Profile· Neutral@AdeXBTOn Ethos

AdeXBT (Rich arc)
121 reviews, 98% of them positive.98% positive · 121 reviews· Influence factor 13, above 2% of accountsThe record
From 8 activities · May 2026Known for authentic, honest reviews backed by real evaluation rather than AI-generated content or project shilling. A steady, insightful presence across Web3 communities (Eclipse, Monad, ASC) who brings genuine opportunities to others' attention, offers clear ecosystem breakdowns, and maintains approachable, consistent community engagement without noise-making.
What people say
Received · 121Given · 389“absolute farmers these ones.”opensea will farm its users into oblivion it is obvious they do not care. thread carefully.
on OpenSea · 1891· 12mo ago · negative18
on OpenSea · 1891· 12mo ago · negative18“Another useless l2”Zora was a nft blcokchain, as useless as that sounds for the selling point of any product thats exactly what it was but people still used it, nothing was free on tbis chain, for an l2 it was more expensive to be on zora than to be on ethereum mainnet, everything cost a minimum of 0.5$, at some point zora faked pumps on mints on the cbain to lure in users to get more fees, a total scam of a blockchain, at the end, they allocated all their tokens to themselves and dissappeared afterwards, this one isn't for the records, its for the trash.
on Zora · 659· 1y ago · negative18
on Zora · 659· 1y ago · negative18“Og crypto bro”19teen is a diverse web3 guy. he has this way of finding alphas not regularly available to the majority of web3, he has made me more money than i have made myself .
on n9tin⚡️🔺 · 1336· 1y ago12
on n9tin⚡️🔺 · 1336· 1y ago12“Brings value with sharp insights on rollups, DeFi flows, and token launches.”
on Tippy · 1333· 1y ago12
on Tippy · 1333· 1y ago12“Expected more”Eigenlayer was supposed to be the savior of Ethereum restaking, somehow they found a way to not only mess it up, but become quite questionable with thier actions
on EigenCloud · 1751· 1y ago · neutral17
on EigenCloud · 1751· 1y ago · neutral17“bad team, bad platform”Legion Deserves a Slash Legion deserves a slash, but I won’t be opening one, mainly because their credibility is already incredibly low, which I believe they truly deserve. Let me lay some background. I’ve participated in three sales on Legion in the past. Out of those, only one was profitable and has ever been in the history of legion, while the other two ended with at least a 50% loss at TGE. During the Skatechain sale on Legion, we supported the team and helped push the sale because turnout was quite low. Legion then allowed Skatechain to change the terms of the sale after it had already ended, and TGE didn’t happen when it was supposed to. As a result, all investors went into an immediate 50% loss at TGE. This was made worse by a very buggy claim process on Legion’s end. After that sale, the Legion team announced they were taking a break from launches, as none (except Fuel) had been profitable. The community, though disappointed with all past sales, still supported them and gave advice. Eventually, Legion returned with new roles and activities to keep the community engaged and then came the YieldBasis presale. Here’s how that unfolded: Legion announced a YieldBasis presale at a $200 million FDV, with 40% of the $5 million raise allocated to a merit-based phase before a FCFS phase on Kraken. During the merit-based phase, the website crashed multiple times, maybe understandable. This sale turned out to be one of the worst experiences yet — and trust me, Legion already has a reputation for bad experiences. After the merit-based applications, there was supposed to be a phase where participants received acceptance or rejection emails. That process was even more chaotic. Eventually, Legion made an announcement on Discord, directing investors on how to claim their pledged assets via contract, this was supposed to be a refund and not a withdrawal. But right after that, they released another announcement saying that if you claimed your pledged asset via contract, you wouldn’t receive an allocation. Basically, they misled investors with incorrect instructions. The FCFS phase turned into a sybil mess. To fix things, Legion claimed they had secured more allocation from YieldBasis, promising to consider investors who still had their pledged assets in the contract. After backlash over their misdirection, they later said they’d also consider those who had already withdrawn. In the end, long-time investors who had supported Legion through multiple failed sales were sidelined, while influencers, many of whom were hearing about Legion for the first time, got huge allocations — some as high as $2,500 minimum, while raffled investors got as little as $150 or less. The peak of their dishonesty came when Legion announced that YieldBasis handled the evaluation of merit-based applications, only for YieldBasis to publicly deny any involvement in that process. If everyone is an investor risking the same amount of funds, why favor influencers over your loyal investors? This sale could have gone smoothly — they had fewer than 60,000 applicants, which is manageable compared to other platforms. Projects like BuidlPad and Echo handle far more efficiently, in my opinion. After everything, I’ve decided I won’t be using Legion anymore. For anyone new to their platform, be cautious. Legion has hosted over 20 sales since inception, and only Fuel turned a profit. Every other sale ended in an instant loss at TGE. So beware.
on LEGION · 1546· 1y ago · negative21
on LEGION · 1546· 1y ago · negative21“og easy”Easy comes across as a credible, high-conviction crypto guy with real engagement and a strong reputation inside niche Web3 circles, he stays visible, puts out great content, praised for being honest, approachable, and transparent about wins and losses.
on Easy · 1851· 3mo ago · neutral9
on Easy · 1851· 3mo ago · neutral9“Growth personified”Mr. Tomachukwu has provided invaluable insights, significantly enhancing my understanding of Web3. His expertise in NFTs, DeFi, and emerging ventures is consistently delivered with clarity and precision. His subtle yet sharp analysis has proven instrumental in identifying promising micro-cap opportunities, which I might have otherwise overlooked. His consistent, honest approach establishes him as a leading voice in this field.
on Tomachukwu · 1294· 1y ago9
on Tomachukwu · 1294· 1y ago9“Eclipse og”Creator dj is one of the earliest and sharpest minds on eclipse, although things didnt exactly pan out for the community on eclipse, dj was present in almlst every ama, sharing ideas and thoughts, a very active community participant, something many authentic projects need, dj is one of a kind, eclipse was lucky to have such an enthusiast
on Creator JD · 1287· 1y ago9
on Creator JD · 1287· 1y ago9“Pillar”Also a gallant eclipse and asc supprter, one of the pillars of the asc nft community on eclipse, raids and helps with visibility in the community, if you need someone who will be there day and night to defend the honor of your project, eugene is one of those guys Brick by brick we built together. Eclipse everything
on Eugene · 1240· 1y ago9
on Eugene · 1240· 1y ago9
Someguy
Afi
Grethos
aadvark
Majdi
Donald J. Trump
Bold
Itsakm8
Serpin Taxt
Anton Boiarchuk
Cole West
Cristian P.
stellarobject
Pendle
Shuyao Kong
Wildcall
