MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓351aadvark↓277Majdi↓266TradeSk0rp.eth↑48.8%Ethos↓1.5%Brandon scott↑1.0%vitalik.eth↑1.7%VouchesTucosalamanca150 WHUF → EthosDpuck (bob)50 WHUF → freshout.ape 🍄🦍Mazzy 🇫🇷10 WHUF → BboatBrandon scott9 WHUF → 一川drive 🔴ReviewsMark Karpelèspositive · 92 upvotesRiyonegative · 61 upvotesCryptoPasokospositive · 61 upvotesTbeagle ⨀positive · 12 upvotes
Profile· Untrusted@HumanityprotOn Ethos
Humanity

Humanity

748 reviews, 17% of them positive.17% positive · 748 reviews· Influence factor 59, above 11% of accounts

The record

From 215 activities · Mar 2026

Humanity Protocol promised palm-scan verification and fair airdrops to reduce scams and fake identities in Web3, but systematically betrayed its community. The project collected extensive personal data and KYC information, then distributed rewards unfairly—favoring insiders, paid influencers, and bots while genuine contributors received minimal payouts ($29–$400) or were marked ineligible without explanation. After raising $50 million, the team allegedly misused funds, with most allocations going to founder Terence Kwok's wallet. A claimed North Korean hacker attack that dumped the token is widely viewed as a cover story. The airdrop was plagued by technical failures, site crashes, and sudden eligibility rule changes. Community members report data exploitation, ghosting, and broken promises around transparency and fairness—the very issues the project claimed to solve.

What people say

Received · 748Given · 0
“诈骗项目”签到了1年，邀请了上百人，积分几十万，结果空投就给几u，这说的过去么。真是好笑了浊焯拙🕊️.🐬TermMax · 1278· 1y ago · negative9
“这个项目纯粹是一个骗融资骗隐私信息的老鼠仓项目，我从很早期就接触这个项目，并且参与了很早起的录制掌纹手臂各种视频的表单，项目一直没有实质性内容，只有一个官网签到功能，然后就是三天两头的社区开会，和传销没两样，最后空投阶段全部老鼠仓”王俊杰 【厚积薄发版】🐬TermMax | ETHGas ⛽ · 1331· 1y ago · negative9
“Community Aware Founder”Humanity protocol They actively engage with their community and value feedback. Instead of building in isolation, they listen, respond thoughtfully, and adjust when necessary, reinforcing trust and long term alignment.𝔻𝕖𝕖𝕟 𝕂𝕒𝕪𝕔𝕖𝕖 🎩 · 1225· 9mo ago11
“Humanity Protocol – Great Idea, Poor Delivery”Humanity Protocol talks big on decentralization and identity, but delivers more hype than substance. Its reliance on palm biometrics raises privacy red flags, and the selective onboarding feels anything but inclusive. For a project claiming to serve “all of humanity,” it’s oddly closed-off, vague, and lacking in real utility. Right now, it’s more buzzword than breakthrough.Unbothered. · 1257· 1y ago · negative11
“Humanity Protocol is Overrated”Humanity Protocol is overrated because it overpromises on solving identity verification with biometrics but fails to deliver on execution and fairness. Despite its claims of being Sybil-resistant, its recent airdrop was plagued by bots, leaving many real users unrewarded and frustrated. The lack of transparency around token distribution, absence of a clear roadmap, and missing technical documentation further raise doubts about the project's credibility. While the concept is ambitious, the current implementation falls short, making the hype feel premature and undeserved.Rapheal Edun · 1192· 1y ago · negative11
“Humanity Protocol Forgot Its Humans”Humanity Protocol completely ignored the very people who helped build its foundation. No credits. No recognition. No meaningful rewards. Testnet users? Forgotten. Early supporters? Overlooked. Yappers who spread the word and built the narrative? Ignored. The entire early community? Left behind. It’s wild how a project that preaches “decentralized identity” could so easily erase the identity of those who supported it from day one. Web3 is supposed to reward participation, not use people for traction and then ghost them. This isn’t just disappointing — it’s a red flag. A project that turns its back on its roots will never grow strong.WickX · 1323· 1y ago · negative11
“Untrustworthy”We built with them for over a year at the end of the day we ended getting cheated, this kind of project needs to be eradicate from crypto communityÇàshy®️ · 1280· 9mo ago · negative8
“not very”do not build, something usefulLumier 𓅂 · 1249· 10mo ago · negative10
“Is it same for human or just for bots? lol”a crypto project that checks if you are a real person using your hand palm, like a secret code for your phones. But it failed doing so by allowing fake bots to gets the rewards while its community went empty handedSelfmadeGojo.base.eth · 1342· 10mo ago · negative10
“Season 1 Loyalty Means Nothing Here”Been with Humanity Protocol since season 1. Did everything right - verified, earned points, stayed active. Then they converted my s1 points into a tiny amount of s2 points without any real explanation. The execution was a mess from start to finish. Site constantly crashed, couldn't load for hours. App was Android only forever - iOS dropped literally in the final hours like an afterthought. How do you run a "proof of humanity" project and exclude half the mobile users? In the end only people with massive referral networks got anything meaningful. Regular participants who actually believed in the project got dust. The whole "fairdrop" branding was a joke. Founder literally admitted most of the 9M human IDs were bots. So much for proof of humanity. Wasted months on this. Early supporters deserved better.Marselita · 1239· 11mo ago · negative10
“Challenges and Limitations”1. Adoption Barriers The success of the Humanity Protocol depends on its adoption by blockchain projects and communities. However, convincing large-scale projects to integrate the protocol might take time. 2. Technical Complexity The underlying technology, such as zero-knowledge proofs, can be complex to implement and understand. This might pose challenges for developers and users who lack technical expertise. 3. Regulatory Concerns Identity verification often intersects with legal and regulatory frameworks. Depending on how the protocol is implemented, it might attract scrutiny from regulators, particularly in regions with strict data privacy laws (e.g., GDPR). 4. Scalability Trade-offs While the protocol aims to be scalable, privacy-preserving techniques like zk-SNARKs can be computationally intensive, potentially limiting throughput or increasing costs. 5. Potential for Centralization If the protocol relies on trusted third parties (e.g., identity providers) for initial verification, it could undermine its decentralized nature and create single points of failure.cpdotsol | Token2049🇸🇬 · 1276· 1y ago · negative10
“Pioneering proof-of-humanity solutions for Web3”Discovered Humanity Protocol in December 2023 while researching Sybil resistance mechanisms. Their innovative approach to proof-of-humanity using biometric hashing without storing personal data impressed me. Unlike WorldCoin's iris scanning, their privacy-first solution felt more aligned with crypto values. Met the team at DevConnect Istanbul where they demonstrated their SDK integration. Their palm scanning technology achieving 99.9% accuracy while maintaining full anonymization was groundbreaking. Started integrating their API for our DAO voting system immediately. Recently their partnerships with major L2s for human verification, launch of $HMT token mechanics, and integration with DeFi protocols for Sybil-resistant airdrops has been game-changing. Despite the Questionable rating, Humanity Protocol is solving one of Web3's hardest problems - proving uniqueness without compromising privacy. They deserve more recognition for this critical infrastructure.SpaceWhaleX · 1120· 1y ago14
‹ Back396 of 748 · most upvoted firstMore ›