MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓351aadvark↓277Majdi↓266TradeSk0rp.eth↑48.8%Ethos↓1.5%Brandon scott↑1.0%vitalik.eth↑1.7%VouchesSyrup69 WHUF → OSFDpuck (bob)50 WHUF → freshout.ape 🍄🦍Samorityanin🧢20 WHUF → 一川drive 🔴Samorityanin🧢20 WHUF → d1namitReviews一川drive 🔴positive · 78 upvotesMark Karpelèspositive · 69 upvotesaiobkhan ✨positive · 49 upvotesRiyonegative · 31 upvotes
Profile· Neutral@EdemHavilaOn Ethos
edemhavila

edemhavila

50 reviews, 100% of them positive.100% positive · 50 reviews· Influence factor 2, above 0% of accounts

The record

From 50 activities · Jul 2026

A multifaceted Web3 builder deeply embedded in the SUI ecosystem who combines technical development with creative expression. Known for creating mini-games (Rialo Jump, doodle jump-style games), sharp on-chain analysis and research, AI art generation, and distinctive Shrek-themed content that cuts through hype with genuine insight. Consistently active across Discord and Farcaster communities, helping newcomers, identifying early gems like Seal and Walrus, and contributing to projects including Rialo, Sahara AI, Legacy Link, and others—blending data-driven perspectives with humor and cultural commentary.

“Disappointment and Unmet Expectations”I’ve been an active member of the Sahara AI community on Discord for months, and unfortunately, the recent reward distribution was deeply disappointing and felt unfair to many dedicated contributors. Firstly, Gold users, who spent months actively engaging and earning their roles, were completely overlooked in the reward system. Similarly, external community roles, which added significant value to the ecosystem, were not recognized or rewarded at all. Creators, who invested countless hours producing content and supporting the project, received extremely modest compensation - completely disproportionate to the effort they put in. To make matters worse, Platinum users, who also committed months of work to earn their status, were rewarded with the same meager amount as three creators combined. This lack of differentiation and appreciation is disheartening. Moreover, the project concluded much earlier than originally announced, leaving many users without enough time to complete their goals or fully participate. The in-project shop was practically useless and served no meaningful purpose. Rewards for participating in the closed testnet were also minimal, despite early promises suggesting otherwise. Overall, Sahara AI promised a lot but delivered very little. The way the community was treated - especially those who were most committed - feels dismissive and ungrateful. I hope the team takes this feedback seriously and reevaluates how they recognize and reward real community involvement.on Sahara AI 🔆 · 1543· 1y ago · negative13
‹ Back72 of 82 · most upvoted firstMore ›