MoversSomeguy↓416Afi↓374Grethos↓351aadvark↓277Majdi↓263TradeSk0rp.eth↑48.8%Donald J. Trump↓13.3%Ethos↓1.7%vitalik.eth↑1.0%VouchesTucosalamanca943 WHUF → EthosDpuck (bob)50 WHUF → freshout.ape 🍄🦍MMatt25 WHUF → Rahulxero.hlAnton Boiarchuk10 WHUF → Sk0rp.ethReviewsTbeagle ⨀positive · 24 upvotesBboatpositive · 10 upvotesRahulxero.hlpositive · 8 upvotesSk0rp.ethpositive · 5 upvotes
Profile· Known@miyaspokeofthisOn Ethos
Username McUserface ( ͠° ͟ʖ ͡°)

Username McUserface ( ͠° ͟ʖ ͡°)

28 reviews, 61% of them positive; 100 WHUF vouched for them by 1 person.61% positive · 28 reviews· 100 WHUF vouched· Influence factor 14, above 3% of accounts

The record

From 25 activities · Apr 2026

A prolific contributor known for sharp analysis of scams, rugs, and protocol mechanics, with deep expertise in crypto, cybersecurity, and privacy narratives. Consistently calls out low-effort reviews and bad actors in the community, though critics dispute whether their negative reviews are always thoroughly investigated or sometimes driven by personal disputes rather than objective analysis.

“not a fan of this type of founder”I used to use Furyan's platform Vision quite a lot back in the day. At some point it was "THE" platform for ENS - while it was still in the "v1". I used it on a daily basis back then. Then they went into maintenance for months. https://x.com/miyaspokeofthis/status/1938506480111726699 https://x.com/miyaspokeofthis/status/1938535640154415225 When they fully came out of maintenance the platform was just broken. Things that worked before suddenly didn't. The "Vision v2" was basically "Vision v1 but broken". Literally. Same platform and same features - just broken and unusable. For example bulk listing names and hitting a value above 1023 caused a client side error. https://x.com/miyaspokeofthis/status/1945568096019775956 There were more issues with the platform, but nobody from the team seemed to check discord pings. They had a support portal - which didn't even work anymore. The discord had multiple channels and bots for support / tickets - none of them worked. One of the support channels had no write permissions so it was just empty 😹 The get-help channel had no attachment permissions and nobody monitored it anyway. In my opinion - that's way too many support channels in which you can't even get support lol The only way top reach the team was writing on the timeline. So I did, because there wasn't any other option to actually reach the team. I also CC'd Furyan in the replies. https://x.com/miyaspokeofthis/status/1960847025190396120 Immediately after that tweet Furyan slid into my DMs. "I will look at your issue in the morning, promise." (He didn't.) He got a list of all the broken things from one of their power users. He replied: "I know it's buggy, we can fix some things but in 30-45 days a completely new platform will replace Vision." One of the highly annoying things was the sudden inability to bulk select with shift: "doesn't let you quick select with shift" was one of the highly annoying things I mentioned in my DM, followed by "if you want i can help in power testing stuff." Not even a day after saying they can fix some of the highly annoying issues, Furyan said the following: "In a month or so Vision v3 will be out, this vision will stay as is until then. We can talk about collab once v3 is out. " Vision v1 (working) -> very long maintenance period -> Vision v2 (Vision v1 but broken) -> Vision v3 relaunch because the v2 was just v1 but broken and nobody wanted to fix any of the new issues. And then the v3 relaunch came out. It was worse than v1. Bulk listing ability wasn't there on launch. At some point they added it, but you couldn't shift-select multiple names (you still can't lol). The name selection was seriously flawed, you could only select names while precisely clicking within a checkbox. If you had already selected multiple names and missed the checkbox, your whole selection was nuked because it opened a name in the same tab. The v3 came out worse than the v1. Even after multiple feature additions it is still incomparably worse than the v1 they had. The cherry on top was Furyan claiming that for v3 they are "assembling a cracked team of ENS degENS". Apparently those people aren't actual "cracked degens" which some of the v3 functionality already points towards. I don't think a single "cracked ENS degen" on his team actually used v1 of Vision. If they did, then the V3 wouldn't be in the sorry state it is. That became painfully clear when Vision tweeted something that showed they don't even understand basic ENS functionality (resolving). https://x.com/miyaspokeofthis/status/2020240748243800120 https://x.com/miyaspokeofthis/status/2020286435010482190 https://x.com/miyaspokeofthis/status/2020297022520062436 Calling Furyan out, together with his "cracked ENS degens" got me a petty unfollow from him 😹 https://x.com/miyaspokeofthis/status/2020554943795482644 I don't like founders like that. The fact that you have power-users of your platform trying to reach out through 5 broken support channels to give you detailed issue reports which you ignore is one thing. Claiming to have "cracked ENS degens" on your team, while they obviously neither understand ENS nor use the platform is another. It's especially bad when you consider people were reaching out to test and offer feedback, but were declined because they have "muh cracked ENS degen team which doesn't even understand basic ENS functionality nor has actually used the product we're building". Sigh... This is how great ideas and great products die. By ignoring power users and all user feedback - which isn't even easy to deliver considering all the non-functional feedback/support channels. And by letting people who never used your platform make design decisions. By letting people who don't even understand ENS functionality talk about ENS functionality. All of that explains the current state of Vision. And that's all on Furyan. Not only could they have left v1 vision as it was - and it still would be better than the v2 people waited months for - and the v3 which is somehow even worse than the v2. This is a massive leadership failure. I still check Vision from time to time, and have to cringe at the sorry state of the marketplace. The 2023 Vision v1 was 1000x better than Vision v3 in 2026 💀 Over the past 3 years the only progress was regressing the platform and making it worse than the v1 they initially launched. Furyan, and his decisions, are to blame for that.on Furyan🦇🔊🛡️ · 1213· 6mo ago · negative8
“scam, likely tied to an Axiom affiliate”Profile with 0 mutuals, likes a few of your posts, gives you a follow, immediately sends a sketchy DM: "Hey! My name is Jeff Willson and I would like to personally invite you to join our podcast where we will talk to founders, analysts and other guys who are interested in various memecoins We focus on capital markets infrastructure - structured yield, risk analysis and capital efficiency for global financial systems. We use this podcast to understand what is actually happening in this cycle, not just the trends - and your opinion will be a valuable contribution to this We will be glad to have you on our air. If you are ready to participate, write to me and we will arrange it" The profile bio lists a few things: Partner @axiomexchange http://axiom.trade/@tozpax @solana @phantom If you try to look up "@Tozpax" you will get hits for the twitter profile @Cryptoze because Tozpax was his previous handle. Examples of mentions: https://x.com/Damianjnrr/status/1957872651210485984 https://x.com/Damianjnrr/status/1957872572777066839 Examples of some of the undeleted @Cryptoze tweets mentioning to follow his profile @Tozpax are below. As you can see, ALL of the tweets are fake engagement bait giveaways: https://x.com/Cryptoze/status/1956724038853652816 https://x.com/Cryptoze/status/1956316372465565789 https://x.com/Cryptoze/status/1956097190662648273 https://x.com/Cryptoze/status/1955588987512627495 https://x.com/Cryptoze/status/1955244467314675944 https://x.com/Cryptoze/status/1954947216323592279 https://x.com/Cryptoze/status/1954180113446076494 https://x.com/Cryptoze/status/1952063069565149522 https://x.com/Cryptoze/status/1950327666604912700 https://x.com/Cryptoze/status/1949836626659565930 https://x.com/Cryptoze/status/1948366756512145810 https://x.com/Cryptoze/status/1946675121135010251 While scammers often pretend to be others, it makes little sense for someone not even impersonating @Cryptoze to use his Axiom reflink in the bio 💀 To sum it up: Jeff Wilson aka @Wilsonjai1 is a scam profile, and it uses an Axiom reflink @Tozpax. Tozpax is the previous handle of @Cryptoze who is an Axiom affiliate. He did fake engagement bait giveaways in the past and then changed his username (Tozpax -> Cryptoze). I would give him the benefit of the doubt due to the possibility that "Jeff Wilson" might have impersonated him in the past. But it makes 0 sense to have his Axiom reflink on that account, and given the accounts sketchy past I tend towards "grifters be grifting (in many ways)"on Jeff Wilson · 1200· 7mo ago · negative8
‹ Back156 of 241 · most upvoted firstMore ›