MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓351aadvark↓277Majdi↓266TradeSk0rp.eth↑48.8%Brandon scott↑1.0%vitalik.eth↑1.7%Ethos↑1.0%VouchesSyrup69 WHUF → OSFDpuck (bob)50 WHUF → freshout.ape 🍄🦍Dpuck (bob)30 WHUF → KingPickle 🪑Dpuck (bob)25 WHUF → osamafaheemm🤝Reviews一川drive 🔴positive · 77 upvotesMark Karpelèspositive · 56 upvotesaiobkhan ✨positive · 46 upvotesCryptoPasokospositive · 23 upvotes
Profile· Exemplary@jpeg_yakuzaOn Ethos
JPEG Yakuza

JPEG Yakuza

413 reviews, 96% of them positive; 192 WHUF vouched for them by 6 people.96% positive · 413 reviews· 192 WHUF vouched· Influence factor 100, above 20% of accounts

The record

From 93 activities · Apr 2026

JPEG Yakuza is a respected Web3 builder and community contributor known for designing airdrop systems, sharp analysis of token launches and incentive mechanics, and consistent, thoughtful content on crypto trends. They're recognized for reliability and follow-through—offering free human verification, showing up on time to commitments, and engaging meaningfully without performative noise. Active across Ethos, Wolves DAO, and Clique2046, they bring genuine passion for community building and long-term thinking to the space.

“I'm an Ethos Enjoyoorrr”I'm on a 40D streak of using Ethos & I won't deny at one point clocking in simply doing the daily contributions. The platform as it stands is far from perfect but I think it shows great promise. Here's an overview of what could use your improvement: > increase the onboarding of builders in the space: the platform currently makes it easier & more fruitful to onboard your peers in the space which isn't a big issue. The issue is that builders also need to feel compelled to join the network as they are the ones who will be using some of the infra/services out there & have the capacity to leave feedback that most users wouldn't necessarily know. Builders however are usually strung up between meetings etc, so it's about ensuring there's a sticky mechanism (akin to Kaito Smart Followers) that encourage them to join e.g. users have to meaningfully engage with their content on X & if they manage to get a review from them, they will get a boost > create a more opaque XP system: this is the trade off with laying out rules e.g. review gives you 5 points, invite gives you 15k points etc it'd be much better if these points were provided contextually according to the quality of your review whereby your content needs to be upvoted/downvoted by a number of folks to fully unlock & these users need to have a social graph that doesn't just feed into your echo chamber. > when a profile gets slashed, they should freeze the ability for users to review either profiles (to prevent communities retaliating & then deterring a user in speaking his honest thoughts) > small UX add where a user reviewing a profile in the daily contribution could have either a summary of that user based on the reviews he's received > more education around what a good review looks like - potentially a structure to abide by so there's less slop being pushed out Here's what I'm excited about this platform: > networking: successful teams have an insane amount of inbound polluting their DMs. Having a good reputation score on Ethos, provided they opened up the plaform, should make conversion rates higher. This also applied to different creators. > attribution: every team struggles with getting the right stakeholders onboard & true alignment is a tough nut to crack. I think that's where Ethos could provide another source of users, not simply shilling on the TL but rather providing valuable reviews (the conditions for the snapshot could be: have <1600 score & left a detailed review of the protocol airdropping with the following guidelines)on Ethos · 2343· 1y ago40
‹ Back72 of 443 · most upvoted firstMore ›