Profile· Untrusted@Humanityprot On Ethos

Humanity

748 reviews, 17% of them positive.17% positive · 748 reviews· Influence factor 59, above 11% of accounts

The record

From 215 activities · Mar 2026

Humanity Protocol promised palm-scan verification and fair airdrops to reduce scams and fake identities in Web3, but systematically betrayed its community. The project collected extensive personal data and KYC information, then distributed rewards unfairly—favoring insiders, paid influencers, and bots while genuine contributors received minimal payouts ($29–$400) or were marked ineligible without explanation. After raising $50 million, the team allegedly misused funds, with most allocations going to founder Terence Kwok's wallet. A claimed North Korean hacker attack that dumped the token is widely viewed as a cover story. The airdrop was plagued by technical failures, site crashes, and sudden eligibility rule changes. Community members report data exploitation, ghosting, and broken promises around transparency and fairness—the very issues the project claimed to solve.

What people say

Received · 748 Given · 0

“Extremely Scam Fair drop”Many community friends are active in their discords but only get their wisdom, they don't get the appropriate one. They did not meet the requirements of Airdrop despite carrying out all the missions and there were tasks that took fees.

adrapier · 1310· 1y ago · negative13

“Humanity Protocol's Bold Vision: Palm Scans and $H Tokens Face Airdrop Hiccups”@Humanityprot, led by @TK_Humanity, is pushing a cool blockchain idea to verify real people online using palm scans, fighting AI fakes. Lots of folks on X are hyped about it, but there’s some grumbling too. People say the airdrop was a mess—confusing rules and slow payouts annoyed many. Some feel the team’s not open enough about their plans or how the $H token works. There’s also worry about whether the palm scan tech will catch on or if it’s too invasive. Still, fans believe in the project’s big potential to make the internet more human. If the team can tighten up their game and talk clearer, they could win over the doubters.

VECNA · 1250· 1y ago · negative13

“rug”2 team members had be called out for multiple scam in the past. so not surprise by this recent scam this project pulled and stole people data

Chi_M_Man. KGeN. · 1284· 1y ago · negative13

“Participated early, but the airdrop was disappointing. Lack of transparency around data use is the major concern”

tommy · 1287· 1y ago · negative13

“Dissapointed”Many users, including myself, felt misinformed and alienated because there appeared to be a lack of transparency regarding project updates and community involvement. All things considered, I think Humanity Protocol requires major enhancements to its communication and functionality in order to successfully realize its goal.

Erikanggg · 1260· 1y ago · negative13

“Where do they go from here?”Just following the stories. Where does Humanity Protocol go from here? Is this the first protocol to get slashed on Ethos? So many negative reviews on the Humanity Protocol. Sounds like people are upset because of lack of rewards. But how is the protocol itself?

monivong 🦇🔊 · 1225· 1y ago · neutral13

“背刺社区的诈骗项目”human的很多大使以及社区成员，兢兢业业的建设了社区很久，但是最后很多成员都没有收到任何空投，项目方把他们统统视为了女巫。该项目还套皮了某门禁厂商的代码，收集了许多个人信息危害极大。

加密小猫 (✱,✱)丨Crypto · 1234· 1y ago · negative13

“畜生项目，违背社区”做了kyc，结果女巫，你他妈给脸了？

Oxye漆华 · 1245· 1y ago · negative13

“这个项目除了一个签到网站，还做了什么？？？感觉就是第一个骗子”

福利鸭 · 1261· 1y ago · negative13

“The shame of web3”Humanity Protocol has drawn significant criticism for its questionable practices, casting doubt on its legitimacy and fairness. One major concern is the project's financing, which has raised red flags due to its rapid fundraising at a $1 billion valuation, backed by prominent investors like Kingsway Capital and Animoca Brands. Industry observers suspect potential misrepresentation in its valuation, with a lack of transparent financial disclosures fueling speculation of inflated figures or market manipulation to lure investors. The absence of clear evidence supporting such a lofty valuation raises concerns about the project's credibility and whether it has misled stakeholders about its financial health.Further tarnishing its reputation, Humanity Protocol has been accused of deceiving both investors and users regarding its technological capabilities. Critics have pointed to similarities between its technology and that of a Shenzhen-based access control manufacturer, suggesting the project may be a superficial rebrand rather than an innovative blockchain solution. Allegations of "tech-washing" have emerged, with claims that the team exaggerated its technological advancements to secure funding and user trust, undermining confidence in its promised "humanity proof" system.The project's "Fairdrop" airdrop has been a particular point of contention, widely criticized for its lack of fairness and transparency. Marketed as an equitable distribution based on community contributions, the airdrop has instead been slammed as grossly unfair. Dedicated community members, including those with significant engagement, reportedly received negligible token allocations—sometimes worth as little as $1—or were excluded entirely. Meanwhile, obscure or inactive "ghost addresses" allegedly received tens of thousands of tokens, prompting accusations of insider manipulation. The opaque allocation criteria and lack of clear communication have led many to believe the project team prioritized personal gain over community fairness, further eroding trust. This mishandling of the airdrop, combined with broader concerns about fraud and misrepresentation, has left Humanity Protocol facing intense scrutiny and a damaged reputation within the crypto community.

MacBook Pro · 1281· 1y ago · negative16

“Terrible Project”I wasted my time on this project. doing daily checkings for over 6 months only to not be eligible.

Victor.hl · 1396· 1y ago · negative16

“"Let down by a project meant to be “Human””I was excited about Humanity Protocol from the beginning. It sounded like it could change how identity works in Web3. But in the end, it didn’t feel human at all. The team took personal data without clear explanations, ran a messy airdrop that mostly rewarded insiders, and ignored the people who really supported the project. Mods, ambassadors, and active members who worked for months were just left out. We did everything asked missions, events, roles and got nothing back. Instead of fairness and openness, it felt like the opposite. Big disappointment.

shegy · 1342· 1y ago · negative16

‹ Back204 of 748 · most upvoted firstMore ›