Profile· Untrusted@Ethereum_Maxis On Ethos

Ethereum Maxis

485 reviews, 14% of them positive.14% positive · 485 reviews· Influence factor 14, above 3% of accounts

The record

From 11 activities · Mar 2026

Known for misleading followers and taking advantage of community trust, resulting in significant financial losses—including over $1M defrauded through an NFT mint. Rebranded multiple times while maintaining the same pattern of broken promises, manipulation, and deception. Deletes critical comments and has publicly admitted to lying for personal gain.

What people say

Received · 485 Given · 0

“Grifter”Alucard is a typical example of what a founder/partner that onchain users should avoid. If there is ever a project you found this guy a part of, avoid that project. He contributed immensly to the mess that took place in Eclipse. He was the frontier in that theft system

Orshengnudor · 1203· 1y ago · negative9

“ALUCARD IS A THIEF”he created an nft collection told the community that it is the face of eclipse. 10k collection $120 per mint. he deceived the whole community and hype the nft , made crazy money from fees and royalty gaslighted everyone that sold. only for him to drop $es token that is less than the mint price. he is a bad actor and a cancer to web3

onlycrypto · 1266· 1y ago · negative9

“Scammer”scammed community and full of ego

Aman · 1300· 1y ago · negative9

“He's a very bad boy”Alucard is a proper con artist who has scammed the eclipse community of their Eth through an nft mint. After the tge, he also proposed the launch of another bitz-like Ponzi to further scam the community. He deserves no place in the gathering of civilised people.

caligraphy (❖) · 1282· 1y ago · negative9

“Picture of evil”He's practically the epitome of how to destroy a community. I suspect he's young, and he's become intoxicated with power and money, and instead of rewarding his community, he's used it to destroy it. He's essentially destroyed himself. He's now talking badly about everyone except a few people, most people have blocked him, and he's close to resigning from Eclipse anyway.

Trader Opusa 𒆠 · 1267· 1y ago · negative9

“Manipulation Disguised as Leadership”Alucard led Eclipse with ego, not ethics. From biased airdrops to silencing critics, his actions reflect control, not community. It wasn’t Web3 it was WebMe

0xAris!!🟨 · 1209· 1y ago · negative9

“In Web3, leadership is tested not by hype, but by how you handle criticism. Blocking isn’t leading.”Alucard holds several important titles >< Community Lead at @eclipseFND and Co-founder of @asclubnft >< but leadership isn’t just about positions. It’s about how you engage with people. In Web3, community feedback is everything. Leaders should be open to questions, even criticism, and respond with clarity, not defensiveness. Unfortunately, Alucard has repeatedly shown resistance to healthy discourse. Instead of engaging critics in meaningful conversation, he often responds by blocking them, creating more division than understanding. For someone representing a public-facing project, this approach reflects a lack of basic community and human relationship management. Leadership is not just about rallying supporters, but about listening, evolving, and leading with humility. The situation at ASC Club, where Alucard was also a co-founder, is another example that raises questions about his approach to accountability and long-term vision. It’s a reminder that in crypto, titles mean little without the values and maturity to back them up.

(𝙁𝙇𝙊𝙒*) · 1278· 1y ago · negative9

“Sold Hype, Ignored Real Work”Eclipse started with a lot of promise and got thousands of people involved who genuinely contributed their time and effort. But Alucard turned that trust into a joke by handing out $eclipse tokens to his own circle, ignoring the people who actually helped build the network. The roadmap, the promises… turns out they were mostly just for show. On top of that, throwing shade at other projects and leaders just made things worse. Instead of leading, he caused division. Giving rewards to friends while ignoring real contributors completely ruins the spirit of Web3. There’s no other way to call it this was a betrayal of the community.

Küçük Esnaf · 1243· 1y ago · negative9

“I think this is the most arrogant Community Lead that I ever see You might agree with him or else you might get blocked”

Yellok · 1176· 1y ago · negative9

“Wasted proper use case”Eclipse trying to solve a proper issue in crypto industry by putting Ethereum as a gas token in Solana chain. But this man Wasted this proper solution successfully. He betrayed the users of this Eclipse chain and airdropped useless tokens to users. Thrustless man.

Malindu🧙(❖,❖) · 1226· 1y ago · negative9

“Virtual traitor”He was a talented person from our community who accepted a tempting offer an offer to betray the community members in the members' money He was from this very community, but for the sake of money, he agreed to betray it. Lying, encouraging others to make risky and baseless investments, deceiving the OGs for blind support, and unfairly sabotaging rival projects Silencing the voices of those protesting injustice in a dictatorial manner, attacking accounts that aimed to bring transparency And thousands of wrongdoings that many have pointed out He's recently been playing the role of someone who's been deceived, but we all know a yellow dog is the brother of a jackal he's just a traitor

noraalo 🌻🦣 · 1301· 1y ago · negative9

“Alucard & the Eclipse Team: Arrogant, Hypocritical, and Out of Touch”Alucard – the so-called Community Lead – and the rest of the Eclipse team never stop bragging: Eclipse is “as secure as Ethereum,” “as fast as Solana,” with “deep liquidity” and a “thriving ecosystem.” The reality? Just empty arrogance. For months, they’ve been farming attention and postponing the airdrop, only to deliver a mediocre distribution that completely ignores the real supporters of the ecosystem – those who’ve been active and contributing for nearly two years. Instead, they rewarded users with the “Eclipse OG” role – most of whom just mindlessly shill the project without having touched the tech.

0xGonz · 1280· 1y ago · negative9

‹ Back312 of 485 · most upvoted firstMore ›