Believe

373 reviews, 24% of them positive.24% positive · 373 reviews· Influence factor 95, above 19% of accounts

The record

From 125 activities · Apr 2026

Believe is a Solana launchpad platform founded by Ben Pasternak that has faced overwhelming criticism for broken promises, locked funds, and repeated token migrations. Users report scam-like behavior including rug pulls, supply manipulation, poor support, unresponsive teams, and failed product delivery—with particular concerns about the chaotic $LAUNCHCOIN to $BELIEVE migration involving admitted 'math errors' and the project's history as a rebranded version of the failed Clout token. While a small number of supporters praise its innovation in lowering barriers to token launches, the dominant sentiment reflects distrust, financial losses, and accusations of deliberate extraction tactics.

What people say

Received · 373 Given · 0

“Terrible Lauchpad For Scams And Rugs”Believeapp started with the promise of being a platform for innovation, but its track record tells a different story. Over time, it's become increasingly associated with low-quality launches, questionable projects, and teams that disappear just as quickly as they arrive. For a platform positioned as a launchpad, due diligence and trust are non-negotiable, but both appear to be lacking here. The frequency of rugs and poorly vetted tokens has raised serious concerns within the community.

theNFTtutor (TUTOR TECH) · 1315· 1y ago · negative15

“More Red Flags Than a Parade”This project, now called Believe, is run by the same team that was behind Clout/Pasternak, and yeah, there's a lot of messy history there. They lost a ton of trust after their first token dropped over 90% and they completely failed to deliver on their promises. The biggest issue for a lot of people is the rebrand itself—trying again with what seems to be the same token contract feels pretty sketchy. On top of that, the product isn't seen as anything special, and their new strategy of launching coins tied to web2 companies just feels off and misguided. With a track record like that, it's tough to get behind what they're doing now.

Raiman · 1314· 1y ago · negative15

“Mặc dù đội ngũ đã từng không có trách nhiệm với token, Believe vẫn là một sản phẩm có sự sáng tạo”Believe cho phép mọi người khởi tạo token trên Solana bằng cách đơn giản là nhắn một ticker trên X và sau đó tag handle của Believe. Dự án cũng ra mắt token Launchcoin trên nền tảng của chính mình, nhưng đã để mặc cho giá của token dump vài trăm lần. Tôi không phủ nhận những điểm xấu này, nhưng hiện tại Believe đã quay trở lại và tôi cũng đã kiếm được tiền nhờ sự trở lại đó, dự án cũng có những góc độ tích cực của nó, điều quan trọng là nó vẫn đang cải thiện. Nếu Believe tiếp tục tỏ ra thiếu trách nhiệm, tôi sẽ sẵn sàng đánh giá tiêu cực dự án trên nền tảng của Ethos.

Veins · 1210· 1y ago15

“Disguised a rug pull as a rebrand”I was holding $LAUNCHCOIN and truly believed in the product back in autumn '25. But suddenly, they decided to 'rebrand,' and the token immediately went down. I found out too late that this is the second time Pasternak has pulled this stunt. Absolute scammers.

AndrewD · 1676· 8mo ago · negative18

“"Based Chad"”Believe is one of the most based people in this space. He always ready to help others anytime his attention is needed. He truly a selfless human being that always put others first. An amazing chad.

LegitBosz · 1280· 9mo ago18

“Sketchy and Overhyped”Feels more like a scam than innovation. Zero trust in these extraction platforms clunky app, no real value, and high risk of getting burned. Best to stay away

Henry · 1256· 1y ago · negative14

“serial rebrander, same extraction game”every cycle it's the same script, overpromise, underdeliver, rebrand, repeat

mstlvc · 1295· 1y ago · negative14

“I don't trust the project team.”I don't trust the project team. They promised a normal product but in fact they are using the platform to make money on people.

Jonny Veselka · 1422· 1y ago · negative17

“Don't fall for the rebrand hype”This whole "believe" thing feels like a repeat performance from the past, especially with that founder's history. so many people got burned before, and it seems like the same old token contract is back in play. they're launching coins from twitter, even with web2 companies, which just gives retail the wrong idea about investing. creators are saying they aren't even getting their promised cut, and some folks can't even pull their money out. it just feels like another pump and dump machine designed for insiders, not real innovation.

Selvy · 1219· 1y ago · negative17

“Nothing Worked As Promised”The project started with a lot of hype but delivered nothing in practice the team ignored creators and users all features were flawed and support was poor a disappointing and unreliable experience.

Donya · 1241· 10mo ago · negative24

“Brutal Reality Check”This Solana launchpad is a total disaster. Constant bugs, stuck fee claims, wallet disconnects, zero customer support, and launch after launch turning into rugs or 90%+ dumps. Token rebrands, shady comms, and community rage everywhere. Feels like an extraction machine. Avoid at all costs. 1/5 pure disappointment.

Rikhav 🫎 · 1269· 9mo ago · negative13

“Didn’t meet expectations”The promises of the project looked good on paper, but when I actually tried it, it was disappointing. Instead of bringing any real value, it only felt like a waste of time.

bhrbkl35 · 1385· 1y ago · negative16

‹ Back120 of 373 · most upvoted firstMore ›