ZET

196 reviews, 96% of them positive; 246 WHUF vouched for them by 7 people.96% positive · 196 reviews· 246 WHUF vouched· Influence factor 15, above 3% of accounts

The record

From 91 activities · Apr 2026

ZET is a crypto veteran and active Ethos contributor known for rigorous sybil investigations, thorough human verification, and evidence-backed reviews that prioritize ecosystem integrity over hype. Respected for mentoring others on research methodology, calling out bad actors and XP farmers, and maintaining principled, critical analysis across Web3 projects—though some dispute the evidentiary basis of certain slashes and accusations. A consistent community builder who values ethics, transparency, and honest discourse in crypto.

What people say

Received · 196 Given · 492

on zankar.eth · 1329· 6mo ago · negative99

on MK · 1234· 5mo ago · negative163

“Official account of the development team”This account is part of the Uniswap ecosystem and is listed in the official [document](https://support.uniswap.org/hc/en-us/articles/17522892515341-Official-Uniswap-Labs-links). Some in CT may quote it. It posts various announcements and retweets partners.

on Uniswap Developers · 984· 5mo ago292

“The project collaborates with scam KOLs, be cautious”I am leaving a negative review to draw greater attention and urge caution regarding this project, as I noticed that these individuals collaborate with KOLs known for their fraudulent schemes involving memecoins on Solana. One of the KOLs is a member of the Ardizor group. His post about the project: [https://x.com/nobrainflip/status/2017182605649576086] Proof of close collaboration (the first reposts from the project team): https://ibb.co/RTMXRwcQ My review of him: [https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/662106/active-scam-kol-from-solana] Who Ardizor is: [https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/ardizor]

on Tria · 559· 9mo ago · negative53

“Private messenger”Session is a decentralized private messenger that has been around for quite a while. It received support from Vitalik Buterin and boasts its own user base. The economy is tied to a token, and nodes exist to maintain decentralization. However, recently the project has faced a lack of funding, which caused a mixed reaction from the community. Session is not the only one of its kind, but it remains relevant. The messenger also has its own token, $SESH.

on Session · 1284· 6mo ago270

“It has to do with XMR20 (a fake token standard)”This profile on X has some social influence and, apparently, a controversial reputation. I noticed how one of the commenters hinted that XMR20 is [another scam](https://x.com/Waronbuffet_/status/2105558520372596926), which means that precedents of fraud committed in his name have probably already occurred. Most likely, he is the founder. By the way, I also noticed that some of his posts and posts made on behalf of the project are boosted with the help of a KOL named Kook. A brief overview of what [XMR20](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/719261) is and who [Kook](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/KookCapitalLLC) is. Lately he's been baiting the audience by subtly creating an image for the project that the official Monero account might soon tweet about them. - That will never happen. Posts use targeted like-boosting where necessary, for example in controversial discussions or promotion. Nobody knows who these people are. They have nothing to do with the ecosystem. The entire mechanics of their idea for extracting profit consists of having an XMR20 token on the Solana chain, while the posts and the intrigue fuel the interest of speculators. At the moment, this is probably their only source of income.

on Cryptopeet · 1193· 16d ago · negative66

“Too often hated for the drain”Over the years, TrustWallet has probably become top 1 in my X feed for complaints from people about crypto being withdrawn from their addresses. I don't know what it's related to, but there really are a lot of such cases. I don't use this wallet and I don't have fresh experience working with it. But I think it would be useful if my personal observations are reflected in their profile on Ethos. Another fresh example I came across in my feed: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/717707 Technically, there could be a bad actor on the team, or someone at the intermediary level in the infrastructure. We'll never know for sure. But it's important to understand that the team knows about this frequent problem, but no one will publicly admit it to avoid damaging their reputation, which should be built on trust. After all, we're dealing with people's money and trust, and theft is hard to prove.

on Trust Wallet · 1234· 38d ago · negative65

“Sybil Operator (Not the Main One)”This user operates at least 3 accounts on Ethos. Every day, within a specific time window, at fixed intervals, and in a sequence that remains unchanged from day to day, reviews are posted from these accounts. The activity log directly indicates that all these accounts are managed by a single individual. https://app.ethos.network/profile/0x1E83Da0885d0E400f3e9dEB95B43eCeC01D79830 https://app.ethos.network/profile/0x46c095E71056a2Aa8c5b29c3d568bF2bC8a3ec13 The connections are also traceable through on-chain data and the protocol itself. "slashing over alts is meh. even @serpinxbt has ethos agent as an alt, will you slash him too?"

on wolf 👾 · 1302· 2mo ago · negative90

“Suspicious behavior of the project founder / Banning all of Nigeria”I consider this act incompetent and unethical. According to his own [announcement](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/701706/we-have-removed-kled-from-the-nigerian-app-store-and-ip-banned-the-entire~), he blocked the entire country of Nigeria in his application by IP and other methods. [Kled](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/218477/average-ai-tech-massively-shileld) is likely encouraging users for the data they upload, including their own personal documents. Such radical actions may be taken in order to avoid paying out rewards for media files and personal data. Apparently, Nigeria was one of the main contributors to this project. Avi already has a number of negative reviews related to his project, so the context of the review is suspicious and negative. Instead of developing anti-fraud mechanisms and winning over the community, he denies them access to their own data and presumably to payouts for contributions, without bothering to determine where the fraud is and where real documents and media files are. That's his problem and his responsibility.

on Avi Patel · 923· 6mo ago · negative297

“Co-CEO of Cosmos Labs”Barry went through the same path as [Maghnus](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/0xMagmar) (the second co-CEO). Both were co-founders of Skip, which was acquired by the Interchain Foundation (and rebranded as Interchain Inc.). He has a technical focus, while Maghnus is the communicator. Under his leadership, the team developed IBC Eureka (also known as IBC v2), which has become well-known across the Cosmos ecosystem today. Essentially, Eureka was conceived as a convenient and inexpensive inter-chain bridge. The goal was to remove boundaries and turn the Cosmos Hub into a central liquidity hub for assets from EVM, SVM, and other ecosystems. However, as far as I know, it hasn’t gained significant popularity today, and Cosmos continues to suffer from a lack of liquidity. As I already mentioned in [my review](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/701722/co-ceo-of-cosmos-labs) of Maghnus, many projects have either migrated to other ecosystems or shut down entirely.The technology itself is excellent, but it hasn’t won over the market at this moment.

on barry · 1292· 5mo ago · neutral171

“Review and Vouch speculation by creating tasks on their own platform”This project is inflating its Score by motivating Ethos users to leave EXCLUSIVELY positive reviews about them, as well as vouch for them by staking ETH. Even though this is a brand new project that has partnered with Ethos Network and gives priority to users with reputation, ETHICS MUST BE THE HIGHEST PRIORITY. I will be downvoting every incoming review on this project and I've already done so for the positive reviews that came in on this profile over the last 24 hours. I can't trust user reviews on this profile's page while this Score-boosting campaign is going on, and I see them as biased. Link to my post with a [screenshot](https://x.com/0xKharon/status/2031455415649841192). I told them about it, and here's the response I got: " This was a decision that was discussed directly with the Ethos team. We're not forcing anybody to do it. " Archive: https://ghostarchive.org/archive/A5rug

on Vibestarter · 1570· 7mo ago · negative84

“Flagship V4 HOOK”Unipeg is one of the first and most notable (as of now) experimental projects on Uniswap V4 hooks (launched April, 2026). It combines a liquid ERC20 token with fully on-chain collectible objects (pixel art unicorns). Essentially, it is the flagship of the "Summer Hook" category. Binance recently added this category to its wallet, thereby recognizing its relevance and community support. The protocol carries a unique logic that is closely tied to trading and the V4 pool. For credibility and future readers: A post from the CMO of OpenSea in the [replies](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/704067/unipegv-4-opensea-uniswap-nice-look-forward-to-trying-out-the-wrapper-later~) to this project. A [reply](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/704068/unipegv-4-uniswap-someone-pill-me-on-this-i-saw-hooks-and-unicorns-and-got~) from a Uniswap team member. It's simply quite well-known in certain circles. I'll add [nairolf's](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/0xNairolf) thread below: bro wat is unipeg? An explanation of [@unipegv4](https://x.com/unipegv4) and Uniswap Hooks, in (very) simple terms. "whats that?" Unipeg uses a custom Uniswap v4 hook to render a unique collectible image entirely on-chain. Each image is tied to a specific integer amount of uPEG - 1, 2, 3 and so on. When a swap occurs, the hook generates a hash encoding layers, colors and the original owner. "huuuh??" Let’s start with what a Uniswap v4 hook is. Before Uniswap v4, a swap was just a swap. You trade token A for token B. Done. With v4, you can plug custom logic inside the swap. That logic runs automatically every time someone trades. "custom logic??" Imagine a coffee machine. Before: insert coin, get coffee. With hooks: insert coin, get coffee and something else happens. Something else = anything like a receipt gets printed, a counter goes up, an image gets created. Whatever the dev decided. "simpler" Hooks = code that runs when people trade Instead of just swapping tokens, you can: - generate data - create things - basically anything Swaps become triggers for anything. "ok and this unipeg thing?" Unipeg's hook does this: every time someone ends up holding one full token, the hook generates a unique number. That number = instructions/recipe for an image. It says: use these colors, these shapes, this layout. "and then?" An onchain renderer reads that recipe and builds a pixel unicorn from it. So, the token you bought is now linked to an onchain image. "so i own an nft?" Not exactly. You own a fungible token. The unicorn is just permanently attached to it. 1 uPEG = 1 unicorn. Transfer the token, your unicorn is gone. "what if i buy 0.4?" No unicorn. The hook only triggers on whole tokens. 0.4 uPEG = just a token fragment, no image attached. 1 uPEG = a token with a unique pixel unicorn baked in. "tldr?" Unipeg uses a Uniswap v4 hook to generate a unique pixel unicorn every time someone buys a full token. Buy fungible token, unique art is generated, trade it either as an ERC20 or an NFT. Original [thread](https://x.com/0xNairolf/status/2051294655367508048). ! It is important to understand that the token has a speculative nature. There are risks of financial losses based on market sentiment.

on Unipeg · 1205· 5mo ago190

‹ Back72 of 492 · most upvoted firstMore ›