Profile· Neutral@AdeXBTOn Ethos

AdeXBT (Rich arc)
121 reviews, 98% of them positive.98% positive · 121 reviews· Influence factor 12, above 2% of accountsThe record
From 8 activities · May 2026Known for authentic, honest reviews backed by real evaluation rather than AI-generated content or project shilling. A steady, insightful presence across Web3 communities (Eclipse, Monad, ASC) who brings genuine opportunities to others' attention, offers clear ecosystem breakdowns, and maintains approachable, consistent community engagement without noise-making.
What people say
Received · 121Given · 389“My second review”This is my second yet still neutral review on Linea as a chain. For an L2, they didn't do a good job with their TGE, and that says a lot. I am not a biased individual, so this review isn't about allocation, as I got a pretty decent four-figure allocation. This is about the tech. Linea is in the same playing field as Optimism, Arbitrum, and other good L2s, but during their TGE, the chain basically went under for about 24 hours. Gas spiked up to 1 ETH per transaction for an L2? I think the devs on this one need to do better. Transactions went to a total halt. This isn’t what L2s should be like, as the so-called "better than mainnet" chains. So product-wise, the team behind this needs to do better. The same issue happened during their campaigns, where users paid up to $10 for days on end as a gas fee. Not a good chain.
on Linea.eth · 1582· 1y ago · neutral51
on Linea.eth · 1582· 1y ago · neutral51“ruggers”The same scammers behind Solanagpu are behind this, solanagpu rugged for around 10k$ worth of Sol. They have since deleted every tweet of their rug & changed their name to "gaffysol." I made a negative review on them "https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/676765/scam-scam-scam" Ever since they changed names, they have gone ahead to open another X account and are now trying to run another presale with a similar name "avxgpu"( clearly no effort was put into the name) stay away from them, they are scammers, their website has no backend, they will try to rug again. do not send any tokens to them, do not interact with the website, report the account if you can.
on Solomun.base.eth · 910· 8mo ago · negative40
on Solomun.base.eth · 910· 8mo ago · negative40“God forbid the stupidest team quits crypto”This project, for whatever reason, decided to inside trade their own presale on Polymarket. For what it's worth, we can all agree that 90% of teams do this, whether they admit it or not, but these guys are unique. Their Polymarket account name was "p2p team." You see, their own name is p2pdotme, so maybe they weren't trying to hide it in the first place, except they only publicly came out wth a notice after they got caught. I wouldn't bet my money on this horse.
on P2P.me · 1068· 7mo ago · negative39
on P2P.me · 1068· 7mo ago · negative39“Nft enthusiast”Building portfolio with digital art is beast specialty, if this is your aim you want beast on your team
on BEAST · 1354· 1y ago38
on BEAST · 1354· 1y ago38“ruggers”a-nonym launched an NFT on Robinhood and appears to have rug-pulled after minting. The team had assured buyers that the total mint funds would be pooled into a token, but after mint, they bridged the funds out of Robinhood to Binance. There has been no communication on X, and everything points to a rug pull.
on a-nonym · 910· 3mo ago · negative124
on a-nonym · 910· 3mo ago · negative124“scammer/ruggers”The same entity behind stocked.fish, the project that rugged on Robinhood, X was deleted the same time. Check out my review on stocled.fish to understand better. https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/715050/scam-on-robinhood They also rug-pulled their token & removed liquidity. ca for token: 0x9b356dF06Dfb9254FBf0cA3f567E6fC55EfA1Both both accounts are deactivated at the moment.
on AquareumFi · 928· 57d ago · negative110
on AquareumFi · 928· 57d ago · negative110“His reputation apparently precedes him”His reputation apparently precedes him. Among his numerous atrocities, Cole launched Spritehood. While teasing Spritehood, he said it would be free for anyone minting at some point, and he even held a raffle in which one winner was set to receive a personalized NFT. Cole later stealthily launched Spritehood, making it a 44k collection at a 0.0099 ETH mint price (around $18) per mint. He also made one of the NFTs cost $117 to mint, and about 6,000 to 7,000 people minted it. Yes, it sold out in less than an hour, but he clearly is a user and someone who takes advantage of situations. He saw the NFT frenzy on Robinhood and simply capitalized on it in the worst way, cashing approximately $1.3 million from mint alone. Yes, at the time of this review, the floor price is up, and no one who minted is at a loss, but that is only for now. What happens afterwards?
on Cole · 1076· 2mo ago · negative36
on Cole · 1076· 2mo ago · negative36“scammer scammer scammer”this user (for future purposes as all signal points to him/her always reactivating the account and changing the name) is a scammer, he/she runs presale, asks for funds then delete the messages and deactivates their account, i am hoping ethos api might be able to still reflect the review for the account even if he/she comes back with another username, a certified scammer.
on ⚍ · 1184· 8mo ago · negative36
on ⚍ · 1184· 8mo ago · negative36“rug”same mode of opertaion as the others, claim to have a good working tech on rh, make a website that shows absolutely nothing even though there is a wallet connection & it appears as if somethings actually work website: https://rove.finance/ (taken off) ca 0x15251f602c76ac62c83f2b4f25706082ad2d6409 X has been deactivated.
on Rove Finance · 928· 36d ago · negative62
on Rove Finance · 928· 36d ago · negative62“Not a bad guy if he doesn't want to be”Everyone might want to kick on this guy when he is down(not down in money ofc) but lets make somethings clear, frank is a top guy, frank took degods from the slums to the top, yes the succes got into his head and he became delulu, i dont appreciate the fact that he abndoned his projects especially after extracting so much i remember the other mints he carried out on sol, it was probably one of the biggest mints on solana till date, if he puts his mind into something he makes it work, he chickened out of solana when sol went down to 8$ and that to me was a bad move no one should move that way, he has made alot of mistakes but i believe redemption is possible for this guy
on Frank · 1084· 1y ago · neutral34
on Frank · 1084· 1y ago · neutral34“Failed chain”Starknet airdrop campaign seems to have fallen short of expectations, leaving many community members feeling underwhelmed. This has unfortunately resulted in a noticeable decline in user engagement and participation across various platforms. The initial excitement and anticipation have been replaced with a sense of disappointment and imminent failure
on Starknet · 445· 1y ago · negative34
on Starknet · 445· 1y ago · negative34“scammers”$CLEAR is officially live on Solana. Contract: 3F4RucW6ifHm3kDu89e6TkcbTfxjybG21B586Wb3pump This token is the programmable-fee sandbox for Solana. Full breakdown below as we publish https://clear.fun: this tweet was deleted 5minutes later. their bio reads "built on robinhood at the moment" the team bundled the token & instant sold at 20k marketcap, i suspect they've been doing this for some days now, stay safe.
on clear.fun · 921· 20d ago · negative59
on clear.fun · 921· 20d ago · negative59
Someguy
Afi
Grethos
Abhi | AP Collective @ Token 2049 🇸🇬
aadvark
Anton Boiarchuk
Cuzzo 🛡️
Biti8
vitalik.eth
MLO
Coinbase Ventures 🛡️
gabriel shapiro
一川drive 🔴
aiobkhan ✨