MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓351aadvark↓277Majdi↓266TradeSk0rp.eth↑48.8%Ethos↓1.5%Brandon scott↑1.0%vitalik.eth↑1.7%VouchesSyrup69 WHUF → OSFDpuck (bob)50 WHUF → freshout.ape 🍄🦍Samorityanin🧢20 WHUF → 一川drive 🔴Samorityanin🧢20 WHUF → d1namitReviews一川drive 🔴positive · 78 upvotesMark Karpelèspositive · 69 upvotesaiobkhan ✨positive · 47 upvotesRiyonegative · 26 upvotes
Profile· Untrusted@EclipseFNDOn Ethos
Eclipse

Eclipse

703 reviews, 26% of them positive.26% positive · 703 reviews· Influence factor 91, above 18% of accounts

The record

From 225 activities · Mar 2026

Eclipse is a Layer 2 blockchain that promised fairness and community-driven development but systematically betrayed supporters through unfair token distribution, poor airdrop execution, and dismissive leadership. Early community members and ASC NFT holders who invested time and money felt farmed and excluded, while the team prioritized insiders and later engaged in bear-posting about their own project. The chain has become a ghost town with minimal adoption, abandoned apps, and widespread reports of scamming behavior, broken promises, and toxic community management.

“The Tarnished Ambition Eclipsed by Governance Scandal”@EclipseFND markets itself as the next-generation Layer‑2 bridging Ethereum and Solana, promising scalable innovation and high throughput. But behind the tech-forward veneer, there’s a messy legacy that fundamentally undermines trust—and ultimately undercuts the project’s credibility. What stands out most is the severity of internal failure. The project's founder, Neel Somani, resigned amid serious sexual misconduct allegations and a governance scandal involving undisclosed token allocations worth over $13 million. That kind of opaque, insider behavior isn't just a PR hiccup—it’s a foundational fracture in how the ecosystem governs and distributes value. The CEO change that followed felt reactive, not responsible. On the ground, the execution hasn't matched the pitch. Reddit users in earlier cycles cautioned that EclipseToken was a likely rug-pull, citing a lack of transparency, unverifiable ownership, and a pattern of disappearing liquidity. Words like "can't sell the token" and "FUD" warnings were common—even community moderators reportedly locked out critical posts. While tokenomics, dev tooling, and cross-chain mechanics get praised on official channels, the human cost—of disillusioned investors, internal betrayal, and failed disclosure—largely overshadows the code. It's one thing to build a chain; it's another not to check who’s controlling access, allocation, and optics. In short, @EclipseFND is a case study in how governance missteps and ethical collapse can eclipse even the most ambitious tech vision. If you're drawn to flashy Layer‑2 roadmaps, look. But if you care about structure, accountability, and truth behind the token, don't expect that from this project.esquirebrazy.base.eth · 1285· 1y ago · negative13
‹ Back252 of 703 · most upvoted firstMore ›