AdeXBT (Rich arc)

121 reviews, 98% of them positive.98% positive · 121 reviews· Influence factor 13, above 2% of accounts

The record

From 8 activities · May 2026

Known for authentic, honest reviews backed by real evaluation rather than AI-generated content or project shilling. A steady, insightful presence across Web3 communities (Eclipse, Monad, ASC) who brings genuine opportunities to others' attention, offers clear ecosystem breakdowns, and maintains approachable, consistent community engagement without noise-making.

What people say

Received · 121 Given · 389

“hyperevm finest”i have been using prjx for the longest time on hyperevm. As a small user, I personally do not appreciate the point system; I am obviously biased. Neither do I like the referral system, & just a few hours ago, they removed the point system. I will continue exploring HyperEVm via prjx. I think Lombard and the team have built something cool here.

on Project X · 1618· 5mo ago · neutral15

“racist”I'm not one to do this, but racism should be frowned upon anywhere. This individual has recently been caught in many utterances where he called Nigerians (Africans) "apes." This is absolutely unacceptable & should be frowned upon. I understand in the recent situation that a project he collaborated with, and the cm's that reached out to him initially were both Nigerian & indian, but to go ahead & generalize a nation of people as "apes"? he deserves a slash to zero for this. its okay to laugh at a project and be like "oh its not an European project or an American project." its not okay to be racist towards anyone because of the coloUr of their skin or their nationality. SAY NO TO RACISM.

on bros / bad actor · 1395· 8mo ago · negative13

“gud tek but bad launch”I would assume everyone knows this, but you are solely responsible for how you use your funds. When Zama carried out its ICO, I had a feeling a lot would go wrong when it seemed the team kept pushing for a clearing price above 0.05, clearly trying to influence the outcome of the ICO. It wouldn’t be surprising if it eventually comes out that they unfairly influenced it by bidding themselves. That being said, the founder was seen multiple times telling users to bid above 0.05. After the sale, they allowed Binance Alpha users to buy at 0.025. This eventually turned everything catastrophic. Let it be known that they opened below the clearing FDV that they pushed users to bid above. I wasn't affected by this, as I am not that naive, but the team itself called for it; tread carefully with these ones.

on Zama · 1552· 9mo ago · neutral13

“Bitcoin og collection”One of the few nfts on bitcoin that definitely made a mark, their contributions to the ecosystem is undeniable

on NodeMonkes ◉ · 1569· 1y ago13

“The bad, the worse, the ugly”Pumpdotfun is everything wrong with the web3 crypto community right now, at a time when web3 projects/users need to make sacrifices for the greater good and the future of this ecosystem, projects like pdfun do the exact opposite, after taking about 600million dollars in fees, after ruining the life of many while enriching the free, they go ahead to make a token sale in a time like this, 2025, a trying time for all of crypto! They go ahead to attempt a token sale at 4bn fdv, this is daylight robbery, not only will this suck out liquidity, but this will also cause more and more people to lose money, but these guys dont care, all it seems they care about is enriching their pockets, we need projects like this gone from web3, but they wont ever, when this goes away into the bad history books, the team behind it will come up with more and more things to swindle the community, there might come a time when the need for a great ourge will arise, a total reset to make crypto great again. Pumpdotfun doesn't deserve what has been given to it, i say damn the consequences. Bad reviews always for this project and the team behind it. Lets do better

on Pump.fun · 847· 1y ago · negative13

“GurixCrypto provides concise guides on emerging platforms, helping the community stay informed about the latest in Web3.”

on Gurix · 1413· 1y ago4

“A dedicated crypto enthusiast, Cryptolady070 contributes valuable insights, enhancing collaborative dialogues.”

on CryptoLady · 1261· 1y ago4

“Femi's content offers valuable perspectives on crypto trading, and he maintains open communication with his followers.”

on Olaniyi0xF · 1272· 1y ago4

“chill guy”Everyone might want to kick on this guy when he is down(not down in money ofc) but lets make somethings clear, frank is a top guy, frank took degods from the slums to the top, yes the succes got into his head and he became delulu, i dont appreciate the fact that he abndoned his projects especially after extracting so much i remember the other mints he carried out on sol, it was probably one of the biggest mints on solana till date, if he puts his mind into something he makes it work, he chickened out of solana when sol went down to 8$ and that to me was a bad move no one should move that way, he has made alot of mistakes but i believe redemption is possible for this guy

on Frank · 1088· 5mo ago · neutral10

“Solana no.1 supporter”Ansem's unwavering commitment to Solana is exemplary, showcasing his intelligence and significant contributions to the ecosystem. His support for numerous Solana projects is commendable, particularly his responsible approach to avoid negatively impacting his community. However, Ethereum remains a superior platform, and the broader Web3 space would benefit from more individuals emulating Ansem's dedication.

on Ansem 🐂🀄️ · 1836· 1y ago10

“@dkeedx shares high-signal takes across L1s and L2s. Smart thread work and early calls make him worth watching.”

on Juicey Baby · 1330· 1y ago9

“I am giving this project a neutral review and i will state my reasons below”Boundless is a risc zkvm project that hopes to have a use cases like trustless cross-chain bridges, ZK-rollups, and privacy-preserving oracles. It aims to make ZK proofs accessible and affordable, the tech is actually really good, but neutral review goes towards their approach which i participated in recently, boundless had a campaign where their users were asked to generate proof and vote on chains, each week users had to pay about 8$ (non refundable) to do this, this happened every single week, they also reaised about $50m, but somehow it seems they also want to have a presale, all of this is beginning to look like a big "bubble" of user extraction, now you might see awhole lot of positive reviews about them right now, i will advise you wait post tge to decide whether they are truthful reviews or not.

on Boundless · 1433· 1y ago · neutral11

‹ Back360 of 389 · most upvoted firstMore ›