MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓351aadvark↓277Majdi↓266TradeSk0rp.eth↑48.8%Ethos↓1.5%Brandon scott↑1.0%vitalik.eth↑1.7%VouchesTucosalamanca150 WHUF → EthosDpuck (bob)50 WHUF → freshout.ape 🍄🦍Mazzy 🇫🇷10 WHUF → BboatBrandon scott9 WHUF → 一川drive 🔴ReviewsMark Karpelèspositive · 92 upvotesRiyonegative · 61 upvotesCryptoPasokospositive · 61 upvotesTbeagle ⨀positive · 12 upvotes
Profile· Neutral@_Ehsan_96On Ethos
Ehsan | احسان

Ehsan | احسان

36 reviews, 92% of them positive.92% positive · 36 reviews· Influence factor 2, above 0% of accounts

The record

From 27 activities · Jul 2026

Ehsan is a quiet, consistent presence in Web3 known for grounded insights on emerging projects like Espresso, Aztec, and Anoma—without hype or ego. Through his Telegram channel and X, he shares practical analysis on tokenomics, airdrop farming, and early opportunities, earning trust as a long-standing community educator and project scout who prioritizes real value over narrative-chasing.

“A Long History of fraud and scam”Aramoon built a name in the Persian crypto scene by acting like a connector and project promoter, but the pattern around him tells a very different story. Over the years he has hopped from one alias to another, running groups that promise “next big thing” gains only to leave followers holding the bag. The playbook is familiar: launch a low-value NFT collection or a token (Linea has been a favorite chain) then pump it hard across Twitter and private channels. Once enough attention and liquidity show up, he and his crew sell out, leaving the community with worthless assets. When people call it out, he blocks them instantly and unleashes a small army of burner accounts to drown out criticism. Community members have tracked multiple rebrands meant to shake off past scandals. Every time a name starts to carry the stink of a rug pull, he pops up under a new handle and repeats the cycle. Some still defend him, usually because he sprinkles small rewards or early access their way, keeping a few loyal voices around to create the illusion of trust. What makes it worse is the deliberate manipulation of newcomers. His groups often present themselves as educational or alpha-sharing spaces, but the real purpose is to funnel attention toward the next pump. The technology behind the chains he targets isn’t the issue; the issue is the calculated way he uses that tech and the social hype around it to extract value. In ethos terms credibility, character, trustworthiness Aramoon has burned every bridge. The constant name-changing, the manufactured hype cycles, the silencing of critics, and the relentless pump-and-dump schemes add up to a profile that screams caution. Anyone stepping into a project he promotes should expect the same ending: big promises up front, empty bags at the finish line.on Aramoon 🇮🇷 · 1145· 1y ago · negative5
“From Visionary to Cash Grab”Big round of applause for @jasonjzhao, cofounder of @storyprotocol. He pulled off what I’d call the ultimate crypto speedrun: raise $200M, drop a token at a $5.83B FDV, promise the moon (actually, $5 trillion in assets on-chain), and then exit stage left before the curtains even opened. Bravo. https://cryptorank.io/ico/story-protocol The result? A chain so dead you’d mistake it for an abandoned testnet. Less than $10M in stables, $23 in actual fee revenue yes, twenty-three bucks, not thousand, not million. For context, I’ve probably spent more on Uber Eats this week than Story has generated in revenue. https://defillama.com/chain/story The irony is brutal. This was pitched as the future of IP, a chain for creators, a new paradigm for asset tokenization. The messaging was perfect, the narrative tight. But the second the token was launched and the market cap ballooned to fantasyland levels, Jason dipped. He didn’t even stick around for the “long game” he promised. Ghosted his own protocol like it was just another side quest. And honestly, we should’ve seen it coming. The red flags were always there: Over-the-top promises (5T assets on-chain, really?). No real traction pre-token, just hype. More energy spent on raising money than building product. Now it’s obvious this wasn’t about building. It was about extracting value, cashing out while the story (pun intended) still looked shiny. To anyone who still wants to believe: go look at the chain. Look at the numbers. This isn’t “early days.” This is what abandonment looks like. And Jason? He played the game well. He told us the story, we bought it, he left with the ending.on Jason Zhao · 1363· 1y ago · negative5
“Ethos Is What Web3 Reputation Was Missing”I discovered Ethos later than I'd like and honestly, it's my only regret. In a space that is filled with noise, short-term hype, and performative hype, Ethos is one of the few, uncensored, on-chain credibility protocols that ultimately makes reputation matter in Web3. Unlike traditional platforms where users can delete tweets, hide their history, or sway public sentiment, Ethos permanently encapsulates your work and actions into public record. For the first time, your Web3 reputation is not just your PFP and follower count, it's what other people actually think of your work, immortalously written on-chain. What is most noticeable is the lack of fluff. No one needs to flatter or follow the herd. People say the truth. Whether it is a developer, a community leader, a founder, or a DAO contributor, you read what other people have had experience with them good or bad. That does not occur often, and it is immensely valuable. Even better, Ethos does something most platforms fail at: highlighting and rewarding true quality. If you’re someone who builds, contributes, supports, or leads with integrity, Ethos becomes your proof-of-work for character. It gives visibility and credit to people who genuinely deserve it and not just those who shout the loudest. In a world where reputation is everything, yet trust is lacking, Ethos is exactly what we've been waiting for: a crypto trust layer that cannot be bought, fabricated, or erased. I only wish I'd gotten in earlier.on Ethos · 2333· 1y ago13
‹ Back96 of 97 · most upvoted firstMore ›