ZET

196 reviews, 96% of them positive; 246 WHUF vouched for them by 7 people.96% positive · 196 reviews· 246 WHUF vouched· Influence factor 15, above 3% of accounts

The record

From 91 activities · Apr 2026

ZET is a crypto veteran and active Ethos contributor known for rigorous sybil investigations, thorough human verification, and evidence-backed reviews that prioritize ecosystem integrity over hype. Respected for mentoring others on research methodology, calling out bad actors and XP farmers, and maintaining principled, critical analysis across Web3 projects—though some dispute the evidentiary basis of certain slashes and accusations. A consistent community builder who values ethics, transparency, and honest discourse in crypto.

What people say

Received · 196 Given · 492

“Abuses the Ethos system”Uses the protocol for profit-driven purposes, participates in GTD giveaways for free NFT mints by writing positive reviews. Inflates the credibility score of a potentially dangerous NFT collection, acting on selfish personal motives. The value of this participant's reviews is questionable.

on Fobby · 1301· 4mo ago · negative219

“The poetic and cunning reviewer”I noticed cruzl for one interesting quality. He writes short poetic reviews in the context of bounties. They carry a double-edged character, and to some extent, they are pleasant to read. However, they hold no real value, nor any credible motivation. If we lived in a magical world, I could believe that with each bounty review object in the program, he has his own emotional experience that drives him to write poetic texts. But unfortunately, in reality, this is highly unlikely. During a small investigation, I found out that he has no idea who he is writing about, and this happens quite often. And that is precisely why the reviews do not contain any specific informational basis, as the protocol requires when displaying profiles for daily reviews. - He literally isn't even following those he writes about in such an emotional tone. 3 simple examples: a review addressed to [Yueya](https://megalodon.jp/2026-0629-1022-18/https://app.ethos.network:443/activity/review/710086/ruined-my-gambling-career), a review addressed to [hunter horsley](https://megalodon.jp/2026-0629-1033-14/https://app.ethos.network:443/activity/review/709738/the-calm-guy-in-a-room-full-of-degens), and a review about [Story](https://megalodon.jp/2026-0629-1023-18/https://app.ethos.network:443/activity/review/709979/my-patience-has-a-market-cap). Every day, he appears within a certain time window (about an hour), sometimes half an hour before the task update, sometimes half an hour after, and [writes](https://ibb.co/7JHbQj5Z) utter nonsense. The community has already raised the issue of his reviews, and doubts have emerged about their authenticity in terms of authorship. There are assumptions that it is simply a poetic prompt based on data from the Twitter account of the profile that ends up in the bounty task. Each review is vague, each in the style of a poetic musing, each short, and for nearly every one of them, he is not even follow. And if you put all of this together and reflect a little, it turns out that this person is simply abusing the bounty system. I wish this reviewer would express more specificity in their practical experience and opinions, as well as at least follow and study those they write about.

on cruzl.eth · 1456· 4mo ago · negative183

“If you have any other ALT accounts, mark them yourself”Why did I write this? [Look here.](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/701131/alt-account) You'd better do it before I find them myself. If, as usual, you're not guilty of anything, just write something in the comments.

on 🌱 feast 🚢 · 1249· 6mo ago · neutral216

“CONFIRMED SYBIL ACCOUNT”This sybil account is confirmed as such due to multiple factors that prove it: on-chain connections, numerous positive reviews linked to the rest of the sybil cluster, mentions in the slash round involving Zankar. Details in the slash round discussion. https://app.ethos.network/activity/slash/425/part-of-a-sybil-network-abuse-of-the-ethos-system

on It's_Nikhil · 1311· 6mo ago · negative215

“Uses an ALT ACCOUNT in Ethos”This user uses 2 accounts in Ethos and is abusing the system. They were observed during the period of daily incentivized reviews. In this case, targeting the user [voh](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/vohvohh). Their second account is [maxud.base.eth ∑](https://app.ethos.network/profile/0x6B3637d177791E09a3E26CA76D96D851EB917Fa4). Detection methodology: Neutral [review](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/702276/tarafsiz-duracam-proje-hakkinda-hic-bir-bilgim-yok) directed at Voh. Time: May 10, 2026 at 12:19 PM Neutral [review](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/702275/tarafsizim-projenin-tam-olarak-ne-oldugunu-bilmiyorum) directed at Voh from maxud.base.eth ∑. Time: May 10, 2026 at 12:17 PM Time interval between reviews: 2 minutes. Other logical connections: Both have ENS base. Both referred to the person as a "project" in their reviews. Social proof: maxud.base.eth ∑ posted on X an EVM address belonging to genesiseth.base.eth ∑, identifying it as their own profile. Post > (https://megalodon.jp/2026-0511-0928-04/https://x.com:443/maksud2278/status/1738251236208431294) [Screenshot](https://ibb.co/051NQMs) On-chain proof: Mutual transactions dating back to 2022. [Example](https://polygonscan.com/tx/0x7e4ee974edb77d5262df9bd4aaad8bfafb8009564b5dc7755846d52d05ff8c93) Shared Binance deposit address: 0x570f6e73b6758c31a9002f0d0f069ff0844fc96e Additionally: Identical pattern of behavior in incentivized reviews directed at the Abstract project. The interval between the reviews is 2 minutes, both are neutral, and both carry the same semantic meaning: [“IT'S BEEN A LONG TIME”](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/702095/uzun-zaman-oldu) [“It took a long time”](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/702094/cok-bekletti)

on genesiseth base.eth · 1271· 5mo ago · negative244

“Responsible person (founder Seedify & Spark)”This year, he broke into the vibecoding niche and proposed an interesting implementation of an AI Agent, naming it [Spark](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/Spark_coded). The core idea was to create an agent that self-improves and has multiple utilities. Months later, he has managed to build a new community around this idea, one that places its trust in him. However, the main reason for my positive review lies elsewhere. I am impressed by the quality of the agent and the approach to community management. Firstly, the development was carried out [solo](https://x.com/meta_alchemist/status/2055236831357317480). Secondly, there was a responsible approach to the distribution of Spark tokens. [Effective](https://x.com/meta_alchemist/status/2056455669386273152) anti-Sybil filtering was implemented, alongside strong communication with the community. The token was launched successfully. The participants in the events are mostly without criticism; bots have been filtered out (approximately 6k valid users out of 100k+). He has further plans and ideas for development, which he shares on his personal X. Levent Aydan shows a preference for [Base](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/base) and will likely continue developing products within this ecosystem. His first project was [Seedify](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/SeedifyFund) (the IDO meta of past years).

on Meta Alchemist · 1387· 5mo ago212

“I like what this guy is doing”Those who know me well understand how much I sometimes can't stand various project founders and teams, and how often their actions fall under my criticism. But today I can say that Serpin is one of the very few people in this category whom I rate 5 stars as a startup leader, founder, and builder. This is the case where I agree with almost everything that is being done. You can feel a competent, unhurried approach, caution, an understanding of the market, and a great desire to figure out how to properly adapt the product with maximum compliance in all key aspects. He loves his project and its idea, and this fuels him with inexhaustible energy. If there were more people like him in crypto, we could build an almost perfect Web3. What especially impresses me is the competent and cautious approach to building the economy around XP. This is rare; I don't think I've ever encountered such a tactic and attention to this issue before. A special project, and I'm glad to be a part of it.

on Serpin Taxt · 2000· 8mo ago81

“Sybil with bot-like behavior”Recognized Sybil account, AI slop, Bounty review grinder. Low-quality web3 member.

on PayuP 🫎 · 1036· 5mo ago · negative209

“Very strange”The Twitter handler links this account to none other than Jimmy Edgar. Links come from both Wikipedia and his official website. Jimmy himself presents himself as an American electronic musician, producer, conceptual artist, and designer from Detroit. He has social accounts with the same handler as on X. BUT on Ethos he is either presented as a scammer or as a scam project. Judging by his feed, I don't see anything creative. However, at the moment he is running a fundraising campaign amid a future NFT collection. I haven't really looked into it in depth, but one could think that Jimmy changed his handler, and a scammer took his place. However, old posts confirm the authenticity of the account. For example, 2012, a post about touring https://x.com/JIMMYEDGAR/status/174540246048964608 And the thing is, Jimmy really was there. The tweet from February 28, 2012 came out on the same day the festival officially announced the full lineup. It matches completely. THAT IS, if this is a scammer, then you know where to find him. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Edgar

on jimmy · 1156· 23d ago · neutral80

“A decent person with good intentions in crypto”I've known SPH for about a year now through our shared participation in Ethos. This guy shares the vision of ethics through his actions, trying to shield others from losing money against the backdrop of the constantly emerging forms of fraud in this space. Over the year, I also couldn't help but notice his active involvement in the development of Ethos. My review is intended to give this guy's profile a bit more credibility than it currently has. He definitely deserves it.

on SPH · 1427· 13d ago77

“Team member of Ethos”I've probably known Node for almost a year now, and during that time I've come to recognize him as a truly valuable member of Ethos, both as a teammate and as a contributor who brings real benefit. He's constantly on the Discord server, frequently online, always happy to join a conversation, answer questions, and generally discuss anything related to bug reports or feedback. On top of that, he's also developing his own anti-sybil detection utility, essentially spending his time for the good of Ethos, to help those who care about the protocol's future. A solid, respectable guy.

on node · 1913· 4mo ago356

“An Old Friend, from 2019 to Today”I have known Gedis for 6 years. We once pondered together what the value of Ethereum was and whether it had a future, back when the price was around $100-200 per ETH. We all remember 2018 and the crypto downtrend, with new lows and depression, and the endless flat period that followed made many question if crypto had any future. We believed that Ethereum was the only chance to make the entire crypto sector larger and more functional, but we didn't know how things would actually turn out. Today, having gone through the market's sweat and tears, we see how it all unfolded. And Gedis, starting from the basic functionality of the growing EVM, discovered the GameFi niche, acquiring deep knowledge and an enthusiasm that now helps others, including me.

on Gedis · 1714· 1y ago · neutral66

‹ Back48 of 492 · most upvoted firstMore ›