MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓351aadvark↓277Majdi↓263TradeSk0rp.eth↑48.8%Ethos↓1.7%vitalik.eth↑1.0%jeff.hl↑1.0%VouchesTucosalamanca943 WHUF → EthosDpuck (bob)50 WHUF → freshout.ape 🍄🦍MMatt25 WHUF → Rahulxero.hlAnton Boiarchuk10 WHUF → Sk0rp.ethReviewsTbeagle ⨀positive · 24 upvotesBboatpositive · 10 upvotesRahulxero.hlpositive · 8 upvotesSk0rp.ethpositive · 5 upvotes
Profile· Established@blknoiz06On Ethos
Ansem 🐂🀄️

Ansem 🐂🀄️

573 reviews, 50% of them positive.50% positive · 573 reviews· Influence factor 417, above 82% of accounts

The record

From 167 activities · Apr 2026

Ansem is a highly influential Solana and memecoin trader known for early calls on major narratives—particularly buying Solana at the bottom and spotting WIF early—and for building a massive, cult-like following on Crypto Twitter. However, they are heavily criticized for repeatedly shilling low-cap memecoins with extreme conviction, allegedly using followers as exit liquidity, promoting projects that later collapsed or were accused of being rugs, and making unverified claims about their trading history and holdings. While some respect their market timing instincts and narrative-spotting ability, the consistent pattern of undisclosed paid promotions, lack of accountability when shilled coins fail, and accusations of pump-and-dump behavior have made them a deeply polarizing figure—praised by believers as a sharp operator but viewed by skeptics as an extractor exploiting retail traders.

“Manufactured volume is not product-market fit”Ansem recently launched ansem.io positioning it as a curated launchpad and “trust layer” for token launches the first Diamond Tier project $EYE required the team behind a token to buy and permanently burn 370508 $ANSEM - roughly $100k and go via Ansem's launchpad team curation process before launch yet almost immediately after launch $EYE displayed tens of millions of dollars in trading volume with activity that raised serious questions about how much of that volume represented genuine organic demand versus automated/bot-driven trading that distinction matters.. when a launch is explicitly marketed as curated and teams are paying six figures for the highest trust tier, retail participants naturally assign additional credibility to the projects carrying that badge If abnormal trading activity is then used to create the appearance of demand while insiders or early participants extract liquidity from incoming buyers, the “trust layer” becomes part of the problem rather than the solution I cannot independently prove the intent behind every bot or wallet involved so I won't call this an outright scam but the launch dynamics I've observed are enough for me to treat Ansem's launchpad curation and the projects promoted through it with extreme caution a $100k burn and a Diamond badge shouldn't be mistaken for proof that a launch is safe or that the displayed volume represents genuine market demand for a platform built around monetizing trust and attention, transparency around insiders, affiliated wallets and the source of trading volume should be the absolute minimumDRAMA❤️ · 1441· 59d ago · negative38
‹ Back156 of 573 · most upvoted firstMore ›