Profile· Untrusted@Humanityprot On Ethos

Humanity

748 reviews, 17% of them positive.17% positive · 748 reviews· Influence factor 59, above 11% of accounts

The record

From 215 activities · Mar 2026

Humanity Protocol promised palm-scan verification and fair airdrops to reduce scams and fake identities in Web3, but systematically betrayed its community. The project collected extensive personal data and KYC information, then distributed rewards unfairly—favoring insiders, paid influencers, and bots while genuine contributors received minimal payouts ($29–$400) or were marked ineligible without explanation. After raising $50 million, the team allegedly misused funds, with most allocations going to founder Terence Kwok's wallet. A claimed North Korean hacker attack that dumped the token is widely viewed as a cover story. The airdrop was plagued by technical failures, site crashes, and sudden eligibility rule changes. Community members report data exploitation, ghosting, and broken promises around transparency and fairness—the very issues the project claimed to solve.

What people say

Received · 748 Given · 0

“Great project but the team has more work to do.”

Chukwuduruo · 1117· 9mo ago9

“Humanity Protocol: Overhyped Failure”Humanity Protocol hyped a revolutionary privacy-first decentralized identity via palm scans and ZK proofs to fight bots and Sybil attacks. In reality, it's a buggy mess riddled with issues. The app is plagued by freezes, camera failures, and verification glitches—users report endless retries and incompatibility on common devices. Founder admitted up to 88% of users could be bots, destroying credibility in its "Proof-of-Humanity." Airdrops sparked backlash over bot infiltration and shady distributions. $H token crashed repeatedly post-airdrops (e.g., 35% drop in Dec 2025) amid sell pressure, dilution fears, and rampant scams—fake sites draining wallets. Privacy claims feel invasive with biometrics, echoing Worldcoin pitfalls. Despite $50M+ raised at unicorn valuations, it delivers frustration, losses, and doubt in true decentralized ID. Avoid this vaporware; wait for something that actually works.

gggggg.base.eth π² · 1210· 10mo ago · negative9

“警惕“掌纹骗局”！Humanity Protocol：一场精心设计的韭菜屠宰场！”别让你的掌纹成为别人的财富密码！Humanity Protocol（HP）打着“去中心化身份”的旗号，干的却是杀真实用户、养假女巫的勾当！无数人老老实实扫掌纹、做KYC、每日签到，结果呢？空投奖励全给了机器人，真用户反被贴上“女巫”标签一脚踢开！

Leon.Y小肥仔 · 1132· 1y ago · negative21

“Bad project”I genuinely don’t understand the bullish narrative surrounding this project. Just because it pitches a reward system similar to Worldcoin doesn’t mean it delivers the same level of innovation or impact. Behind the shiny branding is a lack of transparency, community trust, and real technical edge. If you’re looking for a project driven by values or actual progress, this isn’t it. Humanity Protocol is one of those projects that simply doesn’t reflect organic success. From the start, everything feels orchestrated, VC favoritism, a heavily controlled testnet, and even curated roles like “yappers” that mimic the same selective tactics seen in projects like Kaito.

dizcorvus · 1302· 1y ago · negative11

“identity for web3”I’m not very familiar with this project, but I visited their website and saw that they are working in the field of identity for Web3 projects. Their goal is to combat bots in the Web3 space using zero-knowledge technology, while also protecting user privacy. They have recently launched their own token, and overall it seems like a practical and trustworthy project.

0x417a...85B6 · 1218· 1y ago8

“Clear Red Flag Project”The airdrop process felt unfair and poorly handled, leaving many community members frustrated. Expectations were set high, but the execution didn’t reflect transparency or respect for participants. The sudden and unreasonable drop afterward only added to the disappointment and raised serious trust issues. Overall, this project shows multiple red flags, from distribution to communication. Not something I would consider reliable or community-focused. Caution is strongly advised.

Jodz · 1265· 9mo ago · negative3

“The Lost project”they were donkey built nothing just hype and disappeared lol

0x281f...d600 · 1203· 12mo ago · negative11

“Humanity Protocol's Betrayal of Real Users”I jumped into Humanity Protocol (@Humanityprot) early, grinding through their testnet tasks, palm scans, and endless referrals because their pitch on "Proof of Humanity" and "Fairdrops" sounded revolutionary. Palm verification to stop bots? A human-centric blockchain to fix Web3's mess? Sold. I racked up over 50k points, shared the love with friends, and genuinely believed this was the future of equitable crypto rewards. Boy, was I wrong. The airdrop distribution hit like a gut punch – utterly unfair, non-transparent, and rigged to favor insiders and whales. Despite their lofty claims of "no more bots draining your airdrops" and "tokens reach verified humans only," the reality? Early supporters like me got dust: a pathetic 800-900 $H tokens for months of effort. Meanwhile, rumors swirl of massive allocations (tens of thousands) dumped on a single community manager tied to shady marketing for other scam projects.

Cryptozero · 1297· 12mo ago · negative10

“Broken Promises, Broken Trust”I followed Humanity Protocol for months, thinking it was about building a people-first Web3. But what happened proved the opposite. The so-called “fairdrop” was anything but fair real contributors, mods, and builders who gave their time and energy got nothing, while randoms and influencers walked away with bags. No transparency, no respect, no accountability. The process felt like a backstab: KYC, endless community tasks, all just to be discarded in the end. For many, it wasn’t just a failed drop it was a loss of trust. If a project treats its own community like this, what hope does it have of building something real?

ANYA MISAAKI · 1283· 1y ago · negative10

“From a Grand Idea to a Massive Disappointment”I first came across information about this project on Twitter, but for some reason, I didn't pay it much attention. Then, an acquaintance invited me to their Discord server. I studied their documentation and learned about their plans, and everything looked absolutely insane on paper. For several months after that, I wrote about the project, earned the highest roles, and tested the application. Everything was pointing toward a logical product launch and integration into real-life sectors. But then, the project simply decided to launch because the market was positive. They completely abandoned their entire community and essentially doomed the project. They also didn't distribute the rewards for the Kaito leaderboard. In short, they just exited so the team could make a profit.

olexus · 1306· 1y ago · negative10

“SCAM ALERT”This project fully rugged after all of works we did on it. don't trust them anymore.

Asra ♠️ · 1267· 1y ago · negative10

“Boşa Geçen Zaman”Sadece kendi ceplerini doldurdular. Görevleri yaptık, karşılığında bir hiç aldık. Güvenilmezler ve scamlar.

Yiğit · 1314· 1y ago · negative10

‹ Back528 of 748 · most upvoted firstMore ›