Profile· Untrusted@Revolving_Games On Ethos

Revolving Games

120 reviews, 2% of them positive.2% positive · 120 reviews· Influence factor 54, above 11% of accounts

What people say

“"Big funding, low follow-through"”Revolving Games came out swinging — with $25M in backing from names like Pantera and Animoca, expectations were sky-high. But so far, the delivery hasn’t matched the pitch. The $RCADE token launch has faced multiple delays, eroding early community trust. Details around tokenomics remain vague, and there's been little transparency around audits or security — a red flag for any project with on-chain gameplay and in-game economies. Marketing feels surface-level, and engagement dips noticeably when things go off-script. When faced with criticism around the TGE delay, responses leaned corporate rather than community-first. It’s still early, and maybe they turn it around — but right now, it feels more like a flashy trailer than a working game.

A.E. · 1141· 1y ago · negative8

“A scam as expected”I'm pretty sure the other reviews fill up better than me due to having more details. I have participated in their airdrop etc but it was expected it was going to be a scam as it was a c/p of a different project at that time. Stay away do not trust this team.

ALPHA · 1262· 1y ago · negative8

“not confidence”Sorry, but it's a project that doesn't inspire much confidence...

Dew^reş · 1253· 1y ago · negative8

“scam”scam alert

Mutant ApeYC · 777· 1y ago · negative8

“Scam”No deliveries whatsoever, huge marketing with KOL, even some of the KOL like dingaling left them because they were unsatisfied with the lack of delivery

PaPiPuPePo · 1294· 1y ago · negative8

“Dolandırıcının Projesi”Coinhunter denen üçkağıtçının aylarca ballandıra ballandıra anlattığı ve övdüğü proje

when · 1218· 1y ago · negative11

“Projeleri tutmayan tam bir scammer proje. Fenomenlere pay verip reklamını yaptırıyor.”Fenomenlerin aylarca reklamını yaptığı projenin ta kendisidir. $RCADE token lansmanından sonra büyük eleştiriler almıştır.

solscammer · 1226· 1y ago · negative9

“A Masterclass in Eroding Community Trust”On the surface, Revolving Games has all the right ingredients: a massive $25M+ war chest, backing from top-tier VCs like Pantera and Animoca, and even the legendary Dan Houser of Rockstar Games fame attached to their name. They talk a big game about building a "decentralized gaming ecosystem" and creating "seriously fun games." Yet, beneath this glossy, well-funded exterior lies a troubling pattern of behavior that has systematically undermined its most valuable asset: its community's trust. The most glaring issue has been the repeated, last-minute delays of their Token Generation Event (TGE). Promising a launch, building hype, and then pulling the rug out from under your supporters with vague excuses about "strategic partnerships" is not just unprofessional; it's a profound sign of disrespect to the very people who have invested their time and capital. This hasn't happened just once. This pattern suggests either a fundamental lack of a coherent strategy or an inability to manage expectations and execute on a timeline. Compounding this is a communication strategy that ranges from dismissive to outright hostile. When community members voice legitimate concerns about these delays, they are often met with corporate jargon or, worse, defensive retorts from leadership. This isn't how you build a "player-powered" ecosystem; it's how you create an adversarial relationship with your earliest advocates. Finally, there's a deep strategic confusion at the heart of the project. They court the Web3 crowd with promises of decentralization and node sales—asking the community to financially power their network—while simultaneously telling the mainstream that blockchain is just a background feature. This attempt to be everything to everyone results in a product that feels authentic to no one. It creates a sense that the Web3 components are more of a fundraising vehicle than a core philosophical commitment. Potential is meaningless without execution and integrity. Revolving Games has shown a consistent deficit in both. Until they can demonstrate an ability to keep their word, communicate with transparency, and align their actions with their ambitious marketing, they remain a case study in how to alienate a community and squander immense potential.

mobin · 1222· 1y ago · negative8

“"shady"”Their are a lot of things sketchy about from founder to how they have handled things. What game are they building? nothing worth while and their token launch extremely shitty.

The doc · 1349· 1y ago · negative13

“Its all you!not me!”I’m just a regular Web3 user who was really excited about Revolving Games and their vision for games like HatchKings and the $RCADE token, backed by names like Pantera Capital. But I’m honestly disappointed with how things turned out, and I want to share my concerns, hoping you’ll support me in asking for some accountability.The $RCADE token launch on July 9, 2025, was a letdown. After multiple delays from Q1 2024, the claim site was down for three hours, and the price dropped from $0.0079 to $0.0012. They listed on Binance Alpha first, leaving regular users like me unable to claim at a fair price. @RcadeNetwork on X mentioned “site attacks” as the reason, but they didn’t provide any proof, which feels unfair.I’m not here to attack, just to express my frustration. Web3 gaming is struggling in 2025, and I hoped for better from this project. Can we push for transparency and fairness?

0xbora.ink 🧙‍♂️,🛠️ gnoma (🧙‍♂️,🧙‍♂️) | 𝔽rAI π · 1213· 1y ago · negative7

“scAMMAR”You are really bullshit bro.

Kadir Şahin · 1342· 1y ago · negative7

“People tied with real hope and emotinal with Revolving Games,they didnt meet any expactation and executed bad TGE,shame.”

yigido · 1258· 1y ago · negative7

‹ Back108 of 120 · most upvoted firstMore ›