Profile· Untrusted@Humanityprot On Ethos

Humanity

748 reviews, 17% of them positive.17% positive · 748 reviews· Influence factor 59, above 11% of accounts

The record

From 215 activities · Mar 2026

Humanity Protocol promised palm-scan verification and fair airdrops to reduce scams and fake identities in Web3, but systematically betrayed its community. The project collected extensive personal data and KYC information, then distributed rewards unfairly—favoring insiders, paid influencers, and bots while genuine contributors received minimal payouts ($29–$400) or were marked ineligible without explanation. After raising $50 million, the team allegedly misused funds, with most allocations going to founder Terence Kwok's wallet. A claimed North Korean hacker attack that dumped the token is widely viewed as a cover story. The airdrop was plagued by technical failures, site crashes, and sudden eligibility rule changes. Community members report data exploitation, ghosting, and broken promises around transparency and fairness—the very issues the project claimed to solve.

What people say

Received · 748 Given · 0

“Not happy”Not happy with execution, not happy with the team. After months of checking in and doing all task, verifying kyc only not to be eligible, so I'm not happy.

SPETOO🗿 · 1249· 1y ago · negative4

“骗局”Humanity 项目的乌托邦愿景令人向往，但实际操作却令人失望。早期参与者感受到被背刺，项目方单方面修改规则、区别对待新老用户，且缺乏有效沟通。更令人担忧的是，项目过度收集公民信息，用途不明，安全风险高，引发了对隐私泄露和滥用的担忧。如果 Humanity 不能正视并解决这些问题，恐将沦为一场空想骗局。

妖精爱尾巴 · 1145· 1y ago · negative6

“Disappointment”As a blockchain-based project promising "proof of humanity" through decentralized identity verification, Humanity Protocol positioned itself as a revolutionary solution to combat bots, Sybil attacks, and fake accounts in Web3. Founded on ideals of fairness, privacy, and community empowerment, it initially garnered excitement with its palm-scan verification tech and ambitious airdrop campaigns. However, beneath this veneer of innovation lies a troubling pattern of ethical lapses that have systematically deceived and disappointed its community, eroding trust and exposing the project as profoundly unreliable. This review dissects how Humanity Protocol has failed on multiple fronts, drawing from widespread user complaints, transparency failures, and associated scams that have left participants feeling exploited.Deception Through False Promises and Bot-Riddled AirdropsAt the heart of Humanity Protocol's ethical shortcomings is its handling of airdrops, which were marketed as fair distributions rewarding genuine human participants. The project claimed to use advanced biometrics to distinguish real users from bots, ensuring equitable rewards. Yet, in practice, this system spectacularly failed. Numerous reports highlight how bots infiltrated the process, siphoning rewards meant for legitimate community members who invested time and effort in verification tasks. This not only undermined the project's core "proof of humanity" ethos but also created a sense of betrayal among users who followed protocols diligently—completing KYC-like verifications and accumulating points—only to receive dust allocations or nothing at all. Community members on platforms like X (formerly Twitter) have voiced outrage, labeling it an "open scam" where hype was built on unfulfilled promises, leaving farmers with worthless points after months of engagement. This deception extends to misleading marketing. Humanity Protocol hyped events like ETHCC appearances and partnerships to rebuild credibility, but these efforts often felt like smoke screens. Users reported feeling manipulated into providing personal data—such as biometric scans and passports—under the guise of secure verification, only for suspicions to arise that this data could be exploited or sold for AI databases. Such practices not only violate basic ethical standards of data privacy but also exploit the trust of a community eager for Web3 innovation, turning what should be a human-centric protocol into a potential vector for identity theft.Widespread Disappointment and Community ExploitationThe fallout from these issues has been profound disappointment, with many users unfollowing the project en masse and warning others to steer clear. Projects like Humanity Protocol thrive on community labor—yapping, staking, and promoting to build hype—yet repay this with allocations that favor insiders or bots, ignoring the "hard work, emotion, and trust" invested by everyday participants. This has led to a broader erosion of faith in similar protocols, with comparisons to other "trash" projects like LayerEdge or Blum, where communities feel used as mere liquidity providers before being rug-pulled or ghosted. Ethically, this amounts to exploitation: luring users with visions of fairness while delivering inequality. Token unlocks and listings have further fueled discontent, with prices tanking post-TGE (Token Generation Event) amid accusations of poor distribution and insider favoritism. The project's rebranding to Billions Network amid these scandals only amplified perceptions of evasion, as users questioned whether it was an attempt to distance itself from the Humanity Protocol mess without addressing root issues. Unreliability Amplified by Scams and Lack of AccountabilityHumanity Protocol's unreliability is compounded by its association with rampant scams. Fake websites mimicking the official site (e.g., humanity-protocol.live) have tricked users into connecting wallets, leading to drained funds. While the project disavows these, critics argue that inadequate security measures and hype-driven marketing made such impersonations inevitable. Binance Square posts even called for delisting the token, citing it as a "scam project" that "tricks KYC" and causes losses for buyers. Accountability is glaringly absent. Despite community outcry evident in X threads accusing the team of betrayal and urging protests—the project has offered minimal transparency or remedies. This pattern of ignoring feedback while continuing to solicit engagement (e.g., via Kaito AI campaigns) reeks of opportunism, prioritizing short-term gains over long-term ethics. As one user noted, if platforms like Kaito don't vet such projects, the entire meta of community-driven Web3 could collapse under repeated disappointments. In summary, Humanity Protocol exemplifies the dark side of Web3: a project that preaches humanity but practices deception. By failing to deliver on promises, exploiting user data and labor, and allowing scams to flourish unchecked, it has not only disappointed its community but shattered trust in decentralized identity solutions. Potential participants should approach with extreme caution or better yet, avoid it altogether. True ethical protocols build with integrity; Humanity Protocol has proven it builds on sand.

Gem Detector · 1213· 1y ago · negative5

“Biometric Privacy Red Flag — Tens of Millions of Records”Humanity Protocol has already been deployed for a number of biometrics. This is to the scale of 8 million human IDs, and Phase 2 of palm scanning is a live operation. Again, biometric overreach. These templates are forever; never saw clear-set policies on deletion unless the one who gave the biometrics is consenting to its use. Unless they steer this one toward maximum clarity in privacy transparency and control of the individual over their biometrics, I'm out of dagger entrance in this business.

Lucifer2000 · 1294· 1y ago · negative5

“In between”There's a sense of stagnation, where things are moving, but not really going anywhere. There's also a feeling of uncertainty, and a few of the expected positive outcomes haven't come to fruition.

0xd15C...751c · 1208· 1y ago4

“Humanity Protocol Could Be the Missing Link Between Identity and Web3”In an era where AI-generated content and bots are everywhere, Humanity Protocol steps in with a much-needed solution. At its core, it aims to tackle one of the most fundamental issues in the crypto space—verifying that someone is a real, unique human without compromising their privacy. That’s a big deal. What makes Humanity Protocol particularly interesting is its use of biometric palm scanning, developed in partnership with the co-founder of Polygon, Sandeep Nailwal. This isn’t just another identity startup promising decentralized verification. It actually uses zero-knowledge proofs to confirm your identity without storing or exposing your biometric data. That means you can prove you’re human without giving up control of your information. It's privacy-first, which is rare in both identity and crypto. The “proof of humanity” concept isn't new, but this team seems to be getting a lot right. Unlike Worldcoin, which stirred up privacy concerns with iris scanning, Humanity Protocol feels more thoughtful in execution. The palm scan happens locally on your device, not on a centralized server, and nothing gets stored without your consent. That’s a massive improvement from the trust models we’ve seen before.

salim · 1421· 1y ago6

“Humanity Protocol is a scam project”I regret scanning my palms

Stephen Ahmeed · 1342· 1y ago · negative6

“Humanity protocol”"Absolutely inspiring to follow @Humanityprot on X! Their vision for a human-centric blockchain is a game-changer, prioritizing privacy, inclusivity, and self-sovereign identity through innovative Proof of Humanity technology. the best they do is giving everyone the opportunity to farm and earn rewards, And I always crave for this opportunity to show how excited I am to be part of this gem.

Achionye Precious · 1151· 1y ago5

“Promised to be about people, but forgot about people”The idea was strong — to rethink digital identity and put humans at the center of Web3. But in practice, the team collected personal data under vague promises, ran a confusing airdrop campaign, and mainly rewarded insiders, stakers, and influencers. Months of work by moderators, ambassadors, and early supporters were ignored. Even the promised 12% allocation for the community feels like an empty slogan. A project that was supposed to stand for transparency and people has instead become an example of opacity and lost trust.

Chase · 1212· 1y ago · neutral3

“A PROTOCOL THAT ADDRESSES REAL LIFE CHALLENGES IN WEB3”Humanity Protocol is a pioneering effort to redefine digital identity with privacy, security, and human-centric values at its core. Backed by major investors and strategic partners, it has the potential to onboard millions to Web3 while addressing real-world challenges like fraud and data privacy. However, its success depends on overcoming logistical hurdles, building user trust, and delivering on its ambitious vision.

Engrfarmer.eth (❖,❖) · 1275· 1y ago3

“Nothing about this is "humane"”Forcing users to KYC in return for tokens and then locking the tokens up for months. After that, pumping the token for weeks and then causing this dump because they got "hacked" Unbelievable to have so many bad actors in this space

Jack · 1422· 4mo ago · negative5

“great”Humanity Protocol is the Web3 identity revolution we’ve been waiting for! It’s tackling a real problem—bots screwing up DeFi, DAOs, and social platforms—with a privacy-first, human-centric fix. The palm-scan tech is easier than Worldcoin’s orb-staring, and ZKPs make it a privacy champ. Upcoming mainnet rollout and partnerships (Polygon, anyone?) could push $H to $0.10+ if they squash the bot drama and fix the app. Regulatory hurdles (like GDPR) are a watch-out, but the vision of enabling human ownership is pure gold. You’re not just a wallet address—you’re a verified human, ready to own Web3!Final Score: 7/10 Humanity Protocol is a bold, exciting step toward a bot-free, human-owned Web3. The PoH system and SSI are , but launch hiccups and app bugs keep it from a perfect score. If they nail the UX and rebuild trust, this could be a 9/10 by 2026. HODL $H if you believe in the human layer—DYOR, but this one’s got heart!

scratch · 1248· 1y ago3

‹ Back636 of 748 · most upvoted firstMore ›