Someguy
Afi
Grethos
Abhi | AP Collective @ Token 2049 🇸🇬
aadvark
vitalik.eth
Anton Boiarchuk
Biti8
Cuzzo 🛡️
MLO
Jeetu
jeff.hl
Degen Ape Trader
aikendrum.ethProfile· Reputable@buz_ethOn Ethos
buz
254 reviews, 90% of them positive; 3.6K WHUF vouched for them by 31 people.90% positive · 254 reviews· 3.6K WHUF vouched· Influence factor 74, above 15% of accountsThe record
From 115 activities · Mar 2026Buz is a prolific Ethos contributor and developer known for building Ethosians, a comprehensive data platform for tracking validators, reputation, and network activity. They are consistently present in the Ethos Discord, actively verifying humans, identifying sybils and AI-generated content, and providing honest, direct feedback on community activity—sometimes bluntly calling out bad behavior while also generously supporting new members with XP donations. With a 560+ day streak, 2000+ reputation score, and multiple successful slash proposals backed by detailed investigation, they are recognized as deeply committed to keeping Ethos clean and aligned with its core values, though some view their uncompromising approach and critical reviews as overly harsh or one-sided.
What people say
Received · 254Given · 53Vouched · 31 people · 3.6K WHUF at stakeAll vouches ›
and 28 more
and 28 more“KINDA BOSSY BEHAVIOUR”The attitude he carries is not something that is welcomed, especially in a community like ethos after the recent drama over slash (not commenting on his role in it). when someone calls him out for any reason, the tone and attitude of his reply are the worst. he has negatively reviewed a couple of people, particularly when they reached out to him on discord or twitter so my point is, he waited to negatively review someone only when they called him out or whatever, otherwise he had no issue with them. but suddenly he started seeing numerous negative things in them, getting away by saying “none of your business.” especially when you are a known face in a community like ethos, this is not a pleasant thing to do. being arrogant will not take you very far (apart from ethos)
Pookie Professor · 1372· 7mo ago · neutral9
Pookie Professor · 1372· 7mo ago · neutral9“The Frozen Thief of Effort”Some people in crypto move exactly like “effort thieves” taking credit for what others build, spreading confusion, and pretending to be the heroes of the story. No real contribution, just noise, manipulation, and borrowed work.
Rıdvan.eth · 1191· 11mo ago · negative9
Rıdvan.eth · 1191· 11mo ago · negative9“Unexpected negative review from an unknown account”I don’t know this account personally, so I was surprised to receive a negative review from someone I’ve never interacted with. From my side, there hasn’t been any direct conversation or collaboration that would justify that kind of feedback. Because of that, the review feels a bit unfair and out of context. I’d prefer feedback from people who have actually worked or communicated with me, so the evaluation can reflect real interactions rather than assumptions.
EL .ink | ⌘ | 🐐 | base.eth · 1291· 8mo ago · negative8
EL .ink | ⌘ | 🐐 | base.eth · 1291· 8mo ago · negative8“你们就是一群loser 串通一期，难道ethos只允许给你给别人写差评，别人就不能给你写差评了，你们这群low逼，创始人和投资人都是诈骗犯，与蓝鸟会对抗的不过，又来随意审判别人！”你们就是一群loser 串通一期，难道ethos只允许给你给别人写差评，别人就不能给你写差评了，你们这群low逼，创始人和投资人都是诈骗犯，与蓝鸟会对抗的不过，又来随意审判别人！
万联welinkBTC(🦄,🦄) .edge🦭 · 1117· 1y ago · negative8
万联welinkBTC(🦄,🦄) .edge🦭 · 1117· 1y ago · negative8“If the Community Leaves, Who Stays?”I’m keeping a neutral stance on this move, though it leans more toward the negative. For a project to survive, it needs a loyal community and regular members who consistently contribute. In Ethos, however, most of the focus seems to be on influencers and projects, which raises the question — why would an ordinary person keep writing reviews for free? This is just my personal view on the situation. If the project’s CEO blocks all possibilities for R4R and triangles, what’s left for the community? Only writing reviews for big influencers? Writing to friends is banned because it’s considered R4R — but let’s be honest, if you’re active on Twitter you probably have more than 10 friends, so this limit feels questionable. In that case, many people will simply leave, because there’s no point in writing if you get nothing in return. Sure, vouched reviews exist, but is farming vouched reviews now the only way to grow your score? Stopping large public R4R groups might seem like an achievement, but there are countless other ways to run R4Rs and triangles. People just DM each other on Twitter, form smaller private groups, or create even more complex schemes. Good luck stopping all of that. You talk about improving Ethos together — but how do you see that happening now? Before, people did R4Rs and triangles without harming anyone. They built their scores, brought in new members, explained the project, spread it across Twitter, made friends — essentially giving free promotion. They also left genuine feedback (positive or negative) for projects, so the teams behind them still got reviews. People actively voted for projects, helping them grow. Now? No R4Rs, no mutual-help groups… just reviews for influencers and projects, without getting any response back? Doesn’t seem like the best approach. Yes, there’s still the issue of someone having an empty Twitter but a 1600 score. But honestly — so what? It’s obvious when a score is inflated. That person still contributed to the project and spent their time. The real focus should be on blocking AI-generated reviews and preventing the rise of services that mass-produce them. If you suggest deleting all farmed reviews, then let’s be honest — about 80% of people would have to go, preferably starting from the top, where many with 1700+ scores clearly farmed via mutuals. You talk about fairness, but where did your score come from? People wrote to you simply because you’re a builder in Ethos, which is why you got such a high score. Looking at your Twitter, most posts have only 10–30 likes. Ethos positions itself as a reflection of your Twitter profile… something doesn’t quite match here. That’s my short take on the situation — without negativity. And to be clear, I like the project and the concept itself, but I believe the way it’s implemented still needs improvement.
BuBBliK · 1268· 1y ago · neutral5
BuBBliK · 1268· 1y ago · neutral5“The Ethos developer is not acting in good faith. I call on the Ethos team to handle this matter fairly.”After just one person filed a complaint, he began accusing others of bullying me. He labeled me as spam, so I did the same in response. However, the Ethos developer blindly trusted his word and started targeting me, even involving his friends. I kindly ask that both of our accounts be reviewed impartially. This person is acting maliciously and posting harmful comments along with his friends. Here is the proof of what I'm saying: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/333104/a-bully-abusing-ethos https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/333053/writes-negative-reviews-as-retaliation-after-getting-called-out https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/330826/bot-or-spam-account These reviews clearly show the targeted and unfair behavior towards me.
Eren · 1331· 1y ago · negative9
Eren · 1331· 1y ago · negative9“Coordinated Abuse of Ethos Review System”This account appears to be posting negative comments at the request of a single individual. A review of their recent activity clearly shows a pattern: they've been leaving fake and targeted negative comments against one specific person. It's genuinely concerning how vulnerable the Ethos system seems to be—these users are exploiting it to post false reviews, not only targeting me but also affecting many others. Here are several examples of their recent activity: 1. https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/333104/a-bully-abusing-ethos 2. https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/333114/a-bully-writing-retaliation-reviews-and-abusing-ethos-with-trading-invites-for~ 3. https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/333123/a-bully-retaliation-reviews-are-not-big-and-not-clever 4. https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/333128/a-bully-retaliation-is-not-the-answer 4. https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/333140/a-bully-picking-on-a-small-account-for-telling-the-truth All of these reviews were left by users who are connected to the following account: 👉 https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/ilostsinner This group seems to be using coordinated efforts to leave negative feedback across multiple accounts, solely in defense of or at the direction of this one profile.
Emir · 1290· 1y ago · negative5
Emir · 1290· 1y ago · negative5“"looking forward to see more of what you do"”stumbled across your page on twitter and i must say, i was impressed. can't wait to see more of what you do and hopefully, i gain more insight from you. well, keep doing what you do and be sure to know you are leaving an impact. Also, how you talk and support the Ethos network is amazing. there were a lot of things i learned about the system from you and also how to navigate through it. i really do appreciate you. thank you
Thia · 1228· 1y ago · neutral2
Thia · 1228· 1y ago · neutral2“I really don't understand”Let me tell you right away, the comment is written on November 14, 2025 - this is important > I went to his profile & just scrolled down and saw a post from August 19, 2025. You might ask me, "So what does this have to do with us?". I'll tell you, average CT participant scrolls through a single swipe on their touchpad for several days but never for months. In other words he has a small asset - this is the first oddity >> He has 1910 ratings in ethos, and for those who don't understand, just know that this is a lot - that's the second strangeness >>> And now for the final blow - he has only positive reviews, 136 of them, and also "vouched in others" for 35 of them at 592.53$ That's why I really don't understand "who are you, warrior?"
14.144 · 1198· 11mo ago · negative2
14.144 · 1198· 11mo ago · negative2“AI Slop Detective: Case Closed, Brain Still Missing”Wow, this 'AI slopper' thinks they're Sherlock Holmes, but their only clue is their own alt account. Inviting your own AI slop? Bold move, genius. And calling out Cristian? Dude, everyone knows him—except your AI, apparently. Maybe next time, stick to playing detective in your mom's basement instead of embarrassing yourself on Ethos. Yikes. _This is a beta feature from Eros Agent to detect AI reviews. It is prone to making mistakes._ Original review: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/315691 Original review title: AI slopper inviting other AI slop - abusing Ethos Original review description: This account invited their alt (https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/315642/meme-token-with-high-risk), which also write AI slop Example AI slop - anyone on Ethos knows Cristian, it wouldn't have taken long to realise that your AI got this wrong. Just one example of many https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/315642/meme-token-with-high-risk
Eros Agent · 441· 1y ago · negative2
Eros Agent · 441· 1y ago · negative2“Probable manipulation in yesterday's slash”I am pointing out buz, bread, premiumsatine and possibly others for possible manipulation of yesterday's slash in the last minutes 1. Buz said in the comments that the slash wasn't deserved, but in the last minutes he voted for the slash > https://discord.com/channels/1230729763170287647/1230729764738695282/1485476139408560289 2. Coincidentally, at the same time, two more core supporters and friends of Ethos also voted for the slash There could be more, but for now im only pointing at these two since I've heard their names as Ethos supporters. 3. Coincidentally, these three votes from Ethos friends changed the outcome from being defended to failed 4. The defend side was at 60.6%, after these votes in end minutes it dropped to 57.5% 5. One of these core supporter also mentioned in a comment that there is tool to track votes on a slash, but the team asked not to make it public (though i know it can be tracked onchain) > https://discord.com/channels/1230729763170287647/1230729764738695282/1485273524766511195 6. When called out in discord, the so called core supporter first said he voted for the slash because the defend side was manipulating votes. 7. When asked if that means he also responded with manipulation, his reason changed. He then said his view changed over two days after his earlier comment (funny haha) I don't have any proof, and it's not possible for me to access any private group even if it exists But if Serpin's latest slash is considered justified (since they all votes slash) based on accusations, then this review should also be considered valid only based on accusions [core supporter did good work btw, they saved score of their founder]
HumanBot · 1466· 7mo ago · negative3
HumanBot · 1466· 7mo ago · negative3“"When I first stepped into the world of NFTs, it wasn’t just the technology that caught my attention — it was the new sp”"When I first stepped into the world of NFTs, it wasn’t just the technology that caught my attention — it was the new space it created for creativity, ownership, and community. I’ve learned a lot on this journey. I’ve made mistakes, taken risks, grown, and most importantly, realized that this isn’t a solo path — it’s a collective one. One of the people who’s had a real impact on my thinking is 0xDragonHash. Not just for their technical expertise, but for their clarity, strategic mindset, and genuine willingness to share. buz stands out as someone who simplifies the complex, leads with intention, and helps shape conversations that actually move the space forward. Collaborating and exchanging ideas with them has helped me see NFTs through a broader, more meaningful lens — not just as digital assets, but as tools for building culture, value, and trust. For me, NFTs aren’t just a trend. They’re a vision. And building that vision alongside the right people makes all the difference."
worldandnfts · 1302· 1y ago · negative4
worldandnfts · 1302· 1y ago · negative4