MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓352Abhi | AP Collective @ Token 2049 🇸🇬↓281aadvark↓263TradeAnton Boiarchuk↑2.5%vitalik.eth↑5.8%Biti8↑3.2%Cuzzo 🛡️↓4.2%VouchesMLO990 WHUF → Serpin TaxtMLO496 WHUF → CirrusMLO100 WHUF → Phoenix 🐦‍🔥MLO100 WHUF → OSFReviewsjeff.hlpositive · 84 upvotesDegen Ape Traderpositive · 58 upvotesCoinbase Ventures 🛡️positive · 55 upvotesgabriel shapiropositive · 54 upvotes
Profile· Untrusted@HumanityprotOn Ethos
Humanity

Humanity

748 reviews, 17% of them positive.17% positive · 748 reviews· Influence factor 59, above 11% of accounts

The record

From 215 activities · Mar 2026

Humanity Protocol promised palm-scan verification and fair airdrops to reduce scams and fake identities in Web3, but systematically betrayed its community. The project collected extensive personal data and KYC information, then distributed rewards unfairly—favoring insiders, paid influencers, and bots while genuine contributors received minimal payouts ($29–$400) or were marked ineligible without explanation. After raising $50 million, the team allegedly misused funds, with most allocations going to founder Terence Kwok's wallet. A claimed North Korean hacker attack that dumped the token is widely viewed as a cover story. The airdrop was plagued by technical failures, site crashes, and sudden eligibility rule changes. Community members report data exploitation, ghosting, and broken promises around transparency and fairness—the very issues the project claimed to solve.

What people say

Received · 748Given · 0
“Scam project”After a long wait, Humanity Protocol truly let us down. Their promises of transparency and fairness were never fulfilled, and everything ended up benefiting a select few. The community that was built through real effort was ignored, and users’ hard work meant nothing. In the end, this project only exploited our trust and data to promote itself.CryptoGuy 👊🐰.DIME · 1340· 12mo ago · negative14
“Team rugged?”There’s very little transparency in their decisión making, which is a shame because the protocol seemed really promising. But actions often speak louder than wordsPunktastik · 1210· 1y ago · neutral14
“Scam”The team created the project for rugUngSpirit.md · 1321· 1y ago · negative14
“scam project”i never touched this project because it looked sus, they did a shitty airdrop and ignored community by gaming the system with airdrop yappers, they named it humanity protocol but insult humans, didn't reward early supporters who were there for them from the beginning.S0upy.exe 🐸♱ · 1313· 1y ago · negative14
“Super creepy project who wants to record your hand for 2FA. Actually a very anti-crypto ethos if you think about it.”Web3Tr8der · 1263· 1y ago · negative14
“Built to protect, but Humanity Protocol failed its own community”I believed in Humanity Protocol’s vision to fight scams and fake identities in Web3 through human verification. But the project collected personal data under vague promises and ran an unclear, insider-favoring airdrop. Genuine supporters and contributors were sidelined, and community trust was broken. A project meant to protect users ultimately failed them.Enehezeyi |Interlink Labs T3 Ambassador · 1279· 8mo ago · negative20
“A Scam”You can see all the bad practices from this single project. Lies after lies and all the money are just extracted by the insidersPNP · 1327· 9mo ago · negative11
“They're dishonest and won't keep to their own words , empty promises and shady.”Grey 💾 · 1229· 9mo ago · negative11
“Yönetim kusuru olan proje”çalıştırdı.çalıştırdı.biz buyuz şöyleyiz böyleyiz. sonuç ortada birçok mağdur. olduğu yer belli, yanlış yer, yanlış yönetici..Ilhan Tunçkol🚢FD1H · 1268· 10mo ago · negative11
“project scam”One of those projects that attracted users with fake promises Then started doing shady stuff with KYC and other thingsvalon · 1386· 10mo ago · negative11
“Web3炒作机器，缺乏真实性和深度”社区情感负面居多，不是在构建信任，而是在制造泡沫，建议社区保持警惕，避免被这种低质推广误导。Mohamad Garg · 1169· 1y ago · negative11
“Biometric Hype Marred by Bot Inflation, Privacy Worries, and Risk of Massive Token Dump”Humanity Protocol’s promise to bring privacy-first, Sybil-resistant digital identity to Web3 is overshadowed by mounting concerns and missteps. The most damning controversy is founder Terence Kwok’s own admission: despite advertising over six to nine million “Human IDs,” up to 88% may be bots, not real people, risking the foundation of their entire anti-Sybil narrative. The overwhelming focus on airdrop incentives drove bot creation and fake accounts, calling into question the authenticity and fairness of token distribution, governance, and on-chain activity. Adding to skepticism, critics warn of major price volatility and dilution—H token experienced a dramatic 61% crash after launch, with looming supply unlocks set to flood the market and insiders likely to take early profits. The air of artificial growth and engineered hype leaves traders and contributors wary of value erosion and rug-pull risk. Meanwhile, privacy advocates raise flags over palm biometric scanning: while marketed as “less invasive” than iris scans, the system’s collection and long-term retention of biometric data triggers unease about regulatory compliance and user consent, especially if centralized parties manage the data. The phishing scams targeting users (fake Humanity Protocol websites draining wallets) are a further black mark, showing how hype and poor education expose vulnerable communities to fraud and permanent losses. In summary, Humanity Protocol’s technical vision is increasingly undermined by operational missteps, bot manipulation, price risk for new holders, and lasting privacy doubts. These negatives warrant extreme caution for anyone eyeing the protocol for identity, investment, or everyday use.taps · 1158· 1y ago · negative11
‹ Back240 of 748 · most upvoted firstMore ›