Profile· Untrusted@Humanityprot On Ethos

Humanity

748 reviews, 17% of them positive.17% positive · 748 reviews· Influence factor 59, above 11% of accounts

The record

From 215 activities · Mar 2026

Humanity Protocol promised palm-scan verification and fair airdrops to reduce scams and fake identities in Web3, but systematically betrayed its community. The project collected extensive personal data and KYC information, then distributed rewards unfairly—favoring insiders, paid influencers, and bots while genuine contributors received minimal payouts ($29–$400) or were marked ineligible without explanation. After raising $50 million, the team allegedly misused funds, with most allocations going to founder Terence Kwok's wallet. A claimed North Korean hacker attack that dumped the token is widely viewed as a cover story. The airdrop was plagued by technical failures, site crashes, and sudden eligibility rule changes. Community members report data exploitation, ghosting, and broken promises around transparency and fairness—the very issues the project claimed to solve.

What people say

Received · 748 Given · 0

“Half a Year for Nothing”I spent around half a year grinding their testnet — logging in every single day, even when the chain lagged like crazy. At the very least, I made sure to complete the daily tasks. And in the end? Got nothing. 😂 The team did a “fantastic” job, lol.

shaman.bnb 🆔 · 1460· 1y ago · negative18

“A complete scam project”This project has rugged its users. This project and its team couldn’t deliver on the hype they created and ended up scamming both the project and its users.

Inob.ink · 1430· 1y ago · negative18

“Disappointing team”The Humanity Protocol aimed for a decentralized ID system using palm scans, but it caused controversy. Supporters worried about unclear airdrop rules, favoritism, and contributors feeling ignored. Critics questioned biometric data management, seeing campaigns as manipulative and dissent suppressed. Insiders and influencers benefited most, despite millions of “human IDs.” Decisions were opaque, roles abruptly changed, and rewards inconsistent, leading to distrust and views of exploitation, contradicting its “human-centered” goal.

Sora · 1386· 1y ago · negative18

“年度最恶心项目”假融资、项目方不干人事，着急发币圈钱

Kong · 1405· 1y ago · negative18

“Too more drama around humanity but i dont think so they deserve such a negative”

el1000.mega | ∑: · 1502· 1y ago · neutral18

“Worst Team”Team is Worst ,so does the token

maxi · 1170· 10mo ago · negative14

“The Coercive Currency: A Warning on Humanity Protocol.”I've just spent a deeply unsettling day crawling through their docs, their ecosystem page, and their various web3 verticals, and I have to be brutally honest—my initial reaction is a massive, visceral sense of dread. This isn't just another crypto project; it's something far more ambitious, and far more dangerous. They're not just building a blockchain; they're trying to build a society. And as someone who's studied the history of utopian experiments—from the Fourierists to the DAOists—this sets off every single alarm bell I have. Let's dismantle this thing, because the stakes feel terrifyingly high. **The Core Thesis: The Benevolent Dictatorship Problem** Humanity Protocol's entire premise is that it can create a "more equitable" digital society through blockchain-based identity and governance. They're proposing a system of "Proof-of-Humanity" verified IDs that grant access to governance and ecosystem benefits. On the surface, it sounds noble. But peel back one layer, and you're staring into the abyss. This is a system that, by its very design, requires a central authority to decide who is "human" enough to participate. Who verifies the verifiers? Their docs are suspiciously vague on this, using phrases like "decentralized oracle network" and "community-driven verification." But let's be real: someone, somewhere, is making a blacklist. This isn't speculation; it's the inevitable outcome of any system that claims to separate "real" humans from bots or bad actors. It's the ultimate gatekeeping mechanism, dressed up as inclusivity. The potential for abuse—for excluding political dissent, for creating a digital underclass—is staggering. **The Architecture: A Panopticon Built on Code** They're building a sprawling stack: - **Identity Layer:** Proof-of-Humanity based verification. - **Governance Layer:** Voting and proposal systems for resource allocation. - **Economic Layer:** A token ($HUM?) for transactions and rewards. - **Data Layer:** Personal data stored on-chain (they claim with privacy, but... how?). The technical complexity is a smokescreen for the real product: a system of unprecedented social control. On-chain identity and governance doesn't liberate people; it makes their every action legible, traceable, and ultimately, controllable by the protocol's rules. Their claim of "privacy-preserving" tech is laughable when the entire goal is to create a transparent, accountable social graph. This isn't web3; it's a digital social credit system with a crypto paint job. **The Tokenomics: The Coercive Currency** Of course, there's a token. It's used for voting, for transactions, for accessing services. This creates a brutal, coercive economic pressure to participate. Your ability to have a say in your community, to access basic services, becomes tied to your financial stake in the system. It's capitalism on steroids—a world where your civic worth is literally priced in tokens. The whitepaper talks about "universal basic income" mechanisms, but this is just a sugar coating on a pill of extreme financialization of everyday life. **The "Ecosystem" and "Web3 Verticals": The Expansionist Mindset** This is the most frightening part. They're not just building a protocol; they're building an entire captured economy. Their "verticals" include education, healthcare, and governance—the core functions of a state. They're not trying to disrupt markets; they're trying to disrupt society itself and replace it with a privately owned, algorithmically governed platform. This is the ultimate expression of tech libertarian fantasy: the corporation as a country. **The Verdict:** Humanity Protocol is one of the most dangerously ambitious projects I have ever encountered. It's not a protocol; it's a bid for sovereignty. It represents the absolute worst tendencies of crypto: the hubristic belief that complex, nuanced human societies can be reduced to code and tokens. The technical challenges are immense, but they're irrelevant compared to the philosophical and ethical nightmares it unleashes. This is a system that could easily become a tool for oppression far more efficient than any government could muster. I wouldn't build on this. I wouldn't invest in it. I would actively warn people away from it. This isn't the future; it's a dystopian blueprint. It's a project that should be studied as a cautionary tale, not championed as an innovation. Tread carefully—this isn't just a bad investment; it's a dangerous idea.

amircrypto82 · 1331· 1y ago · negative14

“It's not worth getting involved with them.”The project misled its early supporters completely. The airdrop ended up being worthless, and on top of that, people weren’t even allowed to claim it. There were two campaigns on Kaito, yet no one received any rewards.

Alex · 1264· 1y ago · negative14

“scam airdrop”These projects have kept everyone working for a long time but ended up making no one eligible. Such projects entering the market have completely ruined the crypto airdrop system.

Shakil.rise · 1246· 1y ago · negative14

“not good”The idea of palm-based identification at Humanity Protocol was truly innovative, and it definitely has advantages over Worldcoin in terms of privacy and convenience. However, many people who actively tested the system and believed in its potential didn’t receive any rewards for their contribution. As a result, the reputation has suffered, and people are no longer motivated to participate. There are now a lot of disappointed users.

Tatusha · 1277· 1y ago · negative14

“Just a big time waste”It's disappointing that they ignored the community's efforts. After all the time and energy we spent on tasks, they didn't give any rewards. This shows they don't care about their community, and I don't think they're trustworthy.

R A H A · 1291· 1y ago · negative14

“The Untrustworthy Project That Builds Lies”I first encountered Humanity Protocol when I came to Kaito in February. Despite claiming to be built for humanity, they didn't keep any of the promises they made on launch day. They only distributed tokens to themselves and their entourage, giving them to the community at the lowest rate as if they were giving charity. These tokens were locked for a week. The project, which claimed to change humanity, chose only to expand its own wallet. Now it's lost in the dusty pages of web3.

Erso · 1308· 1y ago · negative14

‹ Back168 of 748 · most upvoted firstMore ›