MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓352Abhi | AP Collective @ Token 2049 🇸🇬↓281Majdi↓266TradeBrandon scott↑1.0%vitalik.eth↑1.5%Ethos↑1.0%Ansem 🐂🀄️↑1.0%VouchesMLO990 WHUF → Serpin TaxtMLO496 WHUF → CirrusMLO100 WHUF → Phoenix 🐦‍🔥MLO100 WHUF → OSFReviewsCoinbase Ventures 🛡️positive · 90 upvotesgabriel shapiropositive · 78 upvotes一川drive 🔴positive · 38 upvotesaiobkhan ✨positive · 29 upvotes
Profile· Neutral@frambul_nftOn Ethos
frambul

frambul

27 reviews, 93% of them positive.93% positive · 27 reviews· Influence factor 5, above 1% of accounts

The record

From 10 activities · Jul 2026

Active and trusted voice in crypto and NFT communities, known for deep Ethereum analysis, valuable market insights, and genuine, informative content that helps newcomers. Closely associated with Puffpaw and Ethos Network, where they contribute authentically and support others without hesitation. Respected for trustworthy demeanor, helpful engagement, and commitment to originality across Web3 spaces, particularly within Turkish crypto communities.

“Base app”Starting today, Frambul's focus will be base app. I believe this is primarily due to the inadequacy of platforms like Kaito/InfoFi-AttantionFi/SocialFi (I'll collectively refer to these platforms as Squirrel in this review). All of these Squirrel ecosystems are unsustainable and fail to provide a fair distribution of revenue. Furthermore, popular Squirrel ecosystems, especially Kaito, are dishonest with their users regarding their algorithms. For example, Kaito, the most popular Squirrel platform, advises content creators to prioritize quality over quantity, but if you check the Kiato leaderboards, you'll notice many AI content creators or spamming "content creators" are at the top. Because of all these logical fallacies, calling Squirrel ecosystems INFORMATION-FINANCE is actually an incomplete description. Squirrel ecosystems lack both quality INFORMATION and sustainable FINANCE. Beyond all this, I believe the worst aspect of squirrel ecosystems is that they destroy the culture of criticism. Squirrel ecosystems only encourage advertising. (Yes, so-called quality content seems important, but the truth is: if you want to earn income on Squirrel ecosystems, you need to be a promoter or have a high follower count.) By the way, don't get me wrong, I don't mean to suggest that Squirrel ecosystems are completely awful or to disrespect those who profit from them. I've already written a lot of content for Kaito and earned a small income, but I've finally realized that Squirrel ecosystems aren't for me and don't contribute to my personal development. (I have no respect for AI content creators and the like.) I'll write content for some projects I see as opportunities in the future, but Squirrel ecosystems will no longer be my primary focus. So, What Makes Base app Different from Squirrel Ecosystems? I think the biggest difference is that Base app offers a more sustainable system than Squirrel ecosystems and keeps revenues more equitable. Also, since the project is still in beta, I've observed a very nice community developing within it. This eliminates the toxic user problem found in Squirrel ecosystems. Additionally, the Base app doesn't restrict SocialFi by offering only the option to be a content creator. There's a lot you can do on Baseapp, including app development. This provides a more conducive environment for developing your own unique style. My thoughts on the Base app aren't based on my current experience, as I haven't joined Baseapp yet, but this review will help me work harder toward my primary goal of joining.on Coinbase Wallet · 1673· 1y ago9
‹ Back48 of 90 · most upvoted firstMore ›