad guy, but I'll have to write negative reviews on both accounts, which will radically reduce trust in him.

on Airdrop Günlüğü 🤖ボッ · 1345· 5mo ago · negative6

on wasim (Ø,G) · 1274· 5mo ago · negative6

“Part of a sybil network”This account is part of a sybil network. A [slash-round](https://app.ethos.network/activity/slash/424/part-of-a-sybil-network-abusing-the-ethos-system) (April 12, 2026) was organized against it, and according to consensus, a decision was made to lower the profile's credibility score. This review is intended to update the data, refresh the Ethos AI summary, and also create a negative impact on its credibility score.

on Berlin · 1174· 5mo ago · negative6

“Founder of Perle Labs”His [project](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/PerleLabs) has faced serious criticism from the community and currently has a credibility score of 631 "Untrusted." This places him among the top profiles with the [lowest level](https://app.ethos.network/leaderboard?tab=least-credible) of trust. The project has 77 community reviews, 70 of which are negative. This review is intended to mark Ahmed as the founder of Perle Labs and to reflect the reputation of his project onto him. Sometimes we completely forget that behind this carnival there are real living people, not just projects. Let me share the AI summary from Ethos that is currently associated with Perle Labs' profile. "" Perle Labs (formerly Kiva AI) is widely characterized as an exploitative project that farmed users for months through gas-fee-dependent tasks, badge minting, and data labeling while promising airdrop rewards. The majority of participants, reportedly 80–90%, were marked ineligible at the checker stage without clear criteria or explanation, despite completing all requirements and paying significant SOL fees. Users report the project raised 17.5 million but distributed less than 350k in actual airdrop value (0.23% of promised 7%), extracted $30k in claiming fees, and maintained poor communication and lack of transparency throughout. A small minority of positive reviews praise the technical vision around on-chain privacy and AI infrastructure, but these are vastly outweighed by accusations of community exploitation, data theft, insider favoritism in role distribution, and deliberate bait-and-switch tactics. ""

on Ahmed Rashad · 1198· 5mo ago · negative6

‹ Back408 of 494 · most upvoted firstMore ›