MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓351aadvark↓277Majdi↓266TradeSk0rp.eth↑48.8%Brandon scott↑1.0%vitalik.eth↑1.7%Ethos↑1.0%VouchesSyrup69 WHUF → OSFDpuck (bob)50 WHUF → freshout.ape 🍄🦍Dpuck (bob)30 WHUF → KingPickle 🪑Dpuck (bob)25 WHUF → osamafaheemm🤝Reviews一川drive 🔴positive · 77 upvotesMark Karpelèspositive · 56 upvotesaiobkhan ✨positive · 46 upvotesCryptoPasokospositive · 23 upvotes
Profile· Untrusted@HumanityprotOn Ethos
Humanity

Humanity

748 reviews, 17% of them positive.17% positive · 748 reviews· Influence factor 59, above 11% of accounts

The record

From 215 activities · Mar 2026

Humanity Protocol promised palm-scan verification and fair airdrops to reduce scams and fake identities in Web3, but systematically betrayed its community. The project collected extensive personal data and KYC information, then distributed rewards unfairly—favoring insiders, paid influencers, and bots while genuine contributors received minimal payouts ($29–$400) or were marked ineligible without explanation. After raising $50 million, the team allegedly misused funds, with most allocations going to founder Terence Kwok's wallet. A claimed North Korean hacker attack that dumped the token is widely viewed as a cover story. The airdrop was plagued by technical failures, site crashes, and sudden eligibility rule changes. Community members report data exploitation, ghosting, and broken promises around transparency and fairness—the very issues the project claimed to solve.

What people say

Received · 748Given · 0
“Not Human Centered”Personal data collected, vague rules, and an airdrop that sidelined its own community. This is not the Web3 future we were promised.0xAris!!🟨 · 1209· 1y ago · negative9
“so-called humanity”When the airdrops are done correctly, the community fires, increases the excitement and gathered everyone around a single purpose. But when it is done wrong, then the thing that emerges, almost becomes a certificate of how it is not done. Bad process management is not only a technical problem; It destroys the trust of people, turns expectation to nerve, loyalty into indifference. On top of that, it is the irony that the team is considered from this complex. So there is no bright vision in the middle, there is no inspiring leadership, but a badly managed airdrop has inflated fame with community response. And sometimes the process does not really need to say anything else, speaks enough on its own.Trader Opusa 𒆠 · 1267· 1y ago · negative9
“Dự án lừa đảo”Thứ nhất, công nghệ còn kém và mô hình kinh tế đã thất bại. Thứ hai, một số token đã được xác minh, và một số token chưa được xác minh. Lý do chính là quy tắc rất không rõ ràng. Quy tắc airdrop được chia thành năm hoặc sáu tweet và công bố trong vòng một tuần. Phát hành mã mời theo thứ tự ngược lạiCrypto Bom · 1221· 1y ago · negative9
“Cautionary Note on Humanity Protocol”Humanity Protocol presents an ambitious vision: a decentralized digital identity system powered by palm recognition and zero knowledge proofs, even securing $20million in funding and a $1.1billion valuation from firms like Pantera Capital and Jump Crypto. Despite the early promise, it has faced serious setbacks since its token launch, including a 61% price drop and internal reports that up to 88% of the claimed “Human IDs” may be bots a fundamental issue for a protocol built on proving humanity. Users have also raised complaints about being excluded from the airdrop or receiving unfair allocations, and there are concerns around centralization, lack of full audits, unclear governance, and limited transparency around tokenomics. On the trust front, several third party domains impersonating Humanity Protocol have been flagged as phishing or scam sites, increasing risk for users interacting with unofficial URLs. While the goal of fighting bots and verifying users is compelling, the combination of bot infiltration, governance questions, privacy risk, and technical ambiguity raises red flags. Until the protocol proves its accuracy and transparency, users should remain cautious.Dracarys · 1277· 1y ago · negative9
“My Concerns about Giving Humanity Protocol My Palm Scan”I’ve looked into Humanity Protocol, and honestly, I’m not feeling confident about it. The idea of using a palm scan to create a decentralized identity sounds cool, but there’s just not enough substance behind the pitch for me to trust it. Most of what I see is polished marketing, big-name investors, and broad promises, but the important details are missing. Privacy is the biggest red flag for me. They say the palm data stays on your device and is hashed, but I can’t find any independent audit or verifiable proof to back that up. If you’re asking people to hand over biometric data, you need to show real transparency, not just ask for trust. The technical side feels unclear too. I can’t find open-source code to review, no solid technical documentation, and nothing that really explains how they protect against fraud or centralization. Without that, it’s impossible to know if the system actually works the way they say it does. The roadmap doesn’t inspire confidence either. Deadlines shift, updates focus on partnerships rather than actual progress, and the tokenomics feel vague. It gives me the sense that hype is moving faster than the actual product. Until Humanity Protocol can prove it’s secure, transparent, and truly decentralized, I’m not on board. The concept is ambitious, but when you’re dealing with something as sensitive as identity, proof and trust are everything.MrJudge · 1177· 1y ago · negative9
“畜生”一句畜生形容不为过xbb · 1213· 1y ago · negative9
“Humanity Protocol has Nothing to Offer”humanity protocol took user palm scan and still didn't gave user the drop they promised closing out claim phase without any notification was disaster too . they thought if they could close the claim period without any notification token can pump which it did but now it is down the drainAchak · 1254· 1y ago · negative9
“Complete Farmers”This project farmed the community, scammed them, and took their identity.Abba 🐂🀄 · 1290· 1y ago · negative9
“Overrated”They are never care about their own communitySkye · 1222· 1y ago · negative9
“Shallow tech”For a project that raised millions of dollars to prove you're human by doing KYC and also biometrics, their tge and airdrop execution was below average.dosa ⌘ Ⓜ️Ⓜ️T · 1275· 1y ago · negative9
“They deceived the great community that supported them under all circumstances.”Scam projectpalindrome · 1305· 1y ago · negative9
“Scam project”They scammed their community, many people didn't get any rewards for their campaignYelena Gavrik · 1248· 1y ago · negative9
‹ Back348 of 748 · most upvoted firstMore ›