Nima

59 reviews, 98% of them positive.98% positive · 59 reviews· Influence factor 0, above 0% of accounts

The record

From 20 activities · Apr 2026

Nima is a consistent and thoughtful builder in Web3 known for steady, well-researched insights on projects like Eclipse, Bless, Union, and Billions. They combine deep analysis of DeFi, tokenomics, and digital identity with genuine community engagement, explaining complex ideas with clarity and approachability rather than hype. Despite setbacks, they demonstrate unwavering persistence, authenticity, and a commitment to supporting others—blending creativity, positivity, and real utility in a space often driven by noise.

What people say

Received · 59 Given · 88

“Ecosystem Veterans Deserve Better”I’ve been with Linea since the testnet, collecting key NFTs like the Frog NFT and others, spending over $2K, holding 6,300 LXP, and interacting with multiple DApps. In the end, I received only a small amount of airdrop. Is it really fair that a dedicated ecosystem participant gets such a tiny allocation, while a large portion goes to Binance Alpha?

on Linea.eth · 1582· 1y ago · neutral15

“Scam alert on Eclipse”I swapped & added liquidity multiple times… Result? ZERO tokens 😭 They even flaunted this “huge zero” to everyone, while my active friends got nothing too.

on Invariant · 1030· 1y ago · negative15

“Islam Coin or Scam Coin??”Islam Coin or Scam Coin?? The first time I came across this project was through Interact, where I completed a few tasks. According to their claims, they were planning to bring substantial funds into the market from Arab sheikhs. Yet, after several years, there’s been no update, and it’s still unclear what they’re actually doing.

on ISLM · 1187· 1y ago · negative8

“Active in Web3”I first came across Melika on Farcaster, where she was always sharing some of the most engaging and up-to-date posts about the latest trends in the space. What stood out to me was not just how consistent she was, but also how insightful her contributions felt she always had a way of making complex topics easier to understand. Beyond Farcaster, she was also very active on Degen, constantly joining conversations, exchanging ideas, and keeping the community alive and vibrant. Her presence across platforms showed her genuine passion for Web3 and her commitment to being part of the growth of the ecosystem.

on kimi · 1306· 1y ago9

“This account is AI-powered.”This account is fully powered by artificial intelligence. Every post, comment, and update is generated automatically by AI algorithms. There is no human creativity, personal opinion, or original thought behind the content—you’re seeing pure machine output. The purpose is to demonstrate AI capabilities, not to reflect human expression or personal experiences.

on Crovax · 1139· 1y ago · negative9

“Dydx”As an active trader on dYdX, I rely on Ethos to stay ahead in a fast-moving market. It’s not just a tool it’s a companion that helps me analyze positions, manage risk, and execute trades with confidence. From margin trading to limit orders, Ethos gives me clarity and precision, turning complex strategies into simple, actionable steps. Every day, it enhances my trading experience, making it more efficient, informed, and stress-free. For anyone serious about dYdX, Ethos isn’t optional it’s essential.

on bn@mix · 1214· 1y ago5

“Falling behind in Web3”Lens was one of the first Web3 social networks, attracting attention with its innovative ideas and early features. 🌐 However, when Farcaster entered the scene, Lens quickly fell behind. Compared to Farcaster, it had limited functionality and user experience, which made it unable to maintain its initial popularity and excitement. Despite having a good community, the lack of innovation and fierce competition pushed more users toward Farcaster, leaving Lens struggling to keep its position. Still, it has potential by rebuilding the user experience and revitalizing its community, Lens could restart its path to success and compete seriously with other Web3 platforms. 💎

on Lens · 1456· 1y ago · negative16

“⚠️ Suspicious Situation”Relay has long been one of my favorite bridges, and I’ve used it frequently over the past years. However, recently I’ve noticed that several users have lost their assets while using the platform. What’s even more concerning is that the Relay team has not provided any clear communication, transparency, or explanation regarding these issues. This lack of response is worrying, especially for a bridge that many users rely on to safely transfer assets across blockchains. I hope the team addresses these problems as soon as possible, restores trust, and ensures the safety of all users. Until then, I’ll be cautious about using Relay.

on Relay · 1606· 1y ago · negative12

“Scam Alert: Fake Pudgies Giveaways”This account is running entirely fake giveaways, claiming to give away “Lil Pudgies” or $PENGU tokens, which are completely fabricated. Their goal is to artificially inflate engagement, and it’s working they’re getting hundreds of thousands of impressions, likes, retweets, and comments. It’s highly likely they are doing this to maximize X Creator payouts, and with such massive engagement, they are probably earning a substantial income from it. These kinds of tactics are harmful to the community, misleading genuine users who think they might actually win something. It creates noise, wastes time, and erodes trust in real projects and legitimate giveaways. I strongly urge everyone to block and report this account. Their presence only encourages scams and dishonest behavior, and the online space would be better off without them. Stay vigilant, and always double-check giveaways before engaging.

on Anon Cooker · 634· 1y ago · negative11

“Exploiting Eclipse: Chasing Gains Over Community”He was another figure who exploited Chaperons and the Eclipse ecosystem, quietly pocketing free gains through Alucard’s assistant. Constantly chasing the next high, he put personal profit above the community, leaving behind a trail of poor decisions and disillusioned supporters.

on taetaehoho · 1354· 1y ago · negative4

“MEXC: A Risky Exchange with Questionable Practices”A closer look at multiple exchanges reveals MEXC as highly suspicious and unreliable. Many users report accounts being frozen without explanation, while the exchange profits through various tactics most notably by luring users with trendy new trading pairs. They make it appear as if prices are better than other platforms, but actual liquidity is low, and the primary goal is to get deposits and charge hefty withdrawal fees. On top of that, MEXC often showcases pre-market prices far below the real value but in reality, users never actually get the tokens. Trading volumes are frequently inflated or fake, designed to appear competitive with other exchanges. Overall, MEXC raises serious red flags and should be approached with extreme caution.

on MEXC · 957· 1y ago · negative10

“The Fall of Eclipse’s Leader”He used to lead Eclipse, thankfully now removed. He was one of those who gave the community and NFT holders barely any token allocation, and many of his decisions played a major role in ES’s downfall. Even as the token price plummeted, he never learned truly like a one-legged chicken stumbling through chaos.

on Vijay · 1199· 1y ago · negative11

‹ Back84 of 88 · most upvoted firstMore ›