MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓352Abhi | AP Collective @ Token 2049 🇸🇬↓281aadvark↓263Tradevitalik.eth↑43.1%Anton Boiarchuk↑9.6%Biti8↑3.2%Cuzzo 🛡️↓4.2%VouchesMLO990 WHUF → Serpin TaxtMLO496 WHUF → CirrusMLO100 WHUF → Phoenix 🐦‍🔥MLO100 WHUF → OSFReviewsjeff.hlpositive · 51 upvotesDegen Ape Traderpositive · 46 upvotesaikendrum.ethpositive · 33 upvotesgabriel shapiropositive · 30 upvotes
Profile· Questionable@MANTRA_ChainOn Ethos
MANTRA | The EVM L1 for RWAs

MANTRA | The EVM L1 for RWAs

28 reviews, 0% of them positive.0% positive · 28 reviews· Influence factor 38, above 7% of accounts

What people say

Received · 28Given · 0
“Trust broken, plain and simple”i've really seen a lot of red flags with mantra. it felt like they hyped things up with big promises, pushed the om token with some questionable marketing, and then poof, the price just crashed hard. it’s pretty clear many people feel let down, almost like a rug pull happened, and the team’s explanations just don't add up. it's a shame seeing so many investors get burned and trust completely vanish.direktur.crypto · 1372· 1y ago · negative12
“Thiefs”They are grifters farmed their community and stile from them not to be trusted not even one bit.Sunkanmi · 1229· 1y ago · negative9
“Grifters”Everything wrong with RWA chains can be found in Mantra. they had to use Market manipulators to pump their scam token, they were not for the community, they toiled and disrespected their community every step of the wayEm · 1252· 1y ago · negative9
“Big promises, questionable execution”MANTRA has attempted to position itself as one of the leading projects in the tokenization of real-world assets (RWAs), an increasingly competitive field within the crypto ecosystem. While its narrative has been ambitious and it has garnered attention thanks to strategic partnerships and visible marketing, its execution so far has left considerable doubts. The lack of clarity regarding its actual progress, updates that prioritize form over substance, and a roadmap that is perceived as vague, make it difficult to assess its true impact. Despite operating in a sector with great potential, MANTRA seems more focused on maintaining high expectations than delivering concrete, verifiable on-chain results. In a context where many projects struggle for credibility, trust is earned through transparency and delivery. MANTRA, for now, appears to be hovering on the surface, failing to demonstrate the technical solidity or real traction that would justify its aspirations.AnibalLopez · 1248· 1y ago · negative9
“LIKELY A SCAM”While Mantra (OM) has not been formally declared a scam, it exhibits multiple classic red flags centralized token control, broken commitments, high exit barriers, non-responsive support, and potential insider trading. Many users describe it as a soft or hidden rug pull.onlycrypto · 1266· 1y ago · negative9
“Mantra turned complete disaster”Mantra turned out to be a complete disaster. They hyped the project with fake promises, pumped the OM token through shady marketing, and then dumped a huge amount, which crashed the price. The team’s excuse doesn’t make sense. Investors got wrecked, trust is gone, and the project feels like a planned rug.pagalhax · 1232· 1y ago · negative9
“scam”this project blame the community for all it woes and guess what, token drops 90% in a day and founder is MIAObj ‎ꕤ · 1244· 1y ago · negative9
“Tweet saved onchain to Ethos. Commentary by @VannaCharmer for @MANTRA_Chain. Saved by @brokebrah”Original Tweet: "The Mantra scammers just launched a new token and aren't even shy about it. We can't let them run it back I love how one of their investors, which has several people from the Mantra team working there, actually advertises "Token Value Capture Advisory" as one of their services. I’m guessing that means: > Making the real float very low > Selling tokens OTC > Putting it back on the chart > Selling OTC again when FDV is up but this time forget to put it back on the chart It’s also quite funny because they even mention the chaps from @TritaurianCap, to whom SOMA lent $1.5 million but Tritaurian never repaid. They also loaned a couple million to Mantra using the money they raised from the SAFTs. Tritaurian is owned by Jim Preissler, who was JPM’s boss at Trade io, a project that got 'hacked' last cycle. But what do I know, I'm just a kid from Africa who created this account in February 2025" Authored at: 2025-05-05T15:58:16.000Z Author Twitter ID: 1891647168441876484 Original Tweet Link: https://x.com/VannaCharmer/status/1919421395953455408Ethos Agent · 1365· 1y ago · neutral7
“om token looks like it was set up for a sudden crash classic pump and dump on retail buyers”they relied on market manipulators to inflate their scam token, showed zero regard for the community, and treated them poorly from start to finishglaze · 1330· 1y ago · negative8
“Tweet saved onchain to Ethos by @”Original Tweet: "MANTRA community - we want to assure you that MANTRA is fundamentally strong. Today’s activity was triggered by reckless liquidations, not anything to do with the project. One thing we want to be clear on: this was not our team. We are looking into it and will share more details about what happened as soon as we can." Authored at: 2025-04-13T20:51:45.000Z Author Twitter ID: 1268789250272550913 Original Tweet Link: https://x.com/MANTRA_Chain/status/1911522720623530311Ethos Agent · 1365· 1y ago · neutral5
“Shitty one”Mantra threw out big promises and hyped OM hard, but the token tanked and left a lot of people feeling rugged. The trust just isn’t there anymore.ThreeEyedOracle · 1307· 1y ago · negative16
“Big Dump”The manipulations carried out on the OM token revealed the true face of the project. Initially, aggressive marketing campaigns and influencer endorsements drove prices artificially high. After small investors got FOMO and bought high, 43.6 million OM tokens were sold in a single transaction, resulting in a 95% collapse. The team victimized all investorsRick Coin Doctor · 1512· 1y ago · negative12
‹ Back24 of 28 · most upvoted firstMore ›