AdeXBT (Rich arc)

121 reviews, 98% of them positive.98% positive · 121 reviews· Influence factor 13, above 2% of accounts

The record

From 8 activities · May 2026

Known for authentic, honest reviews backed by real evaluation rather than AI-generated content or project shilling. A steady, insightful presence across Web3 communities (Eclipse, Monad, ASC) who brings genuine opportunities to others' attention, offers clear ecosystem breakdowns, and maintains approachable, consistent community engagement without noise-making.

What people say

Received · 121 Given · 389

“ruggers”Just like many Robinhood NFTs, these were minted for an average or 1.5$, attempted to grift & their proposal to mint another NFT right after the first one got rejected; they decided it would be better to sell off & delete their X account. prev collection name: r0bin brOker's

on h00d RUNNER · 928· 2mo ago · negative6

“rug/scam”Yesterday, my grandmother passed away, so I needed some time to process everything and collect myself. I also needed to take care of the immediate expenses first thanks all this is the tweet the null broker dev made after flooring the collection & accepting bids.

on Null Broker · 928· 2mo ago · negative6

“serial NFT rugger”This user is connected to theunstablenft that attempted to rug users on StableChain. During their "so-called test mint", the team wallet turned out to be his wallet; the user's MO is quite straightforward: > launch NFTs on any & every chain with a mint price & bots to fake hype. > straight-up rug or abandon the project afterwards. > deactivate x. > reactivate x in the future with a new name & a new "innovative nft minting experience"

on Alex Markyui · 1196· 3mo ago · negative6

“scammer”One of the accounts created to grift with the whole Defi United donation goal, they created this x account & lied that they donated $800k to the cause, they also tried to use that to collect donations from innocent users, then went ahead to launch a token, bundle it & accused aave & stannis of not recognizing them, classic old scam but i reckon they might change their name someday after gathering few followers with this stunt

on DeFi United Fund · 927· 6mo ago · negative6

“Lord of the trenches”As far back as i can remember, chromadera is my earliest shitcoin "goona make it" inspiration, he made me look into solana trenches in the first place, bro is super talented in in shitcoining, spots eca, gets signals super early, one of the top traders i know.

on Chromadera · 1309· 1y ago6

“Cool ai”I followed through all the development of eteranl ai, including trying out their ai tool, and i have to say i was pretty impressed with the "build first" approach, they built the product first, put it out for tetsing and usage before ever making an nft, teams you can trust are teams that deliver instead of making promises, this team did just that.

on Eternal AI · 1257· 1y ago6

“Zero knowledge dev”Met mugesto in the boundless discord, never knew devs could be this nice, he achieved gold in boundless, to me it showed dedication, as a community, the integral part is having members who cam be dedicated, who give their all, i saw that in boundless with mugesto

on Mugetso · 1338· 1y ago20

“ruggers”rugged on stable chain, nft name feferNFT, with stables getting traction with memcoins, we see scammers coming out to rug as usual, this is one of those scammers, rugged for 500$

on Fefer · 928· 3mo ago · negative48

“I wish it were possible to group every team member who contributed to Eclipse under a single category: incompetent”Eclipse, Farcaster, and FantasyTop all share the same tragic pattern: strong products and great communities undermined by very bad teams. On the product side, Eclipse delivered a technically interesting Layer 2 combining Solana’s SVM with Ethereum’s security. Farcaster created a compelling social protocol, and FantasyTop built an engaging game and community. But in all three cases, poor leadership and mismanagement took priority over long‑term alignment with their users. Poor community treatment and communication Across Eclipse and similar projects, community members who invested time, attention, and money were often treated dismissively, labeled as “farmers” or “sybils” instead of being recognized as early supporters. Communication during key moments was unclear or missing, and concerns were brushed aside rather than addressed with transparency. Promises were delayed, delivered half‑baked, or abandoned altogether, creating a deep sense of betrayal among genuine contributors.

on Eclipse · 383· 5mo ago · negative18

“Best nft lead ive seen”Karma is probably my most significant reason for being in monad nft, if you kmow you her, just by following her x , you'd see she has a different approach to doing things, she is one of the reason mlnad nft are popping even on testnet, open to contributions, very engaging, smart, and very much community oriented, monad nft couldn't have asked for a better a lead.

on Karma · 1579· 1y ago20

“Had a good run”Metamask is one of the top wallets, but at some point it was the number one decentralized wallet, they stopped shipping updates, the wallet became too buggy, and the struggled with adoption, all this seem to be a thing of the past as the wallet is now better than its worst days, hopefully the development can continue

on MetaMask 🦊 · 1861· 1y ago · neutral23

“Cheap Ruggers”They advertised themselves as a launch platform on rh & bsc, their mechanics was supposed to be simple, you connect your x & wallet address on the platform, hold 0.1eth in your wallet & get access to the first 10% of any token launched on the platform, contracts are supposed to be verified & liq locked forever. Their first token ca: 0x075daCEbB5fc98405bAA8AC3a35Dd43aF7574212 on rh, team decides to pull liquidity at 13k mcap. The X account is yet to make any announcement on this. I suppose they’ll change their name soon & take down the platform So previous name on X: luluu_fun Website: luluu(dot)fun

on Luluu · 929· 2mo ago · negative5

‹ Back336 of 389 · most upvoted firstMore ›