Profile· Neutral@2024MacBookPro On Ethos

MacBook Pro

2 reviews, 100% of them positive.100% positive · 2 reviews· Influence factor 1, above 0% of accounts

The record

From 2 activities · Jul 2026

MacBook is direct and honest with project feedback, calling out mistakes without hesitation while recognizing strong execution. Known for smooth onboarding and clear, kind communication—helping make the web3 community more welcoming and accessible.

What people say

Received · 2 Given · 39

“Stay away from this Indian project”They provide an NFT that requires 0.03ETH/0.1ETH to build a rat warehouse before TGE, and provide a large number of free mint NFTs to the internal address, they are shameful, completely forgetting about testnet users, they just want to make all users' money in rug money

on Fraction AI · 1309· 12mo ago · negative4

“Scam team”Stay away from their projects

on Camp Network · 321· 10mo ago · negative4

“Billions blatantly violated the terms of the ICO and manipulated the token”Community public sale: 1⃣ On August 5, 2025, it landed on kaito, which was in full swing at the time, with a valuation of $200 million and 75% unlocked at TGE; 2⃣ On August 9, 2025, the updated terms are: valuation of $100 million, 100% unlocked at TGE; 3⃣ On August 15, 2025, due to overselling, Billions chose to increase from 5M to 5.68M to eat up all payments; 4⃣ On April 27, 2026, the Billions team forcibly amended the unlocking terms, offering three options: 100% refund or lock-up for 6 months or lock-up for 12 months, citing that the 5.68% first-day unlock posed significant obstacles to listing on the exchange. 5⃣ , on May 2, 2026, it was announced that participants who opted for a refund could receive a 5% stablecoin bonus and a 100% refund; 🔴 You can see the whole process, Billions is extremely unprofessional, constantly revising the terms, to say that the grassroots team is not excessive!

on Billions Network · 684· 6mo ago · negative1

“A very large project”Sahara AI is an innovative platform that has garnered attention for its ambitious approach to decentralized artificial intelligence. By leveraging blockchain technology, Sahara AI aims to create a secure, transparent, and accessible ecosystem for AI development and deployment. Its core strength lies in its commitment to democratizing AI, allowing users to contribute to and benefit from a shared network of computational resources and data. This decentralized model addresses critical concerns like data privacy and centralized control, offering a promising alternative to traditional AI frameworks. The platform’s user-centric design and emphasis on scalability make it appealing to developers and businesses alike. Its ability to facilitate collaborative AI model training while ensuring data sovereignty is particularly noteworthy. Additionally, Sahara AI’s integration of smart contracts enhances trust and efficiency in transactions, fostering a robust environment for innovation. The platform’s native token incentivizes participation, creating a self-sustaining economy that rewards contributors. However, Sahara AI is not without challenges. The complexity of its blockchain-based infrastructure may pose a learning curve for new users, and its success hinges on widespread adoption. Scalability issues common in blockchain networks could also impact performance as the platform grows. Furthermore, while the vision of decentralized AI is compelling, competition in this space is fierce, with established players already dominating the market.

on Sahara AI 🔆 · 1543· 1y ago1

“He is an untrustworthy person”He told people that he would give away codes, but he wouldn't keep his promises, he took advantage of the trust of his fans

on tobi · 1485· 1y ago · negative1

“Betrayal of the community, betrayal of investors, and profits for insiders.”1. The CEO explicitly stated that the coin will not be launched on Binance or Upbit, and there will be no business dealings with Binance whatsoever. 2. The CEO stated that 8.4 million USDC was held publicly, with 85% (approximately $7.14 million) held by the Treasury. However, the majority of this amount has actually been transferred to Coinbase. 🔺The redemption process requires manual verification of identity and completion of anti-money laundering checks, followed by a refund within 30 days via the original payment method. Offline verification can be problematic, and the question arises: why are 85% of the initial deposit being refunded? This is primarily intended to highlight the inconsistency in the process. 3. The pool contained $100,000 USDC and $20,000 WHUF, and the CEO has repeatedly stated that the primary liquidity is on CEX platforms. However, the CEO is reportedly dissatisfied with Coinbase, as CEX platforms haven't shown significant improvements. 4. The price of $4.2 and the repurchase price of $3.57 have already fallen, and there are 20% of shares held by investors waiting for a rebound. I don't believe they will be able to easily exit with a profitable sale. 5. Of course, the most important thing is the project itself. There is a demand for on-chain verifiable identity, but I am confident that Ethos will not be the solution for this particular market. Currently, it lacks real-world applications and actual revenue. It is rumored that the company will shift its focus to predictive markets in the future. Finally, this project is no longer worth our attention. Remember to withdraw the ETH held in the markets ($1600 worth of ETH 😂), and then uninstall the extension. That's it!

on Ethos · 2218· 7d ago · negative0

“A shadowy group purchased the project with the intention of issuing tokens.”1. The number of views on the tweets is artificially inflated. Before March, the tweets had between 100-500 views. Starting in March, the views increased to 10,000, and then to 50,000. Long-form posts reached 100,000 views. However, the actual views were significantly lower, ranging from 500-1000, and followed a clear pattern. Examining this pattern will reveal the truth. 🔺 It seems like DAPPOS ($DOS) is also a top-tier VC that is transitioning to AI and then going through a token generation event (TGE). Interestingly, their timeline also began in March. Is March a significant month for these types of transitions? 2. The entire project lacks any publicly available information regarding its tokenomics, airdrops, or even its initial token generation event (TGE). This is particularly surprising given the apparent sophistication of the Binance Alpha launch. 3. The community is extremely inactive. The project, which has been running for 6 years, has 4,000+ members on Discord and 600+ on Telegram. Due to this lack of activity, there has been no recent updates. 4. Founded in 2020, with its peak activity period being 2020-2022, but its active period for TVL was 2024-2025. Is there a discrepancy in the data, or is it possible that the figures are manipulated? It seems they were likely looking for an opportunity to conduct a TGE (Token Generation Event) during this period. 5. The $5 million from the pool was accumulated through multiple withdrawals and transfers from Bitget and Binance. There is even suspicion that $DEBIT intentionally created these transactions. 6. Total: 1 billion, circulating at 17.22%, including: Binance Alpha 1%, allegedly belonging to Binance at 1.75% + 0.75%, plus the address of the pool at 1.25%, with an additional 1.11% added to the pool, and 0.13% in the Bitget Hot Wallet. The remaining amounts are distributed across multiple multi-signature wallets. The estimated 1% held by Binance Alpha is clear and should be well-controlled, as evidenced by the 97% holding of $DGAI from 0.1 to 0.7 in the previous two days. 7. 18:00: Binance Alpha goes live. 20:00: CEXs go live, including Bitget and KuCoin. No pre-sale, no predictions – just relying on skill and execution. 8⃣, Teller was initially a decentralized lending platform combining traditional loans and on-chain borrowing. However, the sudden announcement of an AI-driven financial platform – which, incidentally, doesn't involve an AI agent that posted nearly 32.1k identical tweets on X 😂 – has caused quite a stir. 🔺 Very old financing: $7.85M, TVL: $1.21M, peak: $17.16M, active loans: $167k, peak: $4.66M, website data shows over $80M in loans processed. 🔺 Previously offered "buy now, pay later" options for blue-chip NFTs, and have actually provided unsecured crypto mortgages. In 2022, we provided a $500,000 loan to a user in Texas to purchase a $680,000 property without collateral. 🔺Jane Lippencott, a former advisor to Teller and now a partner at a16z, has a strong connection to the company. a16z has a solid foundation and is backed by numerous well-known projects and institutions. 🔺Founder Ryan Berkun invested a total of $37.3 million, but his investment has seemingly vanished without a trace, which is highly unusual. 🟢 Overall, the narrative is unremarkable, the angle is unusual, the outlook is generally poor, the background is excellent, the fund was backed by a top VC, but the hype is low, with low TVL and unknown revenue, and likely a very high degree of control. 🔺The fundamentals are quite weak. It appears to be a VC-backed project, repackaged as an AI-driven token, and its initial listing on Binance Alpha is likely to trigger a significant price movement. The information available is extremely limited, making it difficult to analyze. However, there are clear signs of manipulation, and it's crucial to be aware of the risks involved.

on Teller · 1299· 50d ago · negative0

“They invested a lot in advertising and marketing efforts.”$KII (KiiChain) will be listed on Binance Alpha at 21:00 on August 14, 2026. 🟢 Simplified version: This project has no real highlights. The drop rate is too high, and there are many inactive items with low popularity! 🟠 Token Name: $KII 🔴Token contract: 0xeec6574eabba52bac3f0277f2cd5ac7e67197886 🔵 Pool price: 0.0583 [Key Information]: Total amount: 1.8 billion. Circulation rate: 17.455%. breakdown: 2.1% for air drops, 0.275% for public sales, 5% for ecological purposes, and 10.08% for community incentives. The specific distribution rates are as follows: Binance Alpha at 1%, public sales at 0.275%, and giveaways at 2.1%. The timing of the community giveaways is unknown. ➡️FDV 105M, locked up in December, cost 0.0583, representing 0.29% of the total value. ➡️FDV: 140 million. 30% unlocked. Cost: 0.0778. Represents 0.25% of the total value. ➡️FDV: 175 million. Unlocked 100%. Cost: 0.0972. Represents 0.20% of the total value. In this public listing, there are a total of 131 addresses available for selection. Out of these, 108 addresses have chosen to use FDV as their trading method. Among these 108 addresses, 75 have bid prices below $500, while 14 of them have bid volumes exceeding 50,000 units (either by teams, whales, or market makers). This accounts for 92.3% of the total number of addresses. Additionally, among the 9 addresses with bid volumes exceeding 100,000 units, all of them share the same source of funding. At 21:00, the coin asset will be listed on Binance’s Alpha platform. At the same time, assets from various CEX platforms will also be listed, including Bybit, Kucoin, Kraken, Bitget, and Mexc. KiiChain is a modular L1 platform, designed for handling foreign exchange transactions. It features a blockchain-based foreign exchange processing layer, enabling round-the-clock foreign exchange transactions, cross-border payments, and programmable settlement functions. Financed with 26 million dollars. The credibility of this information is somewhat questionable. The information comes mainly from the project’s blog and Defillama. There is no authoritative data to verify this claim. Nimbus Capital promised to invest 20 million dollars, but the actual amount and details remain unknown. 🟢Overall, the narrative is average, the background is also average. The number of tokens in circulation is high, but the popularity is low. The credibility of the financing methods is questionable, and the actual revenue is unknown. The control over the tokens is average, but it’s high. There are many activities on many CEXs, so it seems that they have provided quite a lot of tokens. The potential pressure from token distributions is quite high. Additionally, there are no significant transactions on the main network of kiichain. It’s necessary to keep a close eye on cross-chain transactions.

on KiiChain · 1206· 2mo ago · negative0

“I definitely will not buy their tokens”June 24, 2026, 20:00 (UTC+8) Launching Binance Alpha's $NES (Nesa) : 🟢Skip version: I definitely won't buy this one, so I'll just mess around!! 🟠Token name: $NES 🔴Token contract: 0x3131f6b80c26936ab03f7d9d29eb4ddf36ac3fb5 🔵Pond Price: 0.11 🟡Pond Composition: 0.055-0.109: 350k USDT 0.033-0.109: 150k USDT 0.11-0.44: 3.18M $NES 0.11-0.77: 1.36M $NES 【Key Information】: 1⃣，Initial total 1 billion, expanding 8% annually until decreasing to 1.8% annually to remain fixed, circulation 14.15%, details unknown, suspected no airdrop, high control; 2⃣, Nesa has its own public chain, but 94.88% of $NES has bridged onto the BSC chain, abandoning its native public chain 😂. Estimated distribution: Binance Alpha 1% + Binance Booster 0.1% + OKX 0.143% + Liquidity 0.46%, the rest unknown; 3⃣, Binance Alpha is at 20 points, and CEXs including Kucoin, OKX, Kraken, etc. are also expected to be at 20 points; 4⃣, Mexc price is 0.39 but the volume is only 1435 USD, not relevant, and no Polymarket FDV prediction; 5⃣, this time there's no bundling, all sniper attacks, + unpopular projects + bearish sentiment,预计 sniper 300,000 USD, price rises to 0.2 nearby; 6⃣, Nesa's narrative is a lightweight Layer1 platform for AI models and inference that provides privacy protection + decentralized verification, although it leverages some AI and privacy narratives, the implementation is a huge challenge; 🔺 Additionally, Nesa's co-founder Patrick Colangelo is also a co-founder of $LYN, and Nesa has invested in $LYN, so it's indeed "choosing talents without avoiding relatives"; 🔺 $LYN raised $15 million in funding, valued at $250 million, and officially launched on Binance Alpha and futures on 2025-10-06. It opened at a high of 0.92, but dropped to a low of 0.25 within just three hours, now trading at 0.036, with a historical maximum decline of -96.38%. 9⃣, Regarding the rumor of hype about Nesa's background: ①, NVIDIA background, actually: Being selected for NVIDIA's Inception program, it's free, you can also apply; ②, Google background, actually: included in the AI layer of the Google Cloud program, and get funding for servers and computing, free Google, you can also apply; ③, P&G background, actually: the official announcement says that companies like P&G, a Fortune 50 company, now choose to use Nesa services, what service is not said, anyway, I haven't found substantial evidence from P&G 😂; 🟢Overall, the narrative is practical but the angle is niche, the popularity is average, the background is average, the prospects for implementation are average, no funding but invested in $LYN, the development completion is average, the transparency is average, almost all their assets have been transferred to BSC, what is the point of this, there is really no good reason to look at it; But it touched a bit on AI and privacy, plus the on-chain is very dry, estimated to be the main stage for P small generals, the chips are high-controlled, if the project party doesn't sell or there's market-making, it's estimated to pull for a while, dump the 盘 and it all goes down, so I didn't participate; Finally: Since I had already determined long ago that I wouldn't buy, the formatting is very messy, everyone just make do, the on-chain chips are still being distributed, but I don't want to spend time researching projects I'm not participating in 😂!!

on Nesa · 1214· 4mo ago · negative0

“An underrated super app in the market”Binance Alpha will be listed at 16:00 on March 30, 2026 $BASED: Saving Edition: I think it's underrated, there is a chance to rush! Token contract: 0x1d28d989f9e3ccb8b15d0cec601734514f958e4d Pool composition: 0.0375-0.15：350k usdt + 4.66M $BASED 0.0225-0.525：150k usdt + 2.75M $BASED Pool price: 0.075 Pre-market price: 0.096 Key messages: 1. Based is a Web3 consumer-grade super application built in the Hyperliquid ecosystem, embedded with perpetual contracts + polymarket prediction market + cryptocurrency physical consumption (including crypto debit cards); 2. Based financing of 18.2M, backed by ENA, coinbase, etc., front-end aggregation Hyperliquid and Polymarket, with its own applications and revenue; 3. The pre-market price is 0.096, but the trading volume is very small; 4. Polymarket predicts that FDV after one day will be temporarily reported at 89% for more than 50M, 64% for more than 75M, and 38% for more than 100M; 5. The total amount is 1 billion, 36% is allocated to the community, 24% is in circulation, the details of the airdrop and unlock are unknown, but pre-staking has been launched, and the first 40 million pool has been fully deposited, with a total of 64 million temporarily; There are two major traffic entrances, Hyperliquid and Polymarket, I think 75M must be undervalued, so I bought more than 75M and 100M, 200M Yes on polymarket, after the opening, it is expected to be 0.085-0.1 price, it depends on whether it can be stabilized; In addition, because I often use based, it is inevitable that there will be subjective optimism, and most of the orders placed in polymarket are through based, I believe that the continuous appreciation of polymarket in the future will also be fed back to based, which is the reason why I am more optimistic;

on Based · 1402· 7mo ago0

“The inaction of the founders ruined everything”The founder attributed his greed, ignorance and ignorance to the market and users, and honestly, I hated their products very much, because I couldn't even log in to the account to get back the money I deposited, which is ridiculous, on the one hand, the founder sold tokens to users with a market value estimate of 100 million, and on the other hand, users couldn't get their money back at all, the reality is so ridiculous, and the founder even quibbled that all this was caused by the market, and the founder didn't take any responsibility and left with the money

on Infinex · 1739· 8mo ago · negative0

“Fake news accounts”The makers of fake news all use the form of one breaking fake news and two pictures to deceive traffic

on Coinvo · 1212· 8mo ago · negative0

‹ Back36 of 39 · most upvoted firstMore ›