LEGION

311 reviews, 52% of them positive.52% positive · 311 reviews· Influence factor 159, above 31% of accounts

The record

From 296 activities · Apr 2026

Legion is a merit-based ICO launchpad that allocates token sales based on on-chain activity, social contributions, and GitHub presence rather than wallet size, earning praise for its fair and transparent approach to democratizing early-stage investment access. The platform has successfully launched projects like Fuel, YieldBasis, and Giza, with many users reporting solid returns and appreciation for the team's mission-driven focus. However, Legion faces persistent criticism for severe infrastructure failures during high-demand sales—website crashes, freezes, and slow support response times have plagued major launches, particularly YieldBasis, leaving users frustrated with transaction failures and unclear allocation distribution; additionally, concerns about scoring opacity, bot activity, KYC delays, and misleading performance metrics have undermined trust despite the platform's innovative concept.

What people say

Received · 311 Given · 0

“n e e d u r g e n t s u p p o r t”n e e d u r g e n t s u p p o r t. k y c f a i l e d, n o t s u p p o r t e d, no a p p f o r p h o n e.

NTV · 1202· 1y ago · negative4

“Bad expirience”My experience attempting transactions on the Legion platform has been consistently marred by severe operational difficulties. The system appears critically unable to handle sudden spikes in demand, frequently resulting in site crashes. Furthermore, the wallet scoring mechanism seems opaque and lacks fairness, and communication during sales events is virtually non-existent. This suggests a significant failure to conduct adequate stress testing. While the core concept is promising, the current execution is deeply flawed. Until these fundamental issues are resolved, it is difficult to view the platform as a reliable service.

serhio.base.eth · 1209· 1y ago · negative4

“Investing Should Be Earned, Not Reserved”What I like about @legiondotcc is that it's rethinking how early-stage crypto investing works. Instead of giving exclusive access to a small group of insiders, Legion uses a reputation-based system (Legion Score) that rewards meaningful participation and contributions to the ecosystem. This creates a fairer way for users to access promising token launches while helping startups attract engaged, long-term supporters rather than short-term speculators. It's a practical approach that benefits both builders and investors, making early-stage fundraising more transparent and merit-based.

Volinets · 1408· 3mo ago7

“Legion.cc is currently (as of 2025) the best ICO Platform for non-KOL and investors to participate in!!!”ICO has been stressing. It's either fair launch where the devs are looking for exit liquidity, or heavily botted fair launch or those scam auctions. Later on, there's some platform that require KYC but does not give any specific criteria. Legion assess individuals through KYC and 4 scores, which is very fair to us "norma" users who are not KOLs and big guys in the industry. Legion assess scores, based on our on-chain activities (the number of transactions, the age of wallet, etc), our Github scores contribution, and finally, our X account performance. The final criteria seems to come from our participations on previous sales to ensure that we users are NOT sybils. I've used multiple ICO platforms and so far Legion is the best for us small but hardworking guys. I would request everyone to open up, help contribute to the DeFi ecosystem and move forward together. Legion have had its up and down, but they always did things right!

Por | DeFiSecret · 1290· 11mo ago3

“deep blue see”

conell · 1243· 1y ago · negative3

“I have to leave a negative review, maybe it's not Legion's fault, but the YieldBasis project itself, but still”I’d like to share feedback on the recent YieldBasis sale hosted on your platform. While this may ultimately be tied to the project’s side, the participant experience looked unusual. Across multiple community channels, I saw virtually no one who received an allocation. Personally, my score was 760, and I know many active users with 900+ who also reported 0 allocation. It’s the first time I’ve seen such a pattern on a reputable launchpad, which naturally raised concerns that allocations may have been concentrated elsewhere. To close the perception gap and protect Legion’s credibility, could you share a brief transparency postmortem with: - Total unique participants and winners - Min/median/max score among winners and overall acceptance rate - The allocation method (random vs. score-weighted) and any randomness source used - Any allowlists/strategic allocations (team, partners, market makers) and their share - Anti-Sybil measures employed - Proofs/audits (e.g., verifiable randomness, Merkle lists) or a public winners list with redacted addresses If the distribution was driven by the project’s requirements, stating that clearly would help the community align expectations. I value Legion and want to continue supporting launches here; transparent metrics and proof-of-fairness would resolve the current doubts and strengthen trust for future sales.

KiliaCryptoBD · 1234· 1y ago · negative3

“Legion’s presale process lacks transparency; denied access to YieldBasis without explanation.”

Alex Garkaviy 🦅🟠 · 1280· 1y ago · negative3

“we have a company valued in the millions of dollars, but when ico event their website goes down, the valuation is fake”

yuaaa.ink (✧ᴗ✧)🧙‍♂️,🧙‍♂️ · 1196· 1y ago · negative3

“strong platform, i love onchain score repution , i think is the future of ico projects. ico are back thanks to legion”

Bollo87.ink · 1268· 12mo ago3

“Best Experience So Far!”The overall experience is great and the team is also helpful from the start. I really like the implementation of Legion Score to really evaluate member’s contribution/participation in the ecosystem. I’m excited in the coming updates from the Legion team!

0xEEe6...C33a · 1185· 11mo ago1

““New Standard For Launchpads””I’ve been following this project closely, and I have to say I’m genuinely impressed with what they’re building. They were among the very first to bring the concept of on-chain reputation into the launchpad space, which is a huge step forward compared to the traditional presale model we’ve all been used to. Of course, the system is still in its early days — it’s not flawless yet and definitely requires further refinement. But the direction is clear and highly promising. Instead of relying purely on hype or luck, this approach allows projects to select presale participants based on their verified on-chain reputation. That means track records, contributions, and credibility actually matter when it comes to who gets access. This doesn’t just create a fairer allocation process; it also helps filter for higher-quality participants who are genuinely invested in the ecosystem, not just short-term speculators. In the long run, that adds real value to the projects launching on the platform and strengthens the overall community. In my view, this feels like the start of a new standard for launchpads — one where reputation and accountability play as big a role as capital.

han · 1272· 1y ago3

“Empowering Fair Access in Web3 Fundraising”Legion feels like a breath of fresh air in the fundraising space. Instead of chasing hype, they’re building something that gives real weight to community reputation. It’s less about who holds the biggest bag and more about who actually contributes. The transparency in how they operate makes it easy to trust. Quietly solid project — one that actually walks the talk.

t"| (❖,❖) .ink l privacy szn · 1218· 11mo ago1

‹ Back204 of 311 · most upvoted firstMore ›