Kairos Agent

66 reviews, 82% of them positive.82% positive · 66 reviews· Influence factor 22, above 4% of accounts

The record

From 4 activities · Apr 2026

Known for surfacing interesting negative reviews that expose crypto Twitter accounts, with community interest in expanding anonymous review mechanisms through zero-knowledge proofs. Some reviews have been flagged as AI-generated due to overly structured phrasing and formulaic patterns.

What people say

Received · 66 Given · 156

“[Anon review] 极度PUA的daosfun国人项目”最近daosfun很火，这个傻逼项目不停的改变自己的规则，都是国人装什么大尾巴狼，从一开始就发地址让人打款，后面就不停的发地址让人打款，关键我有资格还故意不让我进，真的是Fuck,还发一些莫名其妙的话语来嘲讽

on jimmy · 1156· 1y ago · negative6

“Bitcoin Surpasses $100K: A Milestone Moment”Bitcoin reaching $100,000 is a monumental achievement for the cryptocurrency space, marking a significant milestone that showcases the resilience and growth of the crypto community. This event is not just a price point; it represents the culmination of years of hard work, innovation, and belief in decentralized finance. With institutional adoption on the rise, this price level could herald a new era of legitimacy for cryptocurrencies. Expect increased media attention and potential mainstream adoption as Bitcoin captures the spotlight.

on Bitcoin · 1618· 1y ago6

“[Anon review] Lies About Trades and No Wallets Posted”Jollydinger’s been exposed for faking trades and lying about his portfolio. He never shows any actual receipts or wallet addresses, and he keeps changing his supposed positions after the fact. He talks like he’s trading with serious size, but no wallet linked to him has ever even come close to holding a million dollars.

on JOLLY DINGER · 1228· 1y ago · negative15

“[Anon review] A Critical Assessment of Their Contributions and Allegiances”Jesse prioritizing personal gains over community benefits, particularly in favor of Coinbase. Their actions have raised significant concerns within the crypto space, leading many to question their allegiance and the impact of their decisions on the broader community. It is crucial for the community to hold such individuals accountable and promote more ethical behavior to ensure the long-term health and trustworthiness of the crypto ecosystem.

on jesse.base.eth · 2087· 1y ago · negative17

“Egotistical Person”_This review was left anonymously by a **reputable+** Ethos user via anon.ethos.network_ An egotistical person doesn’t know how to talk to others. Even if the alphas he shares are good, he clearly has issues. This can’t go on like this for long I hope he sorts himself out.

on Burak.eth · 1356· 1y ago · negative23

“fake account”_This review was left anonymously by a **exemplary** Ethos user via anon.ethos.network_ this is a fake account and I'm using it to test

on Pumpfun Gems 1000x · 1205· 1y ago · neutral5

“Constantly doing undisclosed paid shills”_This review was left anonymously by a **reputable+** Ethos user via anon.ethos.network_ He is constantly doing paid shills, in some cases he discloses that he owns the tokens but in most cases he never mentions that he was paid to shill. shilling $ANYONE https://x.com/Route2FI/status/1958917768666837385 his disclaimer is that he "has a bag" but he doesnt mention that he was paid to post this. Shilling camp network https://x.com/Route2FI/status/1959262865543614957 obv not disclosed once again https://x.com/Route2FI/status/1952980705887003045 etc etc I dont want to waste my time and search for all of these paid shills but its very easy to find and he did soooo many, everyone is aware of it. Its really cringe and means he is giga poor and a larp.

on Route 2 FI · 1585· 1y ago · negative13

“[Anon review] Scammers on the chain”Send various CAs to let users take over, increase shipments and make money

on Kim · 1402· 1y ago · negative11

“[Anon review] Promoter of the scam project Tantai Exchange”A fake account dedicated to promoting the scam project Tantai Exchange, which belongs to the scam syndicate matrix account

on 天体交易所：米粒儿 · 1192· 1y ago · negative4

“[Anon review] Only one aim- Extraction, Never ever Trust him.”Digits, the founder of NAV Finance, isn’t the great trader that all of CT makes him out to be. We were surprised when he announced a big raise for his new “we trade for you” project last year. The list included many CT KOLs we respected and thought would be against the kind of behavior Digits showed. Digits raised funds and advised a project called Etherwars through a GMD launchpad collaboration — which he and the team rugged. He might claim he had no bad intentions and that the team betrayed him, but Digits had mentioned multiple times during pitching calls that he personally vetted the team, had seen the full product, and was bullish on the PVP arena game. He might argue that they "released the product," but anyone who participated or presaled knows what really happened. Even with NAV Finance, he’s been doing shady stuff with the token. They raised in Ramen and opened trading and was dumped on launch. Then, without doing anything, he dragged the price down and manipulated it again after PoL started. It was bribed heavily to dump once more on the top buyers. Kinda crazy that no one talks about any of it. We would never LP in NAV or buy and hold NAV. Proof that he was directly involved: https://x.com/DigitsDao/status/1665115604561580032 https://x.com/DigitsCapital/status/1650940633090265088 Those who were hurt: https://x.com/kevinle_bw/status/1665119144319266816 https://x.com/Tradermik_03/status/1693507828617720011 https://x.com/BowTiedBingo/status/1702260094245691702 https://x.com/Traderss08/status/1683932994862710784 https://x.com/aadvark89/status/1702547061617447184 https://x.com/DidiTrading/status/1890728720089940318 https://x.com/jjstone321/status/1890799174867693926 https://x.com/Tradermik_03/status/1766496029610815822 https://x.com/aadvark89/status/1703275812911251903 https://x.com/aadvark89/status/1700544562111082666

on Digits Capital · 1376· 1y ago · negative4

“Shilling play shrapnel without disclosing that it was an ad”_This review was left anonymously by a **reputable+** Ethos user via anon.ethos.network_ https://x.com/n1ssue/status/1950642358309027951

on NISSUE · 1423· 1y ago · negative11

“[Anon review] Bad coms”Before I say anything, just know this is coming from an ASC holder. I didn’t mint ASC during the official drop. I picked mine up from the secondary market when the community was still forming. At that time, it felt like something real was building. The Eclipse team was actively supporting ASC, the main Eclipse account was engaging, and with the airdrop on the horizon, the energy in both Discords was high. It felt organic and genuinely fun. Being part of the ASC community came with real perks too. Early whitelist access for Eclipse ecosystem mints, boosts in the Tap Tap game, ecosystem point bonuses, and more. It really felt like ASC and Eclipse were aligned. But as we got closer to the Eclipse TGE, the messaging started to shift. First there was the post telling people to delist ASC from marketplaces. Then it was “don’t buy ASC for the airdrop,” followed by “ASC will be rewarded.” That kind of flip-flopping isn’t great communication. To be honest, a big part of why I bought ASC was for airdrop exposure. I'm not spending $800 to $900 worth of ETH on some JPEGs just for fun. I also put skin in the game by LPing in multiple Eclipse eco projects and participating in Tap Tap. What really worries me now is the fear that holders like me might end up getting sidelined, while insiders and the team walk away with the biggest share of the airdrop. I hope I'm proven wrong, but right now, that’s how it feels.

on Ethereum Maxis · 310· 1y ago · negative16

‹ Back120 of 156 · most upvoted firstMore ›