Eclipse

704 reviews, 26% of them positive.26% positive · 704 reviews· Influence factor 90, above 18% of accounts

The record

From 204 activities · Mar 2026

Eclipse is widely characterized as a failed Layer 2 project that betrayed its community through unfair token distribution, broken promises, and poor execution. Early supporters—including NFT holders and active testnet participants—report feeling scammed after the TGE resulted in token price collapse, inadequate airdrops, and mass layoffs. The team faced criticism for toxic leadership, dismissive treatment of community members (labeling them as farmers and sybils), and a shift from long-term vision to short-term value extraction. The chain remains largely abandoned with minimal TVL and user activity, while leadership controversies—including allegations against founder Neel Somani—further eroded trust.

What people say

Received · 704 Given · 0

“When I first experienced a chain of cancer”I had so much trust put into the growth of a chain, but I didn't see any evidence of trustworthiness, and the chain had spams that looked exactly like this.

Gera | ETHGas ⛽ · 1248· 8mo ago · negative0

么ᴍɑӏυτɑ.ρɾᴏ么 · 1186· 8mo ago · negative0

“The Architecture Behind Faster Web3”Ethereum’s fastest Layer 2 powered by the SVM represents a major leap forward in blockchain performance. This project combines cutting-edge scalability with real execution speed, creating an environment where developers can build without the usual limitations that slow innovation. What makes it even more compelling is the team behind it — the minds connected to @humanapi bring serious technical depth and a forward-thinking approach to infrastructure. The result is a Layer 2 ecosystem designed not just for today’s demands, but for the next generation of high-performance decentralized applications. This is the kind of technology that pushes Ethereum’s boundaries while staying focused on usability, efficiency, and developer empowerment. A strong signal of where scalable Web3 is heading.

Maduma · 1269· 8mo ago0

“Ethos score is too low which signals alot of uncertainty. so id rather pass this time. id wont risk it”

ᵀᵉˢᶠᵃʸᵉ · 1230· 8mo ago · negative0

“Bad and a scam project”No need to talk deep about it, the score really talk itself. Go to ZERO

Grozy · 1231· 8mo ago · negative0

“Disappointing Presence and Unclear Direction”Honestly, following EclipseFND has been more frustrating than useful. The account feels scattered, with posts that hype things up but rarely explain anything in a clear or meaningful way. It gives off the vibe of chasing attention rather than building real value or trust in the community. There’s also a lack of transparency. Updates feel surface-level, and it’s hard to understand what the long term plan even is. Projects that want real supporters should focus on communication, consistency, and actual progress, not just noise. Overall, it feels like style over substance, and that’s not a great look for something that wants to be taken seriously. Until the team improves clarity and delivers real results, it’s hard to stay impressed.

DevDua.eth · 1214· 9mo ago · negative0

“Scam”Do not wanna waste my time to write a thing about that.

Yetiker · 1284· 9mo ago · negative0

“Community isn’t prioritized”It didn’t feel like the community was treated as a priority. early supporters didn’t seem valued which hurt trust.

prachi 🫎 · 1219· 9mo ago · negative0

“One of the worst chain”Eclipse farmed their users for a long time with senseless tapping game just to completely ignore and disappoint them with one of the worst airdrop distribution ever.

Awais Onchain · 1237· 9mo ago · negative0

“dead on arrival”nawala yung mga team pa isa isa maraming nalugi dahil sa nft nila

Agent LXIX 💰 · 1287· 9mo ago · negative0

“Questionable Emerging Blockchain Project”Eclipse sits at a very low positive vouch rate of just 31% with a noticeable amount of "No" responses, which is unusual for projects that gain real traction. From what I've seen in community channels and early discussions, there's been inconsistent updates, vague roadmap delivery, and some concerns around team transparency and token distribution. A few users have reported poor communication during testnet phases and unresolved issues with bridging or performance claims not matching reality. The low trust signal combined with minimal staked value suggests caution is warranted. I'd avoid any significant involvement or exposure until much clearer progress, stronger community consensus, and better on-chain metrics emerge. Definitely DYOR thoroughly and treat this as high-risk until proven otherwise.

Vahid · 1160· 9mo ago0

“scam”gasuka dengan eclipse karena ga adil

ukhti masm.ink 🚢 · 1268· 9mo ago · negative0

‹ Back672 of 704 · most upvoted firstMore ›