Someguy
Afi
Grethos
Abhi | AP Collective @ Token 2049 🇸🇬
aadvark
Anton Boiarchuk
vitalik.eth
Biti8
Cuzzo 🛡️
MLO
jeff.hl
Coinbase Ventures 🛡️
Jeetu
Degen Ape TraderProfile· Neutral@PortalcoinOn Ethos
Portal
32 reviews, 56% of them positive.56% positive · 32 reviews· Influence factor 101, above 20% of accountsWhat people say
Received · 32Given · 0“Portal 的整合计划有利于：”1/解决流动性分散、用户体验复杂、跨链交互困难等碎片化问题。 2/账户抽象优化用户体验优化。 3/为开发者提供实时分析、跨链流动性和分发工具，赋能开发者。
99｜乞丐版 · 1186· 1y ago2
99｜乞丐版 · 1186· 1y ago2“Great tech & builders”Portal is transforming the industry with innovative technology, opening up new pathways and opportunities for web3 users through their groundbreaking solutions.
🏄🏾♂️ · 1183· 1y ago2
🏄🏾♂️ · 1183· 1y ago2“Great Tek”Portal feels like the missing link Web3 didn’t know it needed. Clean interface, seamless access, and the Hyperway actually makes cross-chain feel native. If this is the future of connection, it’s moving fast—and Portal’s already there.
Wylo · 1181· 1y ago1
Wylo · 1181· 1y ago1“Portal”Portal ($PORTAL) has garnered positive sentiment for its innovative approach to bridging Web3 gaming across blockchain networks. Users praise its cross-chain platform, built on LayerZero, for connecting gamers and developers seamlessly, enhancing interoperability, and simplifying access to games via tools like Portal Passport and Portal Wallet. The project’s gamified engagement, like the Crystal Dash game, has been a hit, with over 1 million X posts driving community hype. Its Binance Launchpool debut, raising significant stakes, and a $10M presale in minutes reflect strong investor confidence. Recent product developments, like Portal Pay, further bolster its appeal for a unified gaming ecosystem.
Deborah Attah · 1012· 1y ago2
Deborah Attah · 1012· 1y ago2“A Cautionary Tale of a Flawed Crypto Venture”This project has garnered a negative reputation, primarily due to allegations of engaging in deceptive practices and token manipulation. Accused of orchestrating pump-and-dump schemes, the team is said to artificially inflate token prices before selling off their holdings, leaving investors with significant losses. Such actions undermine trust and highlight the risks of projects lacking transparency and genuine value in the cryptocurrency space
ゆうぴ · 1241· 1y ago · negative2
ゆうぴ · 1241· 1y ago · negative2
“start and end of a meta”They kicked off a meta that changed CT, similar to InfoFi in some aspects. It was basically a post-to-earn model where farmers did really well - was fun while it lasted. But I'm not sure what happened after that initial phase. Seems like they didn't communicate the project's purpose clearly enough and it failed to deliver on some fronts.
Ravenium · 1231· 1y ago1
Ravenium · 1231· 1y ago1
‹ Back32 of 32 · most upvoted first