Profile· Neutral@2024MacBookPro On Ethos

MacBook Pro

2 reviews, 100% of them positive.100% positive · 2 reviews· Influence factor 1, above 0% of accounts

The record

From 2 activities · Jul 2026

MacBook is direct and honest with project feedback, calling out mistakes without hesitation while recognizing strong execution. Known for smooth onboarding and clear, kind communication—helping make the web3 community more welcoming and accessible.

What people say

Received · 2 Given · 39

“Warden is a scam project and has a history of fraud”It is recommended that you do not blow @wardenprotocol The testnet is likely to be a sinkhole!! First, there is no financing/financing fraud This is very simple, no one can find out, the financing of 50 million US dollars is likely to come from the rumors of the "mouth" player; Second, a snapshot was taken for $QRDO voters on March 29, 2024 This is very consistent with the description on the official website: $WARD The first snapshot of the airdrop of some tokens has been completed for early contributors, validators, and testers. This is just the first step among many potential avenues to acquire $WARD airdrop tokens, and subsequent phases will also include participants in our final testnet and users of the Warden App. Ok, we understand that the first phase of the snapshot has been taken, and the second phase includes the testnet + mouth in full swing; Third, clarify the relationship between $QRDO and Warden 1. Warden Protocol is jointly launched by the [QRDO Foundation] and [EQ LAB]; 2. Former Binance executive Josh Goodbody as COO of $QRDO; 3, $QRDO lay off 50% again, with a current workforce of around 50 and more than 200 at the beginning of the year; 4. The [QRDO Foundation] plans to rename the QRDO token to OPEN in the next few weeks; Brief summary: $QRDO transformed into a $OPEN 5, $OPEN 1:1 conversion to $LVVA, $LVVA is now trading at US$0.001773, with a circulating market value of 1.39 million, a total supply of 1.25B, a circulation of 785.79M, and a 90-day decrease of 61.41%; 6. Regarding $OPEN, seed round financing of $11 million, private placement round It raised $16 million, raised $17.25 million in the public offering round, and raised $80 million in Series A at a valuation of $460 million, but the result was a 1:1 conversion to $LVVA with a market value of only 1.39 million, and the performance was not performed??? Judging from the above complex triangular relationship, one vote is enough to veto! ! This is a group of insatiable cannibal RUG team, let's write here for the time being, because I was not interested in this project, the group friends sent it to me, and I was forced to study it, and I didn't really want to post it, but I studied it in line with the research, so let's just record it; $LVVA = Levva $OPEN = Open Custody Protocol = Qredo = $QRDO $OPEN = $LVVA Warden Protocol = Qredo + EQ LAB If I make a mistake, please tell me, I will definitely correct !! Mouth players can definitely be touched, and test network players really don't recommend giving away heads.

on Warden · 1316· 9mo ago · negative0

“Items prepared for the rat barn”First of all, I am not discriminating against Indians, but in the world of web3, Indians always deceive the world and gain huge wealth, unfortunately HeyElsa is another strong proof that Indians are completely untrustworthy in web3, they ask the community to trade, keep trading, earn points, consume your gas and funds, but in the end the team allocated 99% of the tokens to the rat warehouse, and the community can only get one token, which is really ridiculous

on HeyElsa · 413· 9mo ago · negative0

“Analysis of DeepNode”$DN @DeepNodeAI This project is very interesting, the push is talking about the speed of light issuance, creating Twitter in November, financing in December, issuing coins in January, the three-step strategy is extremely smooth! ! Pools added by the project team: 0.04-0.64：450k usdt 0.32-1.28：50k usdt + 35.63k $DN 1.28-16：52.08k $DN 3.19-8.0：537.3k $DN From the perspective of the distribution of funds in the pool, the project side is a bit of a chicken thief, setting a large amount of USDT in the range of 0.04-0.64, which may have two meanings here: 1, 0.04-0.64 is the support level that the project team holds onto, so 450,000 U is set to take over; 2. 0.04-0.64 is the range that the project party deliberately avoids, in order to avoid the use of its own 45U funds; Then set a large number of $DN at the position of 3.2, of course, the purpose is not necessarily to smash the market, after all, there are really not many project parties that use the pool to smash the market, so you can see that 1.28 has obvious support, but it fell below in the early morning, and now it is pulled back; The problem is that there are transfer-out funds on the chain to smash the market, about 5k each time, directly smashed to about 1.2 before stopping, resulting in the problem that the order book thickness is very, very thin, which is why I no longer swing; But after Alpha transferred 1 million $DN to Binance, the project team transferred another 2 million to Binance yesterday, is there a trading competition? So if $DN really drops to around 0.8, I'll catch a little!!

on DeepNode AI · 1113· 9mo ago · negative0

‹ Back39 of 39 · most upvoted first