boom💥

19 reviews, 100% of them positive; 25 WHUF vouched for them by 1 person.100% positive · 19 reviews· 25 WHUF vouched· Influence factor 13, above 2% of accounts

The record

From 9 activities · May 2026

A skilled and generous contributor across Ethos and NeukoAI communities, known for solving complex technical problems—particularly recovering NFTs from hacked wallets—and for consistently offering help without expectation. Valued for bug-finding, thoughtful insights, attention to detail, and a reliably positive, approachable presence that strengthens the projects they engage with.

What people say

Received · 19 Given · 35

“A New Project With Credible Builders & a Rapidly Growing Community”NEUKO’s X (@neukoai) account suddenly appeared in early October, from then till today the account only follows it's founding team. It includes long-time credible builders in the space @austin_hurwitz, @greenie_sr, and @SQU1NCH who previous had roles at @Doodles. Since appearing, the project has unfolded through steady daily updates and hints, creating an ongoing “what is it?” progression rather than a traditional launch cycle. The community has played a major role from the start, actively interpreting each development and helping shape the narrative around the project. While concrete product details remain limited, the pace, consistency, and tone of communication signal that something substantive is being built. Based on the team’s track record and the way they’ve operated since NEUKO’s emergence, there’s good reason to trust their capability and intent. Overall, NEUKO is still early and intentionally understated, but the combination of a reputable team and an engaged, self-organizing community makes it a project worth paying attention to.

on NEUKO · 1259· 11mo ago17

“Creating a coin upon login because an old app version is reckless.”For context see @jackbutcher's post: https://x.com/jackbutcher/status/1949444409654947849 Basically because jack (who is an exceptional creator within our space) logged his zora account without first updating, a new token was instantly created. My opinion is that whether this was intentional or unintended is irrelevant, a project and team at this level should not allow these kinds of mistakes to happen.

on Zora · 658· 1y ago · negative14

“Really good team and product.”Always improving, excellent communication and very transparent. Sugartown is an excellent example of a web3 team executing at a high level across all aspects of business, community and product.

on Sugartown · 1599· 1y ago30

“One of the few people I completely trust in web3”Kalen has consistently been among the most positive and impactful individuals I've encountered in my web3 journey. Over the past two-plus years, he has consistently demonstrated encouragement, helpfulness, integrity, kindness, and genuine care. Whether I'm seeking advice related to web3 or something else entirely, I can always count on his insight and wisdom.

on Kalen · 1307· 1y ago9

“No follow through, No vision. Typical web3 grift.”I usually try to be a bit more insightful but once you see a grifter grift a few times the patterns become very obvious. Not much to say other than avoid.

on Believe · 682· 1y ago · negative15

“An amazing founder.”Avatar has led the HoH community extremely well. Always gone above and beyond to create value and connections within the group. He's one of the best.

on Maximillion J Pegasus 🕸️ · 1295· 1y ago7

“One of the most insightful in the space”Always have respected Zhu. Beyond his conviction in Azuki which is obvious he always moves with integrity, always insightful on the timeline.

on Zhu · 1314· 1y ago6

“What do I know about Mage? Just 3 years of consistently showing up.”Originally met mage when he was staff at metav3rse. he was always a friendly and helpful presence. Its really great to see him active daily and doing his thing over such a long period of time, I think consistency and integrity are some of the most important measurements in web3.

on mage · 1282· 1y ago5

“EIP-8: Invite Liability for AI Slop / Bot Accounts”Summary Introduces a penalty and safeguard system for inviters who onboard AI- or bot-controlled accounts. It adds multi-sig bot detection, a 7-day remediation window, a 23-day public appeal process, escalating strikes on negligent inviters, and an Invite-Bot Ratio lock. The goal is to stop bad actors earlier while protecting legitimate users from false blame. 1 Motivation Bots dilute credibility; AI-generated “slop” reviews and automation cheapen Ethos signals. The invite mechanism already serves as a Sybil throttle (90-day, 20 % score bond); this EIP extends it with explicit bot penalties. Previous EIPs neutralize content after posting; this one targets bad actors before they gain traction. 2 Definitions & Context Inviter – Ethos profile that sent the on-chain invite. Invitee – Address that accepted the invite. AI-Bot – Invitee meeting at least two detection signals (see 3.1) and losing its appeal. Strike – Recorded against the inviter when an invitee is confirmed AI-Bot. IBR (Invite-Bot Ratio) – Confirmed Strikes ÷ Accepted Invites (rolling 12 months). EIP-7 – Sets review impact to zero for spam or “review-for-review” text. EIP-6 – Deducts points when recipients down-vote bogus positive reviews. 3 Specification 3.1 Detection signals (any two trigger 3.2) - 70 % or more of invitee reviews flagged as spam (EIP-7). - Three or more positive reviews down-voted by recipients within 30 days (EIP-6). - No attestations, vouches, or wallet signatures after 30 days. - Non-human behavior pattern (24×7 posting, low text perplexity, copy-paste activity). 3.2 Timeline & appeal Day 0 – Suspected Bot: detection engine flags account (no penalty yet). Days 0-7 – Quarantine: invitation link frozen; inviter and invitee alerted; invitee may pass CAPTCHA plus wallet signature to clear flag. Day 7 – Confirmed Bot: if still flagged, invitee score drops to zero and a tentative Strike is applied to the inviter; account becomes eligible for appeal. Days 7-30 – Appeal window: invitee may file a public Plea, triggering a 72-hour community vote. Plea + 3 days – Voting closes: vote result either removes or upholds the flag and Strike. No Plea by Day 30 or vote upholds flag – Final: Strike locks in; no further appeals. 3.3 Penalty ladder for the inviter - Strike 1 – 25 points; no invite freeze. - Strike 2 – 50 points; invite freeze 7 days. - Strike 3 – 100 points; invite freeze 30 days. - Strike 4+ – Fibonacci sequence (0,1,1,2,3…) × 50 points, capped at –400; invite freeze 90 days plus *ADMIN* review. (Strike remains tentative until Day 30 or until a vote upholds the flag.) 3.4 IBR limit If more than 15 % of your accepted invites become confirmed bots within the past 12 months, your invite button locks until the ratio falls below 15 %. Example: 40 invites allow up to 6 bots; the 7th freezes inviting. 4 Safeguards - Two-signal rule reduces false positives. - Seven-day remediation lets real humans prove themselves quickly. - Public vote aligns with existing governance and keeps costs low. - Strikes decay after 12 months, rewarding improved diligence. 5 Future considerations - Proof-of-Personhood (KYC-lite, opt-in): verified humans earn a small permanent score bonus. - Dynamic machine-learning thresholds to catch new AI patterns without additional EIPs. - Light liability for early vouchers of bots after 90 days. Vote: https://snapshot.box/#/s:ethos-labs.eth/proposal/0xda6239ea33ca41ac4b6884b7a2ae89051172639e869b35bbbdb87ba8b517a43f

on Ethos · 2342· 1y ago · neutral22

“Solana’s “bitcoin pizza””The overall solana ecosystem would not be where it is at today if pump.fun didn’t exist. I have many complaints about the platform and what it’s done but it’s impact on bringing new volume is undeniable. But at the end of the day PF is a net positive.

on Pump.fun · 839· 1y ago11

“Measured and consistent — always willing to share both his knowledge and wisdom.”buz has been a constant presence within the discord server ever since I started getting a bit more active on the network and in the community. From early on it was clear that he had a wealth of knowledge about ethos' inner-workings and overall platform. He is also an very talented dev who has built the excellent https://www.ethosians.com/ platform. But what really stood out to me was the wisdom he shared whenever he could. For a project like Ethos to succeed you need nuanced and insightful voices who not only have a firm understanding of the platform but also have a disposition towards what is right and just and is also willing to share their thoughts (and their time) confidently. Thats hard to find and buz nailed it.

on buz · 1949· 1y ago18

‹ Back35 of 35 · most upvoted first