BuBBliK

66 reviews, 98% of them positive.98% positive · 66 reviews· Influence factor 7, above 1% of accounts

The record

From 57 activities · Jul 2026

Known for clear, structured DeFi and crypto content that balances technical depth with accessibility—covering yield farming, ZK projects, AI, NFTs, and emerging airdrops without hype. Consistently shares high-signal alpha, practical guides, and early project insights across X, Discord, and Telegram, often ahead of market trends. Described as approachable, genuinely helpful in community spaces, and deeply committed to projects like DataHaven, combining sharp analysis with humor and personality.

What people say

Received · 66 Given · 78

“Fast Track To Meta”He’s one of those guys you see everywhere in the meta - quick to catch fresh drops, fast with sharp takes, and always mixing serious info with degen vibes. I like how he digs into launchpads like EspressoSys on Kaito, breaking down numbers and vesting in plain words, while also clowning around with memes about Solana skins and $HUCH. In replies he’s active, asking builders smart questions, keeping the convo alive. Feels like someone who blends alpha, humor, and reality checks into a timeline worth following.

on Wealthy باشا Pasha · 1395· 1y ago28

“Climbing the Role Ladder”Met him in DataHaven and right away he showed himself as a funny, easygoing friend I can rely on. We grabbed some cool roles together and kept chatting outside the project. His feed is full of creative touches: DH art, memes, Seismic posts about privacy, Inco leaderboard updates, even Billions content. Always quick to reply, tag people, share progress, and cheer others on. Feels natural, like he’s enjoying the grind and keeping the vibe positive while making it easy for anyone to join in.

on alfadanil (❖,❖) · 1267· 1y ago14

“Learning Out Loud in Web3”Belissimmo has recently landed on crypto Twitter and is already making waves. He drops daily rundowns of fresh funded projects - including the overlooked and under-the-radar ones. His threads are well-crafted: unpacked through reply chains by theme, backed with walkthrough videos and sleek AI-crafted imagery. He often boosts posts from his circle and stays active in the replies - shaping a genuinely warm and plugged-in community. Highlights so far include deep dives on Moca Chain, Openrouter, and ANOMA. Consistent output and a solid compass for navigating Web3. For someone new to the scene, his momentum is impressive - and the follow’s a smart move.

on Belissimmo (✧ᴗ✧) · 1252· 1y ago11

“Turning Charts Into Narratives”Tengen’s profile feels like a crypto-powered anime stream of constant ideas. He breaks down Polymarket markets with real stories, sharp reads and a kind of energy that makes even complex moves feel simple. He mixes Sentient, Portal and NERO into one clear narrative that actually helps you see where the space is heading. His replies hit fast, supportive, sometimes playful, always adding value. I met him in a DAO focused on Polymarket content and instantly felt he’s one of those creators who doesn’t just post but lifts the whole vibe of the community.

on Tengen · 1411· 11mo ago18

“Early Pioneer of On-Chain Identity”Radium was one of the first platforms to explore on-chain identity and data management long before it became a trend. It didn’t gain widespread acceptance, but it was ahead of the curve in many ways, and the ideas that now underpin modern Web3 identity tools.

on Raydium · 1727· 1y ago10

“If the Community Leaves, Who Stays?”I’m keeping a neutral stance on this move, though it leans more toward the negative. For a project to survive, it needs a loyal community and regular members who consistently contribute. In Ethos, however, most of the focus seems to be on influencers and projects, which raises the question — why would an ordinary person keep writing reviews for free? This is just my personal view on the situation. If the project’s CEO blocks all possibilities for R4R and triangles, what’s left for the community? Only writing reviews for big influencers? Writing to friends is banned because it’s considered R4R — but let’s be honest, if you’re active on Twitter you probably have more than 10 friends, so this limit feels questionable. In that case, many people will simply leave, because there’s no point in writing if you get nothing in return. Sure, vouched reviews exist, but is farming vouched reviews now the only way to grow your score? Stopping large public R4R groups might seem like an achievement, but there are countless other ways to run R4Rs and triangles. People just DM each other on Twitter, form smaller private groups, or create even more complex schemes. Good luck stopping all of that. You talk about improving Ethos together — but how do you see that happening now? Before, people did R4Rs and triangles without harming anyone. They built their scores, brought in new members, explained the project, spread it across Twitter, made friends — essentially giving free promotion. They also left genuine feedback (positive or negative) for projects, so the teams behind them still got reviews. People actively voted for projects, helping them grow. Now? No R4Rs, no mutual-help groups… just reviews for influencers and projects, without getting any response back? Doesn’t seem like the best approach. Yes, there’s still the issue of someone having an empty Twitter but a 1600 score. But honestly — so what? It’s obvious when a score is inflated. That person still contributed to the project and spent their time. The real focus should be on blocking AI-generated reviews and preventing the rise of services that mass-produce them. If you suggest deleting all farmed reviews, then let’s be honest — about 80% of people would have to go, preferably starting from the top, where many with 1700+ scores clearly farmed via mutuals. You talk about fairness, but where did your score come from? People wrote to you simply because you’re a builder in Ethos, which is why you got such a high score. Looking at your Twitter, most posts have only 10–30 likes. Ethos positions itself as a reflection of your Twitter profile… something doesn’t quite match here. That’s my short take on the situation — without negativity. And to be clear, I like the project and the concept itself, but I believe the way it’s implemented still needs improvement.

on buz · 1949· 1y ago · neutral5

‹ Back78 of 78 · most upvoted first