ZET

197 reviews, 96% of them positive; 247 WHUF vouched for them by 8 people.96% positive · 197 reviews· 247 WHUF vouched· Influence factor 15, above 3% of accounts

The record

From 91 activities · Apr 2026

ZET is a crypto veteran and active Ethos contributor known for rigorous sybil investigations, thorough human verification, and evidence-backed reviews that expose bad actors and XP farmers. Reviewers consistently praise their detailed research, mentorship, and commitment to ecosystem integrity—though some critics argue certain slashes rely on assumptions rather than on-chain proof. A respected community leader who runs the "From Zero" trading community and shares sharp market analysis across X and Telegram, valued for honest takes on projects, tokenomics, and privacy coins like Monero and Zcash.

What people say

Received · 197 Given · 494

“Suggestion for Improvement”This digital elder should lower its sensitivity threshold. And refine the technology for substantiating its claims (especially when it issues reviews with a negative flag), as this can inherently create a negative user experience and a feeling of unfair accusation. The motivation for my suggestion is the post [https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/578314/ai-generated-review-detected-1st-offense], where a user is accused of using AI, yet there is nothing that directly points to this or provides supporting arguments. Yes, people use AI as a translator, but it is worth considering that people can also use AI as a grammar corrector in their native language, which can also create a "polished" text effect. Suspicious glances for articulate speech and well-developed thought in dialogue are something I personally encounter. By the way, this begins to reflect a modern problem where the quality of textual content is perceived as the creation of artificial intelligence. In the future, it will be difficult for us to interact with each other and trust one another if we are not poorly educated degenerates or if we don't try to emulate them. [https://x.com/0xKharon/status/1912608122482401746]

on eleosagent.eth · 1318· 11mo ago · neutral23

“A person with prospects”I first noticed her probably in the Solana ecosystem as a KOL on CT, posting regular content on various topics. But it's hard not to mention the fact of positive development when a person goes from being an ordinary enthusiast to the stage of direct partnership with projects and working on a team. For me, this is at least an indicator of ambition. I don't remember ever seeing her involved in any serious negative incidents or dramas (I don't deny that they could have happened).

on voh · 1740· 5mo ago · neutral15

“A high-quality crypto tracker”Throughout its entire existence, I have had no issues using CoinGecko. Technically speaking, its interface is logical and intuitively understandable. The platform is more open than CoinMarketCap; however, this accessibility allows many malicious actors to list their pump-and-dump tokens, inflating trading volumes and manipulating them to attract attention.

on CoinGecko · 1851· 9mo ago · neutral15

“Herald from TON”For me, Kudrya is a person who is fully immersed in the TON ecosystem. In our community, he is one of the few who can provide consultation on all matters related to this ecosystem, whether it’s DeFi protocols, events, or nuances. Additionally, he is an active participant and supports many. I'm glad we met and are part of the same team.

on ʀᴇᴀʟ ᴋᴜᴅʀʏᴀ · 1278· 12mo ago14

“A exchange of old memories”Once upon a time, this was one of my favorite exchanges. I was there before programs like Starter were introduced, before they had their own token, GT, in which I also participated in the token sale. This exchange captivated me with its retro interface and the variety of tokens available for trading. Much has changed for the worse for users. I don’t see the quality that was there before, and among competitors, it remains in the shadows. There are reasons to raise a neutral flag for the review, as many things that have happened in the last couple of years raise suspicions among attentive traders.

on Gate · 1469· 1y ago · neutral14

“Experience Equals Success”Roman is a highly experienced Telegram community admin and moderator for partner projects that's how I've always known him. However, he recently embarked on a new direction: content creation on X, where he highlights important industry events. It's only a matter of time before his account gains significant traction. He has achieved excellent results on Telegram before and will undoubtedly replicate that success on Twitter. Today, Roman shares structured insights that I follow closely. His opinion carries weight with me, as he has repeatedly helped me see situations from a different perspective thanks to his unique point of view.

on CryptoRom · 1280· 1y ago14

“VC Worthy of Recognition”When I considered writing a review about this VC on Ethos, I initially thought it would be empty, but it turns out I’m not the only one interested, as others have already shared their thoughts. I’m not sure if anyone has mentioned this, but for me, this is perhaps the only venture fund that recognized the potential of BTC a year before I did. I will include a message to investors from the CEO of Pantera here: From: Dan Morehead Sent: July 5, 2013 Subject: VERY TIMELY: We Should Buy Bitcoin NOW @ $65 The forecast bitcoin washout happened - very quickly. Bitcoins are now trading at $65 / BTC-exactly half the price they were trading at our first meeting on May 28th. I think we should buy aggressively now. Brief thoughts: The market cap of all bitcoins ever created (and probably 10-25% have been lost or destroyed) is now $740 million. On May 28th, $20mm would buy 156,000 bitcoins. Now it will buy 308,000. ...the price is going WAY UP. It's going to squeeze up like a watermelon seed. I'm going to buy 30,000 bitcoins this weekend with personal money. The Fund can have this purchase or not, as others wish. I just want to get involved. Dan DAN MOREHEAD CEO PANTERA My post: https://x.com/0xKharon/status/1910567279995036080

on Pantera Capital · 1717· 1y ago16

“Fixed a bug in Orchard”Not long ago, a professional contract researcher at Shielded Labs, using AI, found a bug in the Orchard update. The update was activated back in 2022, which means the bug had existed for four whole years without anyone knowing about it. The essence is that this vulnerability allowed an unlimited amount of ZEC to be minted in shielded pools. These mints passed validation and were considered valid. Even though the critical vulnerability was fixed in a timely manner, it damaged trust in ZCash, and the market reacted with a major correction. The very structure of Orchard cannot be 100% audited due to its privacy focused design. This creates additional doubts and concerns that a critical vulnerability of this kind may not be the last or the only one that potentially exists. It also provides no 100% guarantee that no one had exploited this vulnerability earlier. In theory, anyone who knew about this exploit could mint an unlimited amount of ZEC and sell it into the market, or accumulate it for a future dump. However, the Turnstile mechanism, which acts as a counter between shielded and transparent emissions, did not detect any discrepancy in the total supply. This might indicate that no one had exploited the vulnerability for their own benefit before now. Shielded Labs proposed implementing the Ironwood update, which is intended to seal the old Orchard pool and create a new one with a new mathematical supply verification mechanism to detect any inconsistencies. This will allow everyone to see for themselves that everything is in order. I am not a supporter of Zcash and never have been. Lately, there has been a lot of noise around this project, in my opinion undeservedly so. For many years, it stagnated and was unusable for the average consumer (today, almost nothing has changed). Many well known figures who have never cared about privacy (and in some cases, their activities are the complete opposite of it) have decided to mention ZEC, but for some reason not XMR. If you need privacy, just buy and use Monero. If you need optional privacy, just use or don't use Monero. If you need exchange trading, futures, and constant big bag gambling, buy ZEC. Either way, in my opinion more than half of its holders do not use it for its intended purpose.

on Zcash 🛡️ · 1520· 5mo ago · neutral15

“You can't trust this person, not a single word he says”I've known Justin for a very long time, and the only lasting impression I have of him is that you can't trust a single word he says.

on H.E. Justin Sun 👨‍🚀 🌞 · 1198· 9mo ago · negative15

“A dedicated trader with a sharp focus on the Solana blockchain”Koala is a valued member of our private trading community. He specializes primarily in Solana DEX. His strategy involves monitoring emerging meme tokens while also maintaining positions in established ones. He effectively utilizes sniper bots and has a track record of successful trades. Overall, he's an exceptionally active community member. Truly relentless with no days off. It's almost a daily occurrence to see a new buy signal from him, followed by closing a profitable trade with a 2x+ return a few hours later. I'm very glad to know him and believe he's a significant asset to any trading focused group.

on lazykoala · 1359· 1y ago15

“Tier 3-4 CEX”A rather unremarkable tier 3-4 exchange suffering from a liquidity deficit. Comparable to Bitmart, LATOKEN, and the like. This is my subjective opinion. Despite its shortcomings, it has been around for quite some time and occasionally attracts interest through the listing of certain tokens. Its affordable listing fees prevent it from falling into complete obscurity.

on LBank.com · 1243· 9mo ago · neutral13

“DEX on the FOGO chain (Score manipulation)”Lately, I've seen a wave of positive reviews, all pretty typical in nature. Everywhere you look, it's the same template: "fast dex". This is linked to a post on X: https://x.com/0xlas_/status/2024253729596166375, which is offering to leave a review on the Ethos profile: "i just reviewed @ValiantTrade on @ethos_network if you are o @fogo flame season , you would agree with everything i said about valiant, this is the time to give your own review via this link" The post was reposted by the official Valiant account. I can't consider the latest wave of reviews to be genuine, especially in the context of the pushy offer to leave a review and agree with everything IF people are in the "flame season". My negative review is intended to offset a potentially inflated score. I hope their Ethos profile doesn't get slashed after a while. Addition on the topic of incentivized reviews. A note from another Ethos user: " “They are involved in review manipulation, requesting reviews for 1000 xp each” saw some reviews on their profile. later tried to dig in and found out mini announcement in their discord where team is giving away 1000 xp for each review. also that's been widely discussed within their discord. soliciting reviews for xp even if without asking for positive reviews is against spirit of Ethos. reason being no one leaves negative review in general when they are getting benefit in return. " Link: [https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/683689/they-are-involved-in-review-manipulation-requesting-reviews-for-1000-xp-each]

on Valiant · 1242· 8mo ago · negative13

‹ Back480 of 494 · most upvoted firstMore ›