Profile· Neutral@markissincryptoOn Ethos

mark
1 review, positive.100% positive · 1 review· Influence factor 0, above 0% of accountsThe record
From 1 activities · Jul 2026A valued contributor to crypto telegram communities.
What people say
Received · 1Given · 105“Useful for sentiment, dangerous for decisions”Becker has a genuine pulse on retail narrative momentum — when he's loud about something, retail is paying attention. That's usable information. But his track record as an advisor and caller is poor when measured honestly. Follow to gauge hype cycles, never to make decisions.
on Alex Becker 🍊🏆🥇 · 762· 5mo ago · negative0
on Alex Becker 🍊🏆🥇 · 762· 5mo ago · negative0“Technology yes, token unclear”Hard to separate Zcash the technology from Zcash the investment. The ZK contributions are undeniable — without Zcash, Ethereum's ZK rollup ecosystem looks very different. But the token has underperformed every cycle, governance is a mess after the ECC split, and Monero fills the actual privacy use case better. Interesting tech, uninspiring investment.
on Zcash 🛡️ · 1520· 5mo ago · neutral0
on Zcash 🛡️ · 1520· 5mo ago · neutral0“Every detail was a lie”Kaito presale terms: 100% unlock at TGE. Actual terms: changed after the money was in. Discord verification: contained a wallet drainer. Founder identity: fabricated. I don't use the word scam lightly but there's no other word for this. Documented, on-chain, irrefutable.
on Billions Network · 683· 5mo ago · negative0
on Billions Network · 683· 5mo ago · negative0“Separating the signal from the story”His directional market reads on Solana and majors have been more right than wrong. That's the value. The personal narrative — early SOL holder, exit timing, insider adjacency — is harder to verify and becoming harder to trust. I use the macro takes, ignore the personal mythology.
on Ansem 🐂🀄️ · 1830· 5mo ago · neutral0
on Ansem 🐂🀄️ · 1830· 5mo ago · neutral0“Hard to know when the show became the scam”Early content was chaotic but harmless. The $RASMR launch and subsequent dump changed the calculus. I don't know if he planned it or just got lucky with the timing — but his viewers paid for it either way. The engagement baiting is real, the calls are unreliable. Neutral with low trust.
on rasmr · 992· 5mo ago · neutral0
on rasmr · 992· 5mo ago · neutral0“Strong product, ecosystem bet”The fundamentals are genuinely clean — no VC tokens, audited twice, 0% fees, real volume. What I can't evaluate is the Hyperliquid ecosystem trajectory. Project X's ceiling is directly tied to how big HyperEVM gets. If HL becomes a top-3 chain, this is a great position. If it plateaus, PRJX plateaus with it. Not a product concern, a market concern.
on Project X · 1618· 5mo ago · neutral0
on Project X · 1618· 5mo ago · neutral0“Lottery is lottery”The mechanics are genuinely clever — LP model, provably fair draws, stablecoin payouts. Team is legit, backers are real. My issue is the product itself: it's a lottery. The target user is someone who wants to gamble, not someone who wants yield. Whether that's a big enough market at scale I genuinely don't know. Interesting experiment.
on Megapot · 1495· 5mo ago · neutral0
on Megapot · 1495· 5mo ago · neutral0“Can't separate the product from the politics”USD1 works and has real adoption. World Liberty Markets is a functioning DeFi lending platform. On pure product metrics — not bad. But the ownership structure, the UAE deal, the Justin Sun situation — each one alone would be concerning. Together they make it impossible to evaluate this as just another DeFi project. Watching without participating.
on WLFI · 1071· 5mo ago · neutral0
on WLFI · 1071· 5mo ago · neutral0“Both sides have dirty hands”Avi calls out Pasternak for dumping. Pasternak calls out Avi for secret sells at launch. On-chain data supports both accusations. This is what happens when two people who don't trust each other do business together. The real losers are the holders. No strong opinion on who's worse.
on Avi Patel · 923· 5mo ago · neutral0
on Avi Patel · 923· 5mo ago · neutral0“Hard to separate signal from noise”Bio Protocol occupies a genuine niche — biotech funding is broken and blockchain could fix it. But I can't tell where the science ends and the narrative begins. Token performance during the farming period was concerning. Not calling it a scam, not calling it clean either. Blackbox for now.
on Bio Protocol · 1540· 5mo ago0
on Bio Protocol · 1540· 5mo ago0“Legit product, gacha is a concern”The core is solid — physically backed cards, provably fair pack openings, instant buyback at 85-90%. Revenue numbers are real. My concern is the gacha mechanic — it's essentially a loot box system, which has regulatory risk in multiple jurisdictions. Worth watching but not blindly bullish.
on phygitals · 1515· 5mo ago0
on phygitals · 1515· 5mo ago0“Leads the category it's in”Base is the best L2 currently operating. Fast, cheap, growing ecosystem. Coinbase backing removes the existential risk most L2s carry. The mass adoption argument is a different question — crypto broadly isn't there yet. Base can't solve that alone.
on Base · 1874· 5mo ago0
on Base · 1874· 5mo ago0
Someguy
Afi
Grethos
aadvark
Majdi
Sk0rp.eth
Ethos
Brandon scott
vitalik.eth
Dpuck (bob)
Bálint Popovits
Mark Karpelès
Riyo
CryptoPasokos
Tbeagle ⨀