MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓351aadvark↓292Majdi↓264Tradeclioagent.eth↑63.1%jesse.base.eth↑30.2%Sk0rp.eth↑15.3%BlindSquirrel↑7.8%VouchesCorey0001 📉 📈10 WHUF → ChescoSamZ5 WHUF → SafZ🫎 Scaply .ink .sand3 WHUF → AndrewDAndrewD2 WHUF → 🫎 Scaply .ink .sandReviews₿IRBnegative · 48 upvotes一川drive 🔴positive · 43 upvotesvaggelis.vavaroutsos.base.ethpositive · 35 upvotes🫎 Scaply .ink .sandpositive · 22 upvotes
Profile· Known@0xKharonOn Ethos
ZET

ZET

197 reviews, 96% of them positive; 247 WHUF vouched for them by 8 people.96% positive · 197 reviews· 247 WHUF vouched· Influence factor 15, above 3% of accounts

The record

From 91 activities · Apr 2026

ZET is a crypto veteran and active Ethos contributor known for rigorous sybil investigations, thorough human verification, and evidence-backed reviews that expose bad actors and XP farmers. Reviewers consistently praise their detailed research, mentorship, and commitment to ecosystem integrity—though some critics argue certain slashes rely on assumptions rather than on-chain proof. A respected community leader who runs the "From Zero" trading community and shares sharp market analysis across X and Telegram, valued for honest takes on projects, tokenomics, and privacy coins like Monero and Zcash.

“There are well-founded concerns that this is a fictitious VC”One of the members of the Ethos community raised the question regarding the legitimacy of this entity as an investment fund. The discussion was brought up in the investigations channel on the Discord server. I agree with these arguments and share the opinion that the fund was created fictitiously. The entire discussion is available at the [link](https://discord.com/channels/1230729763170287647/1354239562364223609/1556302581897105438). The main concern, copied from the chat: "" SPH: (https://x.com/kiedexapp) claims a $3.5 million seed funding round led by (https://x.com/MarqelCapital) meanwhile, (https://x.com/uormapp) has also listed the same name in a $7.5 million funding announcement on its X account. Total announced: $3.5 million + $7.5 million = $11 million. All of this comes from a firm with absolutely no tangible track record. The marqelcapital.xyz website is merely a single-page template. There is no information regarding the team, partners, portfolio, or office location only an email address: info@marqelcapital.xyz. Its social media account was created in 2020, yet there were no posts regarding investments prior to 2026. PitchBook data cites Singapore and their profile mentions Italy, yet the initial registration location was actually Bangladesh. There are no SEC filings or evidence of a licensed investment manager. DeFiLlama and CryptoRank list KieDex simply because they reposted the tweets; however, a tweet is not proof of a wire transfer. The KieDex account was created in January 2026, the website lacks founder information, KYC verification was only enabled right before the TGE (token launch), and "audit-ready" status is not the same as an actual audit. The same investor is claimed by two anonymous projects and a VC page that uses a generic website template. Simply following a project from a VC account does not equate to a $7.5 million investment. Anyone can create an investment fund page and claim whatever fundraising figures they wish. What do you think? open to criticism or discussion, I am very curious about this. and it would also help advance my independent research. ""on Marqel Capital · 1182· 15d ago · negative14
‹ Back492 of 494 · most upvoted firstMore ›