MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓351aadvark↓288Majdi↓264Tradeclioagent.eth↑64.8%jesse.base.eth↑30.2%Sk0rp.eth↑15.3%BlindSquirrel↑7.8%VouchesCorey0001 📉 📈10 WHUF → ChescoCristian P.5 WHUF → chosta.ethSamZ5 WHUF → SafZ🫎 Scaply .ink .sand3 WHUF → AndrewDReviewsWildcallnegative · 58 upvotesShuyao Kongnegative · 58 upvotessibzbnegative · 39 upvoteschosta.ethpositive · 28 upvotes
Profile· Untrusted@HumanityprotOn Ethos
Humanity

Humanity

748 reviews, 17% of them positive.17% positive · 748 reviews· Influence factor 59, above 11% of accounts

The record

From 215 activities · Mar 2026

Humanity Protocol promised palm-scan verification and fair airdrops to reduce scams and fake identities in Web3, but systematically betrayed its community. The project collected extensive personal data and KYC information, then distributed rewards unfairly—favoring insiders, paid influencers, and bots while genuine contributors received minimal payouts ($29–$400) or were marked ineligible without explanation. After raising $50 million, the team allegedly misused funds, with most allocations going to founder Terence Kwok's wallet. A claimed North Korean hacker attack that dumped the token is widely viewed as a cover story. The airdrop was plagued by technical failures, site crashes, and sudden eligibility rule changes. Community members report data exploitation, ghosting, and broken promises around transparency and fairness—the very issues the project claimed to solve.

What people say

Received · 748Given · 0
“bad project”humanity protocol is the worst project ever in web3Aku 🥷🏽 · 1206· 1y ago5
“Future of KYC”Super interesting project that will bring crazy innovation in the next few months. Now they have come out with the app where you can verify your account, proving you are human, using the palm of your hand. Imagine in the next few years, where kyc will no longer need to scan documents or stupid selfies, but it will be enough to scan your palm, thus remaining anonymous.Andrea Falcon · 1338· 1y ago8
“Broken Trust”They promised fairness and transparency, but rewarded insiders while ignoring true contributors. Trust once lost is hard to regain.Zyntrixt · 1063· 1y ago · negative9
“Nice rug”“I thought it was good, but a lot of people lost money—it feels like a $5 community rug pull. What a shame. That’s why many don’t farm anymore: they can’t do things properly and just follow the community blindly.”MONster · 1350· 1y ago · negative9
“A Project That Lost Its Own Direction”Humanity Protocol entered the space with big statements about fairness, transparency, and a community-driven identity system. However, the way the project handled communication, eligibility, and reward decisions created more doubt than trust. The messaging sounded ambitious, but the execution showed a lack of consistency and clarity. The reward distribution became one of the clearest examples of this mismatch. Criteria were never fully explained, contributors across multiple roles were confused by the outcomes, and the project did not provide transparent reasoning behind who was recognized and why. For a system focused on identity and verification, unclear standards raise serious concerns. Another major issue is the overall absence of clear communication during critical moments. When a project works with sensitive data and asks users to trust its long term vision, the expectation is open dialogue and predictable processes. Instead, the community was left guessing about decisions that should have been addressed directly. Humanity Protocol presented itself as a human centered initiative, yet the experience surrounding it felt anything but.Borsch · 1371· 11mo ago · negative5
“humantiy”Legendary is a tier 1 genuine guy who'm I've had the pleasure of knowing for several years and more recently involved in the Modern Market. Numerous trust tractions OTC with no concerns. Genuine and highly reputable.𝔴𝔞𝔰𝔢 𝔬𝔫𝔢® ✨ · 1196· 1y ago6
“Identity Protocol Hits Beware Mode”Humanity Protocol tried to solve Web3 identity with ZK tech - but fans called it out for weird glitches and wallet-drainer vibes. Some users even flagged a fake airdrop site that stole funds. Not cool.ke3f · 1423· 1y ago · negative9
“毫无底线的诈骗项目！”抛弃了所有非项目方的用户和工作人员，绝大部分签到1年的社区成员没有分配，mod和大使也都是低保或者0分配。 代币经济学说为社区分配12亿代币，实际可能只有120万。 拿着做隐私、抗女巫的名号大肆收集用户信息，tge分配只分配给老鼠仓和机器人，真实用户没有分配。 纯纯畜生项目，擦亮眼睛规避创始人、团队成员以及投资机构！Jeansonlau | 叮叮叮叮 🤡 · 1320· 1y ago · negative8
“Fake Promises and a Dubious Team”Humanity Protocol positioned itself as a solution for reducing scams and fake identities in crypto by using palm scanning and other verification methods. On paper, it promised to bring trust and accountability to the ecosystem. In practice, however, the project failed to deliver on those claims. Reports from the community indicate mismanagement and a lack of transparency, leaving users feeling misled. Rather than building security and credibility, the team’s actions undermined confidence, turning what was meant to be a safeguard into another cautionary tale in crypto. For participants, this serves as a stark reminder: innovative ideas require not just technical ambition, but honest execution and a trustworthy team. Projects that prioritize hype over integrity often leave their supporters at risk.69. degen.eth · 1184· 8mo ago · negative9
“Worst”Have tried testnet for over a year, prove as human, but still not getting allocation0xKon666 · 1093· 1y ago · negative5
“Palms?”Sorry, in an era where AIs can create reality-passing faces and IDs, palm scans won't suffice as biometrics. Also too late to the DID game vs World or Self.TOM · 1422· 1y ago · negative5
“Unfair Airdrop Distribution”I participated in the Humanity Protocol testnet and completed all the required tasks correctly, but I did not receive any airdrop. This feels unfair to early testers who invested time and effort in supporting the project. Transparency and fair reward distribution are crucial for building trust in Web3, and Humanity Protocol failed to meet that expectationcryptohit.base.eth | 🎒 · 1294· 1y ago · negative8
‹ Back600 of 748 · most upvoted firstMore ›