Cryptozero

77 reviews, 88% of them positive.88% positive · 77 reviews· Influence factor 0, above 0% of accounts

The record

From 66 activities · May 2026

A Web3 contributor known for clear, substance-focused analysis of DeFi protocols, privacy infrastructure (Zama, Linera), and tokenization of real-world assets. Praised for patient explanations, consistency across communities, and willingness to share insights without hype—though facing persistent criticism for using AI-generated reviews and retaliatory behavior when called out, which has undermined trust despite strong endorsements from those who value their technical depth and supportive presence.

What people say

Received · 77 Given · 79

“Hardworking friend”I've known soha for years and we have had a great time working together. she is very kind and patient and tries to help everyone. Whenever someone asks me for a knowledgeable person to use her posts, I will recommend eagle.

on Soha Noya · 1294· 1y ago10

“Crypto community You Need”I first got to know gilgamesh through his posts on Linera and Klay, and what impressed me was how clear and practical his takes were. Instead of chasing hype, he breaks things down so people actually understand what’s going on. In group discussions he’s the kind of person who answers questions patiently and shares resources that save you time. That mix of consistency, technical depth, and willingness to help makes him a voice you can trust in Web3

on gilgamesh · 1275· 1y ago10

“All review written by AI”See all her reviews. She obviously use AI. It feels sometimes change some words. I dont like this

on 🟦 €STΞL 🟨 · 1276· 11mo ago · negative22

“Title: Steady Guidance and Genuine Impact in Web3”I know Goli from her presence across Web3 circles, particularly through projects like Union and Kaito. She consistently brings clarity to complex topics such as interoperability and chain abstraction, breaking them down in a practical and approachable way. What stands out most is her sincerity she focuses on real understanding, not hype. Goli’s dedication, reliability, and willingness to help others have made her a trusted and respected figure in the community.

on goli · 1277· 1y ago10

“Best and active friend and expert teammate”No Name is one of those rare people who combine intelligence with real attention to detail.We first met on X, and what began as a simple chat has grown into a solid and professional connection.She consistently brings fresh,practical ideas to projects and makes sure progress stays on track.On top of that, he’s always ready to help his friends. Being around someone like him is both encouraging and full of valuable lessons.

on Atefe- Noya · 1307· 1y ago10

“A Rare Voice of Honesty and Clarity in Crypto Analysis”I’ve been following this account closely, and what stands out is how grounded the content is in real project analysis rather than hype. The posts break down essentials from team credibility to token distribution while also calling out overpromises and risks without hesitation. That level of honesty and clarity is rare, making this account a genuinely valuable voice in the space.

on Moon · 1285· 1y ago5

“Amirabbas A Trusted Voice for Clear Insights on Web3, Scalability, and Layer-2 Solution”I connected with Amirabbas through a Web3 community forum. He regularly provides in-depth analyses on blockchain scalability, layer-2 solutions, and decentralized applications. If you want clear, thoughtful updates on the latest trends in Web3 and practical insights into the ecosystem, this account is definitely worth following.

on Amirabbas π² · 1275· 1y ago5

“Disappointing Experience with monad Unfair Airdrop Distribution”As someone who was initially excited about monad and its potential in the blockchain space, I feel compelled to share my disappointment with the project, particularly regarding its airdrop distribution. While monad promised an inclusive and rewarding approach to its community, the execution of the airdrop has left many early supporters, including myself, feeling sidelined and undervalued.The primary issue lies in the unfair distribution of the airdrop. Despite the project's claims of rewarding active community members, the allocation process seemed heavily skewed toward a small group of insiders or large stakeholders. Many dedicated users who contributed through engagement, testing, or promotion were either left with negligible rewards or entirely excluded. The lack of transparency in how the airdrop was calculated or distributed only added to the frustration. No clear criteria were shared, leaving the community guessing and speculating about favoritism or potential manipulation.Moreover, the communication from monad’s team has been lackluster. When concerns about the airdrop were raised on platforms like X, responses were either vague or nonexistent, which only fueled distrust. For a project that emphasizes decentralization and community involvement, this approach feels contradictory and alienates the very users who helped build early momentum.Beyond the airdrop, the project’s overall direction seems promising but lacks the polish expected from a team with such ambitious goals. Updates are sporadic, and the roadmap feels unclear, making it hard to stay confident in monad’s long-term vision. While I still believe in the potential of the technology, the handling of the airdrop and the lack of accountability have significantly dampened my enthusiasm.In conclusion, monad’s unfair airdrop distribution and poor community engagement have left a sour taste. I hope the team takes this feedback seriously and works to rebuild trust with their community. Until then, I can’t recommend getting deeply involved with this project.

on Monad · 1901· 1y ago · negative12

“A Disappointing Experience”I recently had an experience with Re that left much to be desired, and I feel compelled to share my thoughts. From the outset, the service promised a seamless and high-quality experience, but it fell short in several critical areas, making it a frustrating and underwhelming encounter.First and foremost, the customer service was lackluster. I reached out to Re ’s support team with a simple inquiry, but the response time was painfully slow taking over 48 hours to get a reply. When I finally received a response, it was generic and unhelpful, failing to address the specifics of my issue. This lack of attentiveness made me feel undervalued as a customer, and it set a poor tone for the rest of my experience.The product or service itself was equally disappointing. While Re ’s marketing materials boast innovation and reliability, what I received was far from that. The interface (if applicable) was clunky and unintuitive, making navigation a chore. Features that were heavily advertised either underperformed or were outright missing, which felt misleading. For instance, a key functionality I was counting on based on their promotional claims—either didn’t work as expected or was riddled with bugs, rendering it practically unusable.Additionally, the pricing structure felt deceptive. The initial cost seemed reasonable, but hidden fees and unexpected charges quickly added up, making the overall experience feel like a bait-and-switch. Transparency in pricing is crucial, and Re failed to deliver on this front, which eroded my trust in their brand.Another issue was the lack of follow-through. After raising my concerns, I was promised a resolution or at least some form of compensation, but nothing materialized. This lack of accountability only compounded my frustration. It’s clear that Re prioritizes acquiring customers over retaining them, which is a shortsighted approach in today’s competitive market.In summary, my experience with Re was marked by poor customer service, a subpar product, misleading pricing, and unfulfilled promises. I had high hopes based on their reputation, but the reality was a letdown. I would caution others to approach with skepticism and thoroughly research alternatives before committing. For now, I’ll be taking my business elsewhere, and I hope Re takes this feedback seriously to improve their offerings

on Re · 1471· 1y ago · negative12

“Where Genuine Perspective Meets Lasting Insight in the Web3 Space”Worked with Dash ali on a few projects and gotta say this guy's the real deal. Whether it's meme coins or serious Web3 stuff, he always comes through with solid research and straight talk. In this chaotic crypto world, you can actually trust what he says. He's not frontin' - if he doesn't know something, he'll tell you straight up. That's why everyone respects him.

on DASHALI · 1264· 1y ago15

“multi farmer and obviously use AI”He negative review users who review his another accounts like @ros1_crypto. If attention reviews and test them, he use AI to wrote reviews.

on siyamak · 1328· 11mo ago · negative13

“GiveRep Revolutionizing Web3 Reputation Your Gateway to Trustworthy Crypto Connections”Shoutout to GiveRep for flipping the script on Web3 trust issues! This powerhouse platform turns anonymous crypto dealings into a transparent, rewarding ecosystem where your reputation literally earns you perks. With 241K+ followers hooked on its vibe, GiveRep's blockchain magic makes vouching, verifying, and building cred as easy as a swipe. Love the "The reputation must flow" ethos – it's poetic, practical, and perfectly positions you ahead of the v1 drop. No more shady trades or FOMO; just pure, flowing rep that pays dividends.

on GiveRep · 1483· 12mo ago13

‹ Back60 of 79 · most upvoted firstMore ›