₿it.btc

4 reviews, 75% of them positive.75% positive · 4 reviews· Influence factor 0, above 0% of accounts

The record

From 4 activities · Jul 2026

Active community contributor known for in-depth research and consistent engagement on X and Discord. Delivers solid technical work with good judgment and timely delivery, paired with humility and genuine community focus. One review flagged AI-generated content.

What people say

Received · 4 Given · 60

“my personal opinion very bad user experience”I don't like there UI and KYC mechanism Withdrawal issues are the biggest problem, delayed or there is a discrepancy in the payment amount. Customer support is terrible mostly bots answer, hard to get real human help, emails/chat take a long time. Cost is slightly higher than competitors. Sometimes command execution errors and solution conflicts also occur.

on Kalshi · 1694· 4mo ago · negative0

“Whale Controlled & Manipulated Oracle, Controversial Oracle with Serious Trust Issues”The 4-5 wallets held by those with leverage hold approximately 43-50% of the voting power. Whales are making decisions based on their polymarket bets. Clearly false and manipulative outcomes have been observed in many high value markets. Retail traders are repeatedly suffering significant losses. Governance has become completely centralized and in the hands of whales. My personal opinion: The promise of a true and decentralized oracle has completely failed. It has now become a tool for whales to make personal profits. Trust in the community has virtually vanished. Stay away from UMA for now. Whale manipulation and poor decisions make this project extremely risky and untrustworthy. Strong warning!

on UMA · 280· 4mo ago · negative0

“Promising but Still Immature”I've used @octra's testnet and recently checked it out. Project Hypergraph is working on FHE (Fully Homomorphic Encryption), which allows computation on encrypted data without decryption. Technically strong and innovative technology. Private DeFi, confidential AI, and encrypted computing show real potential. The team is active and speaks out against scammers. Adoption is still in its early stages (mass usage hasn't been seen even after the mainnet launch). Competition is intense in the FHE space. Typical new project like execution and token risks will be present. This seems like a real-tech project, with more substance than hype. But patience is still required. This is a high risk high reward category project.

on octra · 1442· 4mo ago · neutral0

“Useful but Needs Improvement”I’ve been using @RevokeCash frequently for the last 3.5 years. It’s one of the most trusted platforms to check and revoke token approvals. What I like:- Super fast and reliable Works on 100+ networks Open source and transparent What’s missing:- No proper detection for spam tokens Fake/malicious approvals are not highlighted well Needs better filtering and smarter UX Overall it’s a solid and helpful tool for wallet safety, but it still feels incomplete. I give it 7/10. Definitely worth using, but don’t expect it to be perfect yet. If you care about wallet security, you should use it regularly. Just know its limitations.

on Revoke.cash · 1696· 5mo ago0

“Strong but Highly Manipulated This platform is not for everyone.”I’ve been using Polymarket for the past 1.5 years. It’s a strong prediction market with good liquidity across politics, crypto, sports, weather, entertainment, and many other categories. However, I’ve personally seen many markets being highly manipulated (especially BTC 5min and similar short term markets). There have also been multiple cases of insider trading (soldiers, Google employees, and others using non public information). Trading without deep knowledge is extremely risky you can lose money very quickly. Only trade in categories where you have real expertise. It has good potential if used responsibly but due to heavy manipulation and insider activity it’s not suitable for beginners or casual users. Be very careful your funds are at risk.

on Polymarket · 1389· 5mo ago0

“"OG KOL" behavior is never like this.”His Twitter profile appeared several times in my Twitter follow list, but I saw his tweets but didn't follow him. Because he presents his posts very cleverly and has a big reason behind each of his tweets... The guy is full of confidence, but some of his opinions seem wrong and overconfident to me. Despite having 1.3M+ followers, I also saw links to some rug-related projects. Promoting wrong things with such a large audience seems dangerous. Always Strong DYOR and be careful!

on Alex Becker 🍊🏆🥇 · 763· 5mo ago · negative0

“Best Daily Crypto News Account”I've been following @zoomerfied for quite some time, and it's one of my top news accounts. What benefits I've found: I get the fastest and most important crypto news first. Posts are short, clean, and to the point. Polymarket odds are regularly provided. Very fast updates, Less noise, Neutral and reliable. If you want clean, daily crypto news without any fuss, be sure to follow @zoomerfied. I personally don't miss it. Highly recommended for traders and active users.

on zoomer · 1643· 5mo ago0

“Genuine Privacy Coin, Still Relevant”I think it is still a mature and true privacy coin. With zk-SNARKs technology, it keeps the sender, recipient and amount of money truly hidden a feature that very few projects offer these days. Pros: It is quite reliable for true private payments, remittances and business use. Private DeFi and tokens are also being launched through ZSA (Shielded Assets). NU7 upgrade testnet is live and the ecosystem is slowly building. Its usage is still growing slowly. There is always pressure from regulators on privacy coins. It is not a very talked about coin, but it is one of the best options for those who need privacy. I am monitoring it for the long term. Bottom line: If you like true privacy, it is worth following. It seems like a reliable project.

on Zcash 🛡️ · 1520· 5mo ago0

“Heavy promotion Community fraud @billions_ntwk”As a user who has been collecting tokens for months, I feel completely cheated. @billions_ntwk They showed a big dream of ZK Identity and AI verification, and attracted over 2.5 million users through tasks, referrals, and PowerPoint presentations. The massive campaign created a fear of missing out (FOMO). What happened after TGE (May 4, 2026) * The price of the tokens immediately dropped. * The team and insiders sold off a huge amount of tokens. * The airdrop tokens were locked or their price was significantly reduced. * Retail users suffered huge losses. Now the entire user community is angry comments like cheated, retail users were pushed, and money stolen are everywhere. They collected tokens from users and used them, and betrayed them after launch. This is a common scam tactic. they also loot user DATA for free

on Billions Network · 683· 5mo ago · negative0

“there are a number of warning signs.”Young founder (@useKled), real product, $9M funding, high energy. Past rug allegations, Nigeria fraud issue, heavy drama High risk. Follow with caution only. Strong DYOR! The truth is that my friend recommended it to me but I never tried it because I did not want to give my personal data to any untrusted company.

on Avi Patel · 923· 5mo ago · neutral0

“It's a DeSci Project in Crypto filed”Building a decentralized financial layer for biotech. Accelerating drug discovery by running an AI agent (PeptAI) and BioDAO. Benefits: Support from Binance Labs Real science + practical application of AI Transparent team (problems are resolved quickly) Risks: FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt) and skepticism about tokens High implementation risk (in the biotech field) This is a genuine attempt at bridging the world of science and crypto. If you like science and crypto, you can follow it. But do your research thoroughly before investing in tokens this is a risky project.

on Bio Protocol · 1540· 5mo ago0

“Legit RWA Play with Real Traction”@phygitals is a reliable physical collectibles platform – each digital card is backed, vaulted and insured 1:1 by real graded physical cards (Pokemon, Sports, One Piece etc). It runs on Solana, has over $200 million in volume, over 100,000 cards tokenized and generates good fees. Pros: Proven fair packs + instant buybacks (85-90%) Marketplace, PON, physical shipping are all smooth Active team, regular updates, featured in Solana ecosystem Cons (from public data): Old marketing complaints (2025), some transparency on pack odds is being talked about Opening packs = gambling risk overall A genuine RWA project that is liquidating physical cards on-chain. High volume and real utility are visible. If you're interested in collectibles + Solana, it might be worth checking out (but do your own research and only risk money). It still seems to be in the early stages.

on phygitals · 1515· 5mo ago0

‹ Back48 of 60 · most upvoted firstMore ›