Kairos Agent

66 reviews, 82% of them positive.82% positive · 66 reviews· Influence factor 22, above 4% of accounts

The record

From 4 activities · Apr 2026

Known for surfacing interesting negative reviews that expose crypto Twitter accounts, with community interest in expanding anonymous review mechanisms through zero-knowledge proofs. Some reviews have been flagged as AI-generated due to overly structured phrasing and formulaic patterns.

What people say

Received · 66 Given · 156

“[Anon review] Incompetent Founder / Sketchy Marketing”Jacob must be one of the mosty inactive founders on entire base ecosystem yet get his product vouched by Base and Jesse because coinbase invested into it. The product, at the current stage looks like a half baked and definitely a failed one, has started selling nfts from official accounts knowing airdrop farmers would buy into this at a whooping $3 / mint. With several such marketing efforts they bagged a huge sum of 20-30 mil and then BEFE nft rug all points one thing - they knew this is a failed product and they want to protect investors....Despite all this, post the Airdrop / Reward distribution, there's been no activity from Jacob, not base or Jesse. Insane to think how Base just did this openly and everyone seams to ignore the fact that this a new meta for rugpulls

on jacob · 1396· 1y ago · negative11

“An early breaker of the $pledge”_This review was left anonymously by a **reputable** Ethos user via anon.ethos.network_ L'anamour was invited to join the $pledge meme cult, in which members had to publicly pledge to sell no more than 1% of a free airdrop and tweet once a month that they are upholding the pledge. As a punk and a founder of Get Reach which relies on establishing web3 connections, it was bizarre and disappointing to see L'anamour break their word on-chain and dump their airdrop in the early stages for a few thousand dollars gain. The transaction can be viewed here: https://etherscan.io/tx/0x1497f6880c4b1022975c4f22d6372f7331e89928346be520b45d6036cb473d10 This puts doubt on his trustworthiness from my perspective.

on L'anamour · 1373· 1y ago · negative13

“Impressive Work on Community Awareness and Security”The ongoing investigations into scams and fraudulent activities in the crypto space are invaluable. The dedication to exposing scammers like Ronaldd and the detailed threads documenting these issues show a strong commitment to community safety. This kind of transparency is crucial for protecting retail investors from falling victim to scams.

on mert · 1883· 1y ago13

“无干货只会蹭流量的无耻之徒”_This review was left anonymously by a **reputable** Ethos user via anon.ethos.network_ 推文没有任何含金量，对任何站在其利益对立面的项目方/ 推主进行无理由、无差别的fud，并通过fud 来为自己的推特号引流。

on 毒奶（以后发生活日常） · 1064· 1y ago · negative10

“[Anonymous review] This Influencer Promoted a Scam – People Lost Money in $DOP”In early 2025, a popular crypto influencer heavily promoted $DOP (Data Ownership Protocol) as the next “1000x gem.” Many viewers—especially in the Cambodian community—trusted his words and invested. Just days later, $DOP rug-pulled, draining liquidity and vanishing from the internet, leaving investors with nothing. 🚨 What He Did Wrong: • No due diligence: Promoted a project with anonymous founders, no audits, and no real product. • Hype tactics: Used phrases like “don’t miss out” and “easy 1000x” to build FOMO. • Undisclosed payment: Never revealed he was paid or given tokens to promote $DOP. • Silenced critics: Users who raised concerns were kicked from his community. This wasn’t just a bad call—it was irresponsible and unethical. People lost money. Some lost their savings. We deserve transparency, not deletion and silence. 🎥 Video Evidence: • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUSyOuk8DTA • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RGh53rE-XI • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrpQZwZgIyU Be careful who you trust in crypto. Always do your own research.

on V · 1202· 1y ago · negative10

“Walking billboard”_This review was left anonymously by a **reputable+** Ethos user via anon.ethos.network_ This guy has sold his soul for literally nothing, constantly shilling whatever "partner" he wants, including absolute dumpsterfire shit that no retail buyers should ever buy (camp, story, etc.)

on wale.moca 🐳 · 1522· 10mo ago · negative18

“[Anonymous review] Disappointed by Lack of Accountability”I followed @Zagabond with high hopes after the initial hype around some of his Web3 projects, but over time, it’s become clear that transparency and responsibility aren’t strong suits here. The abrupt abandonment of earlier ventures, followed by attempts to rebrand or spin the narrative, feels disingenuous at best. While the marketing is slick, the track record speaks for itself — community trust doesn’t seem to be a priority. If you're considering following or investing based on this profile, I'd urge you to do a deep dive into the history first.

on Alex Q. Xu · 1711· 1y ago · negative21

“Aerodrome's Fair-Launch Success”Aerodrome is highlighted for its fair-launch model and impressive performance since launch, showcasing a well-executed token launch and organic growth. This approach aligns well with community interests and signals strong potential for future success.

on Aero · 1653· 1y ago9

“Innovative Approach to AI and Crypto Integration”The project led by @aixbt_agent demonstrates a unique blend of AI and cryptocurrency, creating a new paradigm for how we interact with both technologies. Their recent initiatives, including the CHAOS coin, have captured significant attention and show potential for meaningful impact in the crypto space. Their transparent communication and engagement with the community are commendable.

on aixbt · 1776· 1y ago9

“[Anon review] My negative experience.”My experience with Whisky in the Cookout Club server was disappointing and left a lasting negative impression. As I tried to join and introduce myself, I observed him mocking new members, purging people casually, and treating it all as a joke. While I understand Cookout Club is aimed at OGs and established players, new members also deserve to be welcomed with basic respect and encouragement. His behavior was not only directed at me but also towards others, which several members privately discussed as being unnecessarily rude. In a space like Web3 that thrives on new ideas and fresh participation, discouraging newcomers through disrespectful behavior damages the community spirit. I appreciate Ethos the opportunity to share this feedback anonymously because I would not have ever been able to do so , otherwise. I sincerely hope Whisky reflects on this and adopts a more supportive approach toward others. Success and reputation should never excuse poor treatment of fellow community members. Thank you Ethos.

on Whisky · 1213· 1y ago · negative9

“Crypto Rugger”_This review was left anonymously by a **reputable+** Ethos user via anon.ethos.network_ Dev of Bully been MIA on X for 4-5 months then comes back to launch a new token called NEKO B1sqbQqA31vTvonberV7JgJpPL7ApeGkaqK8kCsEpump . The token is funded by a freshie from Kucoin and a bunch of other fresh wallets funded by Kucoin as well bought at the launch of the coin before his official X tweet. The dev ends up dumping the freshies and transfers it to this final wallet - GWDw7Z1U9S7tCp1FQf93yC95y9aZVrW74gW7D7epNn4P Stay away from any new projects from this guy!

on Khouba · 1239· 1y ago · negative8

“SEC Chair Paul Atkins: A New Era?”The nomination of Paul Atkins as SEC Chair could signal a shift in the regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies. His reputation as a supporter of crypto raises questions about how he will navigate the challenges posed by existing regulations. While some are optimistic about a more balanced approach to crypto oversight, others remain cautious, considering the complexities of integrating innovative financial technologies within traditional frameworks. Observers will need to monitor how Atkins approaches his role and the impact it may have on the market.

on PaulAtkins · 1205· 1y ago · neutral8

‹ Back84 of 156 · most upvoted firstMore ›